From tim.van.holder@pandora.be Thu Jul 30 15:21:40 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Jul 2009 22:21:41 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n6UMLZBa010165 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:21:37 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWe0F-0004zK-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:21:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWe0A-0004xn-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:21:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58012 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWe0A-0004xk-M5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:21:30 -0400 Received: from brigitte.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.66]:49030) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWe0A-0005Gz-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:21:30 -0400 Received: from TIM64 ([94.224.193.214]) by brigitte.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id NNMQ1c0064e0hhq0GNMRgo; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:21:25 +0200 From: Tim Van Holder To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.1; configured frame size not respected Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:21:25 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090730-0, 30/07/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. I have default-frame-alist configured with width=132 and height=70. This has always worked in the past (official emacs 22.1 binary on Win32). However, with emacs 23.1, the initial frame is always the wrong size (hard to tell exactly on Windows, but it looks like 80x40). Same goes if initial-frame-alist gets configured for 132x70. Creating a new frame after the first (C-x 5 2) does create a properly sized frame. In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.2.3790) of 2009-07-30 on SOFT-MJASON Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.2.3790 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4)' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: ENG value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: display-time-mode: t show-paren-mode: t pc-selection-mode: t delete-selection-mode: t tooltip-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t column-number-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: M-x r e p o r Recent messages: Loading delsel...done Loading pc-select...done Loading paren...done Package lazy-lock is obsolete For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Making completion list... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 17 03:18:24 2011 Received: (at 3983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2011 07:18:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4pAL-0000zX-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 03:18:24 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4pAE-0000zC-7e for 3983@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 03:18:16 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4p5T-0004Gu-3S; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:13:19 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Tim Van Holder Subject: Re: 23.1; configured frame size not respected In-Reply-To: (Tim Van Holder's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:21:25 +0200") Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:54:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Various's _Not Alone (3)_: "Charlemagne Palestine - Espoir Guerison" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1R4p5T-0004Gu-3S X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316848399.46258@xkAi0riHvByu5vvPm5ayQA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3983 Cc: 3983@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Tim Van Holder writes: > I have default-frame-alist configured with width=132 and height=70. > This has always worked in the past (official emacs 22.1 binary on Win32). > > However, with emacs 23.1, the initial frame is always the wrong size > (hard to tell exactly on Windows, but it looks like 80x40). Same goes if > initial-frame-alist gets configured for 132x70. > Creating a new frame after the first (C-x 5 2) does create a properly > sized frame. If this bug still exists, could you post an easy-to-reproduce test case? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 18 08:05:15 2011 Received: (at 3983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2011 12:05:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5G7W-0006Xw-Np for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:05:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5G7Q-0006Xj-Mz for 3983@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:05:11 -0400 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6454334wwi.15 for <3983@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=//acMCPBuhu/x8B8Pxx/Ie7SXjmTAgZ1mdrdeyr8hUo=; b=bv1M4b1lhs2bv9f1RjlWiPI43O/x6W6Q6lOjwRfZxqbCDat3vmPnmA4KTiigtvmpUp NKQaWSDWpWWTumTsHmkfXd5zQR9dyHyZJIg7I1SBe++e4KcgY/9MKrATuuSBZ+w+rdVA kpqfGZfLN1v21VVYdHjzrsDJtlXp5/BNvVCps= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.169.133 with SMTP id n5mr1480402wel.59.1316347212466; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.91.80 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:00:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:00:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 23.1; configured frame size not respected From: Tim Van Holder To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3983 Cc: 3983@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) On 17 September 2011 08:54, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Tim Van Holder writes: > >> I have default-frame-alist configured with width=132 and height=70. >> This has always worked in the past (official emacs 22.1 binary on Win32). >> >> However, with emacs 23.1, the initial frame is always the wrong size >> (hard to tell exactly on Windows, but it looks like 80x40). Same goes if >> initial-frame-alist gets configured for 132x70. >> Creating a new frame after the first (C-x 5 2) does create a properly >> sized frame. > > If this bug still exists, could you post an easy-to-reproduce test case? Current version I'm using is 23.1.1. As for the test case: It seems to be face related. Customizing only the default frame alist works fine. But I also have the default face customized, and that seems to mess things up. If I set up my .emacs to contain only (custom-set-variables '(default-frame-alist (quote ((width . 132) (height . 