From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:26:50 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#39949 <39949@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#39949 <39949@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [core-updates] rust@1.20 fails tests Reply-To: bug#39949 <39949@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 15:26:50 +0000 retitle 39949 [core-updates] rust@1.20 fails tests reassign 39949 guix submitter 39949 Marius Bakke severity 39949 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 06 09:33:39 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2020 14:33:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44308 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAE2l-00028q-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:33:39 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAE2j-00028i-QT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:33:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAE2i-0003kK-CH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:33:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPOOFED_FREEMAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAE2g-0002Dy-Uk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:33:36 -0500 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:51247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAE2g-0002By-HY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:33:34 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8972C6F3 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:33:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:33:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm2; bh=qIsqmkga/J5R23idI293qolhExq3d3+3zEakOE7L+zg=; b=j5fqoKW5 ejXWhaiaEwIaRW/zNpkygQuOg+ojr4TWQMpdLLyrd5c7grhgAb7ZQ0sI6vYq2JZU fNUmBts9LN/Ghe64Q92ToSDRq+CuYCsYkKwJN5dMSpQE6EL+Qizh0LdM7wquEaoz iYozIGDY0Pf6OiE+piBDtKuvJFWux+7FNwqrCOKSL+4AKoK9iW0pTaDSs9Rjoqbd LIexhFC7etW/vT8+ODZ0VXSS9FIrtJsOIFv0IfQCdDUNwD7ADMLzw1mVNpyX+l4U 3/3i67F4LrSZJnGs2rX7pRPQILIp8LrYsHbqax/5vNSYkz65nH3VRx1E0rSC8NtJ MF626sT0v52EjQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=qIsqmkga/J5R23idI293qolhExq3d 3+3zEakOE7L+zg=; b=sHkYsbgk9ngT+gXt5Mck6mPkTS4bAimttbIAYt1fCCHVI So1oO0JaVUTQbUkAFKJnvTMxG8wyPUPTPpdKb7An30WY6V9/nO5dAddz9cGcFAwy KCs7RBFC20jHJsNSLPuqFxBRmRzaeOVJ6AmCiIleMUNtMESzi9VM+P1YyH6e6DdZ J9PmSzxqVUfNkJmSr1U+7eY2WYxe2hnaSg+HeKFCqeyAYBAAuesJqdxaiK67+p4N G5OmYf8aNmMroZTLmFkOQ2a2ePqQAbBiLRovUR8vAQkSGHIJVcptNWVY2b9IQgqF PIEQ1S1s9RJmfN7RUDwIDFLHKwhXUJlF6SmsHegMw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudduvddgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufgffkfggtgesghdtreertd ertdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhiuhhsuceurghkkhgvuceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhm rghilhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepkeegrd dvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8D4B43280059 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:33:31 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: [core-updates] rust@1.20 fails tests User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 15:33:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87pndplfie.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.123.19 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Rust 1.20 fails a test on core-updates, possibly because of the new version of GNU Make (4.3). I suppose we can disable that test for the bootstrap builds as long as it works for the latest version of Rust. Log output: Running build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/jobserver-dd0c6bf78d70e32b running 3 tests test jobserver_and_j ... ok test jobserver_exists ... ok test makes_jobserver_used ... FAILED failures: ---- makes_jobserver_used stdout ---- running `make -j2` thread 'makes_jobserver_used' panicked at ' Expected: execs but: exited with exit code: 2 --- stdout /tmp/guix-build-rust-1.20.0.drv-0/rustc-1.20.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/cargo build --- stderr Compiling d1 v0.0.1 (file:///tmp/guix-build-rust-1.20.0.drv-0/rustc-1.20.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/cit/t2/foo/d1) Compiling d2 v0.0.1 (file:///tmp/guix-build-rust-1.20.0.drv-0/rustc-1.20.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/cit/t2/foo/d2) error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug. note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#bug-reports note: rustc 1.20.0 running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu thread 'rustc' panicked at 'failed to acquire jobserver token: Error { repr: Os { code: 11, message: "Resource temporarily unavailable" } }', src/libcore/result.rs:860:4 note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace. error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug. note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#bug-reports note: rustc 1.20.0 running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu thread 'rustc' panicked at 'failed to acquire jobserver token: Error { repr: Os { code: 11, message: "Resource temporarily unavailable" } }', src/libcore/result.rs:860:4 note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace. error: failed to acquire jobserver token Caused by: Resource temporarily unavailable (os error 11) make: *** [Makefile:2: all] Error 101 ', src/vendor/hamcrest/src/core.rs:31:12 note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace. failures: makes_jobserver_used test result: FAILED. 2 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out error: test failed, to rerun pass '--test jobserver' command did not execute successfully: "/gnu/store/c3jc4rlyj1b50djxny0ldpbpywaf5apr-rust-1.19.0-cargo/bin/cargo" "test" "-j" "1" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--release" "--frozen" "--manifest-path" "/tmp/guix-build-rust-1.20.0.drv-0/rustc-1.20.0-src/src/tools/cargo/Cargo.toml" expected success, got: exit code: 101 failed to run: /tmp/guix-build-rust-1.20.0.drv-0/rustc-1.20.0-src/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap -j1 test src/tools/cargo Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:09:46 command "./x.py" "-j1" "test" "src/tools/cargo" failed with status 1 builder for `/gnu/store/dxrkx2iqr0vhan7m0lfczw3b8rpyw8z8-rust-1.20.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5iXzkACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqeoAf9FLE8iCtanLlFNi2z3enJoBWN3n1KbPsgUe0+2ivCuQyVdFi9HHnzNKuZ wxOwmVdneUQuUjjvajgoEQD6U5CvrH77yG9fSILZrKpSO2ovHcfvXyBp7O4wk3ty zqlF1RkgGSMiijW9xCMXzleaNJEhd2GOZ4CgkiZrOb49xrY8YZq5lspaf5clSljq WUv544/LAYNDt+NKnsrkH7KeYTWSNsM+wPd+rATvGKOjTjRC24Pulb/nbj9o3aGM XlRg2dgdLtCMPHjPkbX/0Qlc9RKv+w3lj0RKZrAzz9eCbrSObYHSrh4n18YIQYgm gwOwAYjj0zoiAsAdbPcq8o27lDeyaQ== =QI30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 31 10:04:12 2020 Received: (at 39949-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2020 14:04:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHUy-0004x0-Mp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:04:12 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHUx-0004wf-QQ for 39949-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:04:12 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BECB5C058B for <39949-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:04:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:04:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=MBUrxL5MmncGUeYXz8hbDrUXK7 kdn0Prl/C0SK2dnpI=; b=nlSZIPHNSCaKWOwHDpjy3jSS+mZXu6va+TFwl5XJl4 VUYMHn/G5tHKYxDwk7n0df7MyrIzglo85ZtyhIiT00fdt+/EMi86H1wW2oWfvz6Y x+A1m6wzkCZlv3/RWU59XS0IAyF2xTOg9od9SUtXTHbvKkfieDSH87JZE295SPEg 6Yrnu//zBvxd7yE7qpalQMuwAb/qd6OfckxO5XbOFQgBh5gQDueJZZaJQYMWxujP n2F6VNBUQbsbvT/8RyuPXTQ+Rin4zAmsi9iJh03HbEBySjPkGbSTWdy3lPGGqsMu o+bNduE0tw7NBOU425RcvMjOUCsquOFjMsj7JRhn+9VA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=MBUrxL 5MmncGUeYXz8hbDrUXK7kdn0Prl/C0SK2dnpI=; b=fXG/FBFi/eskZM9pKrxbVD xdixOcDd/gBdWsLe+wCJxXFD+0f46Mtdoz9F5J/evhgwFd8YVdx3sP1fquwM6LFW oyt3NeznQSuMtSvfmLYp2gICf717zTRDAKgpTa5yU68FFdODRH67l2Hqiu+tUn91 X3ODUZbvp6lK63a7bOtzLxkeM8A4mNPfV3Z6bKNCjn2nRKfDQ6Zb/QfIjxgjwrfa msYlb+arVLIVl0ACyOdNY9PMRcuZwWmlbCQHAJK2Yw5Qp92jWD87KPYsZyCIpcRD tQKBrL28t2+RqonceapbeYT/Pfdqe+XZ3Bu7rddTaoPNpigMQbu1pz3Yefokbikw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrtddtgdefkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehgtderre dtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhushcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshht mhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhm rghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E161C328005E for <39949-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:04:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: 39949-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [core-updates] rust@1.20 fails tests In-Reply-To: <87pndplfie.fsf@devup.no> References: <87pndplfie.fsf@devup.no> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:04:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87a73wvcx8.