GNU bug report logs - #39830
[PATCH] gnu: python-binwalk: Update to 2.2.0

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 00:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39830: closed ([PATCH] gnu: python-binwalk: Update to 2.2.0)
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 13:12:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 1 Mar 2020 14:12:32 +0100
with message-id <20200301131232.clmpfoomu6vbp24e <at> gravity>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] gnu: python-binwalk: Update to 2.2.0
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39830,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: python-binwalk: Update to 2.2.0
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
39830: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39830
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-binwalk: Update to 2.2.0
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:22:49 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Tested by running it on a sample of /lib/firmware/* from another linux
distribution, it found a bunch of binary thingies in there...

-- 
Vincent Legoll

[0001-gnu-python-xyz-Update-to-2.2.0.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 39830-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: python-binwalk: Update to 2.2.0
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 14:12:32 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 01:22:49AM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Tested by running it on a sample of /lib/firmware/* from another linux
> distribution, it found a bunch of binary thingies in there...
Thanks! The commit we were using before was just one behind the release
tag, so it's not really an update. Also, it's not necessary to use a
commit hash when there is a tagged release. See commit
9b9ab657cc9df579cdb2ff9282a7117a86212d31, which I based upon your patch.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 79 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.