GNU bug report logs - #39976
next browser fails to build

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39976: closed (next browser fails to build)
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:43:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:39:45 +0100
with message-id <20200307163945.GB1773 <at> doom>
and subject line Re: next browser fails to build
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39976,
regarding next browser fails to build
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
39976: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39976
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:28:31 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

what is the status of next browser?

When I noticed there is such thing I was happy as it could be
replacement for Conkeror and even with better language to use....

I used to have crashes pretty often and usually blamed WebKit for that...

But for some time I'm not able even to build it.

It seems that I have the same issue as can be seen here:

 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/91snb4sd5c6xrp930s3v5a5yrxfr0n3h-next-1.5.0


Thanks in advance,

Tomáš Čech

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 39976-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:39:45 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi!

On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Glad to see you are interested in Next! :)
>
>Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix.
>
>However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it.  But no worries, I've just
>pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'.
>
>I'm hard at work with Next 2.0 and it should fix some long standing
>issues that are still in Next 1.5.0.

Thanks for swift response and reaction. I can confirm that new pull
fixes the issue for me.

>Stay tuned!

I will, good luck with 2.0!

Best regards,

Tomáš Čech


PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail
   without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one -
   please, be so kind and close it.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.