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39949-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Rust 1.20 fails a test on core-updates, possibly because of the new > version of GNU Make (4.3). > > I suppose we can disable that test for the bootstrap builds as long as > it works for the latest version of Rust. Fixed by giving Rust an earlier version of GNU Make in commit 47cd0febe957b698cc2ae28978bdc3bc89e787f9. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl6DTdMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPp0EQgAwdyFMkUfYgiQKp5J0tAV/I4E8j9DSqwixQGUNmq5OgyDxTLI3jJ9VoDu Aov/6HMqVkL1eOke5D+1SZz04Ih0ylaCxzC4eK3Mj4UyF+PozIYfCvBlGP1uIDJb nHhJ2dSytQ/K02lpvIvss7zzugV+IANX2f9ZxM2L9dKGQUD4tG/k39thqbU1DNl6 XZ1wIRoQs/uTuf4GIY6/GBCKMitRmJotR6VtvhTUPklMU3x37Ukf7pE29pu6sPDF ur0+euBesM67rT5Tglb9I0yhFa6qpWMSP2ArSuUpFLTSEyBaw1FRzIi2MXfPyS6C kwPVBAd2AcuJIsHc8c4RVBcxfWqwyQ== =9dJw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 31 17:46:19 2020 Received: (at 39949) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2020 21:46:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJOiB-0006hb-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:46:19 -0400 Received: from imta-36.everyone.net ([216.200.145.36]:34098 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJOi9-0006hM-CJ for 39949@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:46:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (omta002.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02VLi3o0001095; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:46:14 -0700 X-Eon-Originating-Account: Cn4A4SiZMEmFcO1L5U6I3AC7lcXA4659_cfcK1NBEcI X-Eon-Dm: m0117124.ppops.net Received: by m0117124.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92c75) id m0117124.5e67f957.227801; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:46:12 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJeg7okcbfJIQIAAAAC,775347adb5ba38347cc93cae13a3a806 X-Eip: TsQvb7RPZUovCDaG8JbXQzLa8vePxBX2mXN3J4YPdYI Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 23:46:01 +0200 From: Bengt Richter To: 39949@debbugs.gnu.org, mbakke@fastmail.com Subject: Re: bug#39949: [core-updates] rust@1.20 fails tests Message-ID: <20200331214601.GA3602@LionPure> References: <87pndplfie.fsf@devup.no> <87a73wvcx8.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a73wvcx8.fsf@devup.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_07:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=8 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003310176 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39949 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Hi Marius, On +2020-03-31 16:04:03 +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: > > > Rust 1.20 fails a test on core-updates, possibly because of the new > > version of GNU Make (4.3). > > > > I suppose we can disable that test for the bootstrap builds as long as > > it works for the latest version of Rust. > > Fixed by giving Rust an earlier version of GNU Make in commit > 47cd0febe957b698cc2ae28978bdc3bc89e787f9. ISTM this kind of "fixed" is not the same as e.g. an upstream upgrade that "fixes" "the problem" -- so I'm wondering if work-flow-wise you have a way to tell some upgrade-watching robot to notify you (or your s/w[1]) when the inevitable revision to your "fix" should be done. Are there any general standards for subscribing interest in being notified when a particular package or file gets upgraded/revised/etc in any "distro" your package may be dependent on? [1] Is there such a thing as a derivation/service that sits and waits for such a notification, and maybe sends you a patch when it does get notified? Just curious how the world works :) -- Regards, Bengt Richter From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 02 15:16:38 2020 Received: (at 39949) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2020 19:16:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jK5KP-00068n-Ul for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:16:38 -0400 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:34367) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jK5KO-00068V-Cn for 39949@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:16:36 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF2B6F8; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:16:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:16:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=OhWqfB0I7tvsyEAzcKMVHk0RVa sy4VE/5phk/4nYxgA=; b=cA9QfwXwd1f0I8Y0iG/9vt7FbJ7Ydxj5a+PcRf508s