GNU bug report logs - #39807
[PATCH] guix: pack: Only wrap executable files.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>

Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 04:55:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 39807 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 39807 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Bavier <bavier <at> member.fsf.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#39807] [PATCH] guix: pack: Only wrap executable files.
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:51:36 +0100
Ping!  :-)

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net> skribis:
>
>> From: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> member.fsf.org>
>>
>> Hello Guix,
>>
>> This patch fixes some uses of relocatable git (e.g.  octopus merge). 
>> Previously, guix pack would wrap all files in "bin", "sbin", and "libexec",
>> even non-executable files.  This would cause issues for git when its shell
>> scripts in libexec would try to source other shell files that had been
>> wrapped and were no longer a valid shell file.
>
> Good catch!
>
>> I feel like a test should be added to tests/guix-pack-relocatable.sh, but
>> I'm not sure how to do that while keeping the test lightweight.  Suggestions
>> welcome.
>
> Not sure how to do that.  Since ‘guix pack’ accepts manifests, you could
> have a manifest containing a ‘computed-file’ with a file that shouldn’t
> be wrapped, and then you could ensure that’s indeed the case.  Or you
> could try with ‘git-minimal’ or some other package that exhibits the
> problem?
>
>> * guix/scripts/pack.scm (wrapped-package)<build>: Build wrappers for
>> executable files and symlink others.
>
> [...]
>
>> -          (for-each build-wrapper
>> -                    (append (find-files (string-append input "/bin"))
>> -                            (find-files (string-append input "/sbin"))
>> -                            (find-files (string-append input "/libexec")))))))
>> +          (receive (executables others)
>
> I’d prefer srfi-11 ‘let-values’.  :-)
>
> Otherwise LGTM, thanks!
>
> Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 207 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.