60) (background-color . "black") (foreground-color . "white") (cursor-color . "white"))))) (custom-set-faces '(default ((t (:background "black" :foreground "white" :height 100 :family "outline-lucida console"))))) I see the issue (particularly clear when you do C-x 5 2 - the new frame will be considerably bigger than the first). I'll check if there's a more recent build available, and whether or not that changes anything. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 18 12:22:59 2011 Received: (at 3983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2011 16:22:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5K8w-0007Fo-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:22:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5K8u-0007Fh-JP for 3983@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:22:57 -0400 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6598812wwi.15 for <3983@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3/ybF53xgJrUfrN7eWaC2Izf0IA8b0CZrhz7ETFQARE=; b=g9VuxOOyb9aPO+G2GsPzILLkVa4jeB7pl2uTzveTjAybFw8weMXbBfCsHQx3MQyW8X 1nKPgcBxCVz8ARtRgX3LGdkvue9Ld09ySJDmMV4kkXWSOFD/PdPg6/7E+JpLemsFn885 2DJyx53oSp2aDM1ycj0zLBV4IxaYeltJeWYbY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.14.209 with SMTP id d59mr1040932wed.29.1316362677990; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.91.80 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:17:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 23.1; configured frame size not respected From: Tim Van Holder To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3983 Cc: 3983@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) On 18 September 2011 14:00, Tim Van Holder wrote: > On 17 September 2011 08:54, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Tim Van Holder writes: >> >>> I have default-frame-alist configured with width=132 and height=70. >>> This has always worked in the past (official emacs 22.1 binary on Win32). >>> >>> However, with emacs 23.1, the initial frame is always the wrong size >>> (hard to tell exactly on Windows, but it looks like 80x40). Same goes if >>> initial-frame-alist gets configured for 132x70. >>> Creating a new frame after the first (C-x 5 2) does create a properly >>> sized frame. >> >> If this bug still exists, could you post an easy-to-reproduce test case? > > Current version I'm using is 23.1.1. > > As for the test case: It seems to be face related. Customizing only > the default frame alist works fine. But I also have the default face > customized, and that seems to mess things up. > If I set up my .emacs to contain only > > (custom-set-variables '(default-frame-alist (quote ((width . 132) > (height . 60) (background-color . "black") (foreground-color . > "white") (cursor-color . "white"))))) > (custom-set-faces '(default ((t (:background "black" :foreground > "white" :height 100 :family "outline-lucida console"))))) > > I see the issue (particularly clear when you do C-x 5 2 - the new > frame will be considerably bigger than the first). > > I'll check if there's a more recent build available, and whether or > not that changes anything. I downloaded the latest release available from gnu.org (23.3) and the issue is still present. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 03 13:44:24 2015 Received: (at 3983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2015 18:44:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y7TgV-0004cA-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 13:44:24 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:49755) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y7TgT-0004c2-S5 for 3983@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 13:44:22 -0500 Received: from [194.166.85.1] ([194.166.85.1]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBVwM-1Y0Igp48oA-00AWsm; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:44:18 +0100 Message-ID: <54A83877.1040704@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:44:07 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 3983@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.1; configured frame size not respected Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:g62SukodqQFoo6pNGKh6YoPqbcFDMQpL5o44vtDGrIdb1l5styV tyzjgOtIdYEi4BmZo/l65k6dqGV+z1HPtMI9Yv7wfnpuvSKuS2ZQASrbI3PROoU/84WSMNJ ru8aGLG9ahQEjznqXL+9lMAjvNi2lIdvAxpvYnEUqB9MgB5CyFD2Fb+t7syIcoE9D7JvbQj cSmoP8NEpOWfz7SHJ8waQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3983 Cc: Tim Van Holder X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.2.3790) > of 2009-07-30 on SOFT-MJASON [...] > (custom-set-variables '(default-frame-alist (quote ((width . 132) > (height . 60) (background-color . "black") (foreground-color . > "white") (cursor-color . "white"))))) > (custom-set-faces '(default ((t (:background "black" :foreground > "white" :height 100 :family "outline-lucida console"))))) > > I see the issue (particularly clear when you do C-x 5 2 - the new > frame will be considerably bigger than the first). This should work with current master/trunk. At least, a second frame made with C-x 5 2 has the same size as the initial frame here. Please try again. Thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 13 13:29:11 2015 Received: (at 3983-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2015 18:29:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMKzH-0000Do-8f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:29:11 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMKzF-0000Dc-R9 for 3983-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:29:10 -0500 Received: from [88.117.117.6] ([88.117.117.6]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcBPV-1XvI9t0Qwn-00jZZe; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:29:04 +0100 Message-ID: <54DE4267.9090000@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:28:55 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 3983-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#3983: 23.1; configured frame size not respected References: <54A83877.1040704@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <54A83877.1040704@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gwJACkJbPysL10wRZshPn/Zhnt4S3e78X0JQ7lq2B04k/PW8wUJ ler/OuMnKqRw27hRzetaomxyxTaFGiIudZcW487n6XrajVi5U5W1mcSLnsquqihOkumur+T BPFdcshO4L+zrKFCx36R8Axo2S5DCqaJJJM2ZzjFFial/b4BEEKS93dzRFIUkqfn7DsBk3E eXc6jRpuB7RTnBJHSdtxQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3983-done Cc: Tim Van Holder X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > This should work with current master/trunk. At least, a second frame > made with C-x 5 2 has the same size as the initial frame here. Please > try again. Closing. If you still see the issue please complain. Thanks, martin From unknown Sat Aug 09 15:56:14 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator