GNU bug report logs -
#39778
[PATCH] checkdoc: Don't mistake "cf." for sentence end
Previous Next
Reported by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:23:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #20 received at 39778 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
>
>>> Is "cf." really so much less common?
>>
>> I think it is, but I won't try to support that as a fact.
While looking into this, I found Writing for Computer Science by
(2004) by Justin Zobel.
"It is often tempting to use abbreviations such as 'no.', 'i.e.',
'e.g.' 'c.f.' and 'w.r.t.' These save little space on the page,
but slow readers down. It is almost always desirable to expand
these abbreviations, to 'number', 'that is', 'for example',
'compared with' (or more accurately 'in contrast to', since that
is the sense in which 'c.f.' should be used), and 'with respect
to', or synonyms of these expressions. Where such abbreviations
are used, the punctuation should be as if the expanded form were
used. Also consider expanding abbreviations such as 'Fig.' and
'Alg.' and don't use concoctions such as '1st' or '2nd'. Months
should not be abbreviated. Make sure that all abbreviations and
acronyms are explained when they are first used." (page 57)
I think the above points should be carefully considered.
> FWIW I think "cf." is pretty common. It also has the advantage
> of being understood by non-english speaker.
That's not the case when it comes to speakers of Swedish. I don't
know this for a fact, but I'd assume that this abbreviation is more
common in the Romance languages.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 130 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.