GNU bug report logs - #39945
[PATCH 0/1] Introducing 'with-parameters' for gexp dynamic binding

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:42:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #19 received at 39945-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 39945-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39945] [PATCH 0/1] Introducing 'with-parameters' for gexp
 dynamic binding
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:34:03 +0100
Hi Mathieu,

Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com> skribis:

>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Besides, ‘with-parameters’ is the dual of what was discussed at
>> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/29296>.
>
> Super nice! Maybe you could add a test-case involving
> %current-target-system but otherwise this LGTM.

Done and pushed as cf2ac04f13d9266c7c8a2ebd2e85ef593231ac9d.

> Do you think we could use this to get around this issue we discussed
> there:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-12/msg00099.html.

It could be use to achieve the same result as the <native-qemu> package
you proposed:

  #~(… #+(with-parameters ((%current-system %system)) qemu) …)

However, the issue I mentioned before with this approach remain:

  […] now the result of:

    guix system build -s armhf-linux -d …

  would be dependent on the actual system type.  In other words, the
  result would be different if you run it on armhf-linux, if you run it on
  x86_64-linux, or if you run it on i686-linux.  Not great.

Thanks for your feedback!

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 128 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.