XS4blMMXAQX7t79CJOfUGS0AkTvXYymN+pM0aZgszdCnU4OZ2U6sG2aTyEl/zrn/ 0dPbOBKLvpSu0yUnCdD8GAFjf54c6i53pJEqF0sn5QeV7vH0/oQTsOKJphTkSz+G 0jSLPVUFMmCuvhnSavwZi+MT3zt1wajVovMeyyqwMf0phwDQtpvhhtEInDeKOSYL 6eqCRTJgzg+0/m8OEXc5bkUQhcCNd+QQbJpFFbRQddXYvf5nMlJ568swOgZVOq3H l2OQTGkqQIo3r335BqjW0JTSZ9oJH8EgIh94+KffFUqg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OhWqfB 0I7tvsyEAzcKMVHk0RVasy4VE/5phk/4nYxgA=; b=dk2kfIDBYhFPdP3WHeC/Oy FieaFoulIeoCM6/T6FOjVVfRLXcTIghDGd4/Y3Co3vAm39UIpfTOHrhZxRxp/0/J 5uY9dCJnQ4zzUW6g+ot2SrHd/ZxgmYae8NzsFHdIu76lOBi7++UpityxUSYWBshp Z8Hj2LueXa2j5WdoNDdiwZDHcg8HrxKFD7z6972uaTR4980oUGw89d0EUxMgzKmg RMLGasRF78agTyKsRA1vy7jtFM3fAA8PtYvSTw1qiK6PKNhD+BQUDEJ82N/ehB76 ThzLtpeT7fumuloBu091wZw7EbygBZg1loCGBTlNiMHoUn7Y/g/+MryHtYi2rFKQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrtdeggdduvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesghdtre ertdertdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhiuhhsuceurghkkhgvuceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghs thhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhtlhgrsgdrtghomhdpghhithhhuh gsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeekgedrvddtvddrieekrdejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrd gtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 82D59328005A; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:16:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Bengt Richter , 39949@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#39949: [core-updates] rust@1.20 fails tests In-Reply-To: <20200331214601.GA3602@LionPure> References: <87pndplfie.fsf@devup.no> <87a73wvcx8.fsf@devup.no> <20200331214601.GA3602@LionPure> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 21:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87d08pr94k.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39949 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bengt Richter writes: > Hi Marius, > > On +2020-03-31 16:04:03 +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Marius Bakke writes: >>=20 >> > Rust 1.20 fails a test on core-updates, possibly because of the new >> > version of GNU Make (4.3). >> > >> > I suppose we can disable that test for the bootstrap builds as long as >> > it works for the latest version of Rust. >>=20 >> Fixed by giving Rust an earlier version of GNU Make in commit >> 47cd0febe957b698cc2ae28978bdc3bc89e787f9. > > ISTM this kind of "fixed" is not the same as e.g. an upstream upgrade that > "fixes" "the problem" -- so I'm wondering if work-flow-wise > you have a way to tell some upgrade-watching robot to notify you (or your= s/w[1]) > when the inevitable revision to your "fix" should be done. I don't know of any such service, but would probably use it if it exists! Often fixes are already available in upstream repositories, so it's a matter of locating it and checking the log on the file in question. In this case I was too lazy as Rust 1.20 is already ancient and there is work on bootstrapping 1.29 directly in another issue. > Are there any general standards for subscribing interest in being notified > when a particular package or file gets upgraded/revised/etc in any "distr= o" > your package may be dependent on? I do subscribe to a bunch of mailing lists and Atom feeds to get notified of new releases and encourage others to do the same for packages they care about. Pro tip: both GitLab and GitHub offers release feeds on these URLs: https://gitlab.com/project/package/tags?format=3Datom https://github.com/project/package/releases.atom > [1] Is there such a thing as a derivation/service that sits and waits for= such > a notification, and maybe sends you a patch when it does get notified? > > Just curious how the world works :) IME best way to learn how something works is to take part in it! I have learned a whole lot since I got involved with Guix, both personally and professionally, and don't intend to stop any time soon! :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl6GOgsACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPojogf/cUXtno+s00U27mtHJXAJrS4nCgi9W6vVwfHOl8qy6SaE8P0QJ/RfIhwj //xnG5cwfMmjiGi5xdJDaAwi+brh9KgBQKW4gc15RNThm5QtDWU7ekfWFFDd6BPR gO0u8BAEYaEy7bHr+vh1Mw2smV7erlayCuAUGYs2Ha3UcQgd2Rb2qbeOTeT3emCD 41F8b6UJmzAp8rP+25Kj/PAPxTUlFgZEn349Fd+gybqq61i82LZrT50rFP/486L2 7VwGOsIR/YK0EPacQBNk8YyuUAj3dZjTLCOKvrQL4GaXdfmA1g0k2YHTiANWUfTf vVMCE1ywOsL9bK6sK/jTcUHEDW3RmA== =99UU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:26:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator