GNU bug report logs -
#39799
28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly
Previous Next
Reported by: Mike FABIAN <mfabian <at> redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:30:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 28.0.50
Fixed in version 28.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian <at> redhat.com>
> Cc: rpluim <at> gmail.com, rgm <at> gnu.org, 39799 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:27:39 +0200
>
> >> Should that also fix the skin tones?
> >
> > It should, and I thought HarfBuzz on Cairo already supported that?
>
> Yes, and I think my screenshot shows that it does because my Screenshot
> uses Pango (and the rest of the rendering stack including HarfBuzz and
> Cairo).
Now I'm confused: what do you mean here by "it does"? Does Emacs
support that, or does some other program support it? If Emacs, then
why did you just tell there was a problem?
When I said "I thought HarfBuzz on Cairo already supported that", I
meant Emacs that uses HarfBuzz on Cairo. I'm pretty sure we do
support color Emoji in that configuration.
> > Can you try this with hb-view and see if HarfBuzz produces a single
> > glyph/grapheme from this sequence?
>
> $ hb-view --annotate --font-file=/home/mfabian/.fonts/joypixels-6.6/android/joypixels-android.
> ttf --font-size=50 --text="👩🏽"
>
> looks like:
The image looks partial and pixelated. Can you produce PNG or JPEG
or some other color image file, and attach it?
Anyway, if hb-view produces a single glyph, then I guess we need to
debug ftcrfont.c and/or hbfont.c to see why we we produce 2 glyphs in
that case.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 255 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.