From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 07 10:30:51 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2020 15:30:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAbPe-0007v2-PU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:30:51 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAbPc-0007uu-NQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:30:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAbPa-0007sE-Dl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:30:47 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAbPa-0005IL-9E; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:30:46 -0500 Received: from [94.230.156.245] (port=43208 helo=gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jAbPZ-00022S-1y; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:30:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:28:31 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: next browser fails to build Message-ID: <20200307152831.GA1773@doom> Mail-Followup-To: bug-guix@gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, what is the status of next browser? When I noticed there is such thing I was happy as it could be replacement for Conkeror and even with better language to use.... I used to have crashes pretty often and usually blamed WebKit for that... But for some time I'm not able even to build it. It seems that I have the same issue as can be seen here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/91snb4sd5c6xrp930s3v5a5yrxfr0n3h-next-1.5.0 Thanks in advance, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAl5jvZ0ACgkQSiPjT6Az Q22TCg/9FJea2ZMqrhN9BtR/X/QAydQZKLs01hEogA2VC0Ji5sIiUJvznmDQ7VR/ ZpFflKNTHcPRJYpLeylwV5XszR/kYcFkNzmhjmQd5uToAL3lLJDPlZJSueFBV5Br VxtWpQyVl03qUbuWOcFpKi1sdmOqkrjLFc3SmICtOwIVxuPZGN+YEFP3MYaRqTkQ CcwplAx1Lb6gBrcwzuyO5eRVk79Oe/dQmpLXBVYaJhxxlcWc++3G0o4HrtKRz0NO mdbEamHcy/mgTxtPkx3x+POUWkCCDViPhEMCb5EFJXhTN0JPkITt6vl+EVsLe8Cm UyiuV1snFAqvlBUEG4oE4mYDMIq0CPN83+R825TPJmLVQYwPAOMYrhUwyaRTmSn7 NxOD3Eau2LBJDYDDAkHiSj+E17BimDgcQDUnij+8dLJE44tLPzXZLbB6MAxFd1uJ UsS/93rFkrD9XgI5ylxQeR23H2SVAAgvsC/pZO/QvAK3HQRax/voRxsLdfsMhOn9 1wRFwZ8kjZ7Iq0Idq2ANW5Sybf/DFC2Jal+AwzGVuLBwBcCYZKsjkDAsaDXDmod7 S8bPRYfHPxgwLQqk81ZrSmRTvYNgazfoUoKClIj5On937vIaTabv78z4c9enP952 aDBOiGEWz5DlFCWrx3nlXLPwFatuCiVORs2yKJjyO7X9b3k0myE= =0xEw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 07 11:13:08 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2020 16:13:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAc4a-0000SM-F0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:13:08 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47360) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAc4Y-0000SE-3s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:13:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAc4W-0000Yu-Uq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:13:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAc4V-0004oo-Pt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:13:04 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:59515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAc4V-0004jM-Jv; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:13:03 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.129.147 Received: from mimimi (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E215BC0005; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:13:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= , bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: next browser fails to build In-Reply-To: <20200307152831.GA1773@doom> References: <20200307152831.GA1773@doom> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:13:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87d09o87oz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.198 X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi! Glad to see you are interested in Next! :) Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix. Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi! Glad to see you are interested in Next! :) Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix. Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Glad to see you are interested in Next! :) Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix. However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it. But no worries, I've just pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'. I'm hard at work with Next 2.0 and it should fix some long standing issues that are still in Next 1.5.0. Stay tuned! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl5jyAwACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH82qwf9GKxj6ccUjzGKlcnxWn9YJ5eGLT3okGxpX+KY19FZ6/8o9xyO/2oZmvTk Gm1l8QFuu49EHIAdUPVf0c0pfGfWZL0zjPo87gQYJDzaL19v9y0hR8kbfqVujdEi arVugYkQLVmFBvkZ8ndOvH8Ft4SbNCt8RHH1attVyY4A0wXDLtwOWYtVZ4YsSyXE 9gUxRA6ni7UHIoMMPwMu6jsS5aRSJtFVU60N2vVBK9NF5SMxH6eVdptJkOxKPG9d RtLNn6JPqkpYgxPIMeLW8kP/H/rtgOMf4o0sYWKUATA2vwToh4aONbsgJEuO1Vyo C7dkfLeuztT+aiRvbAmw1SO5z2rw5A== =stgr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 07 11:42:06 2020 Received: (at 39976-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2020 16:42:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47451 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcWb-00018O-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:42:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcWa-00017v-Kd for 39976-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:42:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcWU-0005gj-Ly; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:41:58 -0500 Received: from [94.230.156.245] (port=44316 helo=gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcWU-0001Ch-0x; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:41:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:39:45 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: next browser fails to build Message-ID: <20200307163945.GB1773@doom> References: <20200307152831.GA1773@doom> <87d09o87oz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d09o87oz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39976-done Cc: 39976-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >Hi! > >Glad to see you are interested in Next! :) > >Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix. > >However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it. But no worries, I've just >pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'. > >I'm hard at work with Next 2.0 and it should fix some long standing >issues that are still in Next 