GNU bug report logs - #39798
[PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39798: closed ([PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:33:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 07 Oct 2020 17:32:40 +0200
with message-id <87k0w2831j.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#39798] [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39798,
regarding [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
39798: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39798
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:34:42 +0100

Update ghc-pandoc to 2.92 and rename it to pandoc.
This closes bug 33844.

Questions:

- Should this go on staging?  It rebuilds a few hundred packages, maybe less
than 300.
- I'm not 100% sure that updating the Haskell libraries didn't break
anything.  I guess the continuous integration will tell us.
- 3-4 libraries seemed to have many dependents and updating them would break
  stuff, so instead I created a versioned package, e.g. ghc-regex-base-0.94.
  Is this OK?  Is there a best practice here?

Pierre Neidhardt (13):
  gnu: ghc-hsyaml: Update to 0.2.1.0.
  gnu: ghc-doctemplates: Update to 0.8.1.
  gnu: Add ghc-regex-base-0.94.
  gnu: ghc-regex-pcre-builtin: Update to 0.95.1.1.8.43.
  gnu: ghc-skylighting-core: Update to 0.8.3.2.
  gnu: ghc-skylighting: Update to 0.8.3.2.
  gnu: ghc-pandoc-types: Update to 1.20.
  gnu: ghc-texmath: Update to 0.12.0.1.
  gnu: Add ghc-base-compat-0.11.
  gnu: Add ghc-optparse-applicative-0.15.
  gnu: ghc-haddock-library: Update to 1.8.0.
  gnu: ghc-pandoc: Update to 2.9.2.
  gnu: ghc-pandoc: Rename to pandoc.

 gnu/local.mk                                  |   2 -
 gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm                  | 130 ++++++++++++------
 .../patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-html-tests.patch   |  92 -------------
 .../patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-latex-test.patch   |  31 -----
 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-html-tests.patch
 delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-latex-test.patch

-- 
2.25.0

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 39798-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39798] [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc.
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 17:32:40 +0200

Closing with the explanations here:

    <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39798#21>

Thanks,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.