1.5.0. Thanks for swift response and reaction. I can confirm that new pull fixes the issue for me. >Stay tuned! I will, good luck with 2.0! Best regards, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one - please, be so kind and close it. --mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAl5jzlEACgkQSiPjT6Az Q21V6g//WtUeL9Z8Evvaym/GluIdwzzzTC0fdyS+LARg65nkP6xWyyI9LtJAj2d3 QkZMZ/fhH5un6ZQdlQECpbcD3JoVx4pUU6EGAcL78OeIuPq4MYCHy8R7xS/S/1DW lRHVYhkHY6tpovAYqqbgV/UVBLqj2y1OoYT0rOTonQD/zuCgXEG/6I3N8uZZ3wOC QYX1mjgCIfQ6ODJBadfQ/y+MAuG02PAZTRhP7zk6pbJrqjPCODS/GKWnBSUDsYkH IVYG9CXV7sa0Gg/n3XvGcCdkqPxbfHdVOXJyVCq+s+0FuergmZKUALvEEbpSCrPv KiCDmjQUE2dF2aWGW2UdoPg8J3UlE/9wv6U3yKf84cVE7sy/61N75xZQx7GYL8Zq VQJay/ki2EQT52J7rPh54D01PO5zkNU7/st54DpbuaqQ+J2A7zQbdzLqqrRYII7T avoKKi14HB1LFGxMk2taQIH12LFWMeeVvt/PpLMRfXtYGtZfoSwsMdx6qYR2hn9T BzqmIT5Q/uPpmZNTqtDFx4651X4+bNps6UFXY5FT6Lc/URzhUgyuOpIks/htvgEA +qLOBlRh+6owS/Z1oa9WXBCMVZSUpu0dPcUr/qCreEyI+/WlMhpZYQvBoly8kUeV bBTkFG8cS7s0786Q3Qw06yN9rOv8QKhgTIau5U0nON/1S2ZAKgE= =LFex -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 07 11:52:36 2020 Received: (at 39976-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2020 16:52:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcgl-0001Ns-SZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:52:36 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:17483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcgj-0001Ne-26 for 39976-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:52:34 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.129.147 Received: from mimimi (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A41B7240002; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:52:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: next browser fails to build In-Reply-To: <20200307163945.GB1773@doom> References: <20200307152831.GA1773@doom> <87d09o87oz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200307163945.GB1773@doom> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:52:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87a74s85v9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tomáš Čech writes: > PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail > without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one - > please, be so kind and close it. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.193 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.193 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39976-done Cc: 39976-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tomáš Čech writes: > PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail > without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one - > please, be so kind and close it. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.193 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.193 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech writes: > PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail > without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one - > please, be so kind and close it. I don't see a second bug. Do you have a link? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl5j0UoACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH+4iQgAmQDmj/j67wv/f50sbEytjwbAjqvmPHwdXuc6PuAPf6nv5//8imiezjT/ i3K7bNG7+OpmCKvqPm5ILZN71MwBh7BVX+brpTspiHuaGSXuNQnzQwl4baaha7Fu dI5FXsBZykf4LIPwjYq7P2A0XBHn5l/P8cNUJWisMBUrE0pXZXGvUldqISzCAxME +XypmcaJQbWgah8+YFk9lw+/HCfRoWQS8Yxl4Huw4mAN+mmumHOZlCgt0Oz8eT6P yUfv5GcGCKBY/iefj8IGDwIO54gT0z3Cg+MIqOPWQlfwtesBUJEYBTUeqNAsHQmh NUf+0k+gIHQA+T0FT+OO3/t5aAUI/A== =CoPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 07 12:09:58 2020 Received: (at 39976) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2020 17:09:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcxZ-0001nF-Fi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 12:09:58 -0500 Received: from wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.231]:39782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcmQ-0001Vg-AV for 39976@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 11:58:27 -0500 Received: from www.rohleder.de ([37.61.204.227]); authenticated by wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jAcmO-0004rj-5a; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:58:24 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (helo=micha) by www.rohleder.de with smtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jAcmM-0002Ks-Kf; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:58:23 +0100 Received: by micha (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:58:09 +0100 From: mike@rohleder.de To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#39976: next browser fails to build References: <20200307152831.GA1773@doom> <87d09o87oz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:58:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d09o87oz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:13:00 +0100") Message-ID: <87mu8s14ri.fsf@rohleder.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;mike@rohleder.de;1583600306;f77e5124; X-HE-SMSGID: 1jAcmO-0004rj-5a X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt writes: > However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it. But no worries, I've just > pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'. Thank you very much! Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.237.132.231 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39976 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 12:09:56 -0500 Cc: sleep_walker@gnu.org, 39976@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre Neidhardt writes: > However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it. But no worries, I've just > pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'. Thank you very much! I can also confirm that it builds now. Regards mike =2D-=20 Happiness does not depend on what you have or who your are. It solely relies on what you think. Buddha --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAl5j0qEACgkQfHr/vv7y yyUtOAgAwSX6n+QdjBhaF1ssQnYKjVnE2WOGh8xLX2Ie+s9ebx3Iq9oil28Ljek+ 1QZ8gcklNgkY09dl6iEbowBRpQuRVqqO3VTnLByVhoDIsroABD2NZTG4cxn9DXjA ZF+I3jEN2xCP+EK6CDg6ctdhMDyHtiZMGU6YU+acR5LMBXA9wMFbJpEcP+AFcL3d at0YSvUTVyMAdqyKy6voRyDZtDk9QIzPye1TSUxwJWRSo8Jt9KJNoQXkmTPS/7XO JWsYu02wyonaTCquW0GX1CkRW/N8YSv03r5LEkRQCG7IS9R18HVpKZEFF7xaBRkv sAcTPoOKqHMPzCG7v7G0P0bI8OgnnQ== =BTah -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Aug 09 01:05:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator