From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:02:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39771: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 39771 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 39771@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.158257999630848 (code B ref -1); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:34:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2020 21:33:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLo-00081U-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39633) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLm-00081M-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLk-00039i-ER for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:14 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPOOFED_FREEMAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLj-0005Bj-GS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:12 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLj-0005BZ-CM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:11 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D84210D8 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm2; bh=voIlkBK8X4pkWiOqxrU+wjM68nXM0UzP0CZNs/Xy1kI=; b=LO13BldT /Y0v7U2LaM9yIphh6G6gV9VH0hlunLgJnovJh7kBqQhtPx2X0MZWulUsf+aVs2O8 NkKtygjThZUyKSxRPT21HfYd8382E9tctvsAWy7Af9GfNQW085RQN/h3pMkI9j1H VX4KmKM+gsEAJQdCF6EegK8J2MfWjxHMamj2TkxO4h1X8ws9GgEwdSeoXr0nvR2P gaLnn+kWViWq0PwFd62TmRm1qwusuc6Mire+FiaxnvrDlcfsAMC/oMqY3hj9MWFm WdxfjTRqc6ly9lkoqpCwzULvE9qNAee8XGe1fuvELDI3smZTgHx178N+/NJ0MRkq NnXlqsnEX1v06w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=voIlkBK8X4pkWiOqxrU+wjM68nXM0 UzP0CZNs/Xy1kI=; b=Jk/NECtK8Zt1Fwm82wqYs3cI0SHqSvDOSNfV1+yyCRVZS o2tWOgo19npvrlcxwabqkcSL+bTYVsOLeIoudkYrSAZQu6NApdpybZlCEgShgpk9 EO+jXp2otM834rL8VsN/MSHxKRf0beoI+zO/8Uw7NLCeWMzhGpj6xv0HalFiy61A YKT+W28D2j0gLFIVE5AEB8J5G4NI5IvHv4Lkltg2rMORdWMwAV3FBNDXWyz6bDoA i/Ifom5ARomxqtlVW3WYiWSc/iILX6fq7Ue7nyCuIw2xB2h5s2ax84/qgtwur1WP PgzsZ05FqRAJWWXhgFeCotvOIEuT+EI8wPcBN4CfA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrledtgdduhedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkgggtsehgtderredttd dtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhushcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgr ihhlrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghi lhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70E8F328005E for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:10 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:33:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.29 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello, There is a strange bug on the core-updates branch: if you 'guix pull --branch=core-updates', everything from around 'guile-bootstrap@2.0' in the package graph will have different derivations from what you get in the git checkout: On my local fork of core-updates: ./pre-inst-env guix build -d bash /gnu/store/y834q3sf056hkglpli4gr3ijmpvgzb7c-bash-5.0.16.drv After 'guix pull -p /tmp/core-updates --url=/my/checkout --branch=core-updates', on the same commit: /tmp/core-updates/bin/guix build -d bash /gnu/store/m3q1w669f7br5cs4admdy5p8rijrjmvp-bash-5.0.16.drv I believe this is a recent regression (probably the wip-bootstrap changes?), as I've pulled (and reconfigured) on the branch before. Any idea what is going on here? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5UQRQACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrpjwgApwmHqMlSMkmUviPZGeOkLqbXNMj2++7T/QQZLAxqWi5kQ8VdQ6eIxnF7 MU1VnrCo94tvIE1ozHJmlm2FlHymwXUqtbd+3vNrtDkv+CcknasUf0qYujYLc7V5 G87M+d5gy/j1kG2ibrmaDS2OONIP/Ujl/HxbaOR6U7CeXKkYFN9MpQKzUV/hW9WI LXUAZyor4SRi0dWQyTpTCUE2BGzD5IloNN0TdJoFG1Gk+m2GGIwq8uSigchfCf57 xG3mWJetXjyWHYOkpGSrlwIw1120avmdURALoqQjult1ihv7NwIAEqYxyWeOQvDb VTh2jkiqWPc+JebHD6N8cWPekhd/1g== =RaJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:02:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39771: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39771 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 39771@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Timothy Sample Received: via spool by 39771-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39771.158317290615926 (code B ref 39771); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 39771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2020 18:15:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8pas-00048o-0S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:15:06 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:60729) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8paq-000482-G4 for 39771@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:15:05 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B6C21B74; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:14:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:14:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=2TAQQZ1/+6PpMOGU17a2n/Ej9h WdMv3r5Spx5KXILRI=; b=I2wMdC9hYz7yTIpP+4vwYKVEKW3ovrYo3juTmBfmIV hmdwoBGrafupe54XWFbhh50zVZeG9uYuLj+8Mt6uX5oVG9d9G4OBLtztMm6RH4yD xNG5eFZbvkOF1K9y0iMqjMuaCUFFPYL+OUsqzLZiB8o1X6+RRNcKEHBqQ5kT1QEz 0+A05w8GL+hu+QpNNp9zOtaPgvY9XD8Ajy8rfUo/OpoO8Psh0FD9lCJH2KxrI45S OFWhAw24JQzND/zTmPQbz7w+GFoC70kmADjii3GE04XapT6ahzcJXJlf9fRKHX1s vvejbW1QzopcixB/hHG332f3V/F21rf6aMUrQBJ7emqQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=2TAQQZ 1/+6PpMOGU17a2n/Ej9hWdMv3r5Spx5KXILRI=; b=dRe2H2EXRpv9QlhghkK01w UGrv+htWxO7/rX7kLzfy4vy2j5nPFXLbgU5Rqk7U/Z/PCRsW1sVkawPoVuCSC0K0 TOhx+Q5DUW9lCfLIAtV4GDNWEDia6OGcQ6VF1mg35wjsfdEm6zXsBL2Oit5y81U0 0YajFuSK3OejB8gSlNNuoPTz7kAH+UiDHykMM0kXZR2CmPae3k2I0gL+vhy1z++R wD4GiJiuuGFiyYyroWuE9g0vCvKHFimIp0IPdMvE1D5gxzUEG2IobE5I18rYyx8N 4ocXoc38tGa3t4qNeIH54281rtfEtRrab5chcfXPlJIvFPNqTOTT/gffLr/66niw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddtgedgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesghdtreertdertdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhi uhhsuceurghkkhgvuceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ekgedrvddtvddrieekrdejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 570FE3060D1A; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:14:57 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> References: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 19:14:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87imjmk4ip.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Hello, > > There is a strange bug on the core-updates branch: if you 'guix pull > --branch=core-updates', everything from around 'guile-bootstrap@2.0' in > the package graph will have different derivations from what you get in > the git checkout: > > On my local fork of core-updates: > > ./pre-inst-env guix build -d bash > /gnu/store/y834q3sf056hkglpli4gr3ijmpvgzb7c-bash-5.0.16.drv > > After 'guix pull -p /tmp/core-updates --url=/my/checkout > --branch=core-updates', on the same commit: > > /tmp/core-updates/bin/guix build -d bash > /gnu/store/m3q1w669f7br5cs4admdy5p8rijrjmvp-bash-5.0.16.drv I've tracked this down to 'gash-boot'. Namely the use of ,(version): it evaluates to '2.2.6' when run with ./pre-inst-env and "3.0.0" after 'guix pull'. I suspect both are wrong, and that it really intends to use the version of gash here. Timothy, can you confirm? Currently trying to 'guix pull' with a hard coded "2.2.6" version to see if other instances need changing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5dTR4ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpvjwgAq8xf5UVSPsQ0vpuu2F5rXql6sgHXHI7RsM0Iq3QeHgYl4dI+h3rOBNpy GkhUe59KfBoqHjDPiRo3xZ6AnzdcO0PnXtC0qfmEyPvZeMTM+p+gxNIf4vwZMCNU dVm7o+CgAFdGgKfzjIojYjDaxEWxVu2MOdhLtd4dYR33RpKTWDXWk8jwXYoTXcDK 96xS056hHF8cvY3jutuATyJv02mteu7KEexsa31G5yPb3bYG8oeYiLbiBPj5Dhea t8Prxe6TP2evH5YKQeT11Ga0uBvVjNrkYz54z12uPnAjOXC2BUVeZ2UCiStvpvIy 2B8Zz/stmMTdKkIvJyDzaNC1zR/gNA== =oce6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:02:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39771: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39771 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 39771@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Timothy Sample Received: via spool by 39771-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39771.15831806233260 (code B ref 39771); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 39771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2020 20:23:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8rbK-0000qW-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:23:42 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:41839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8rbJ-0000qK-7R for 39771@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:23:41 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F05223DD; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:23:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:23:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=Uv2+NwTWxa4WO32hccadAl3515 L4GC37OR3bS6nHFXk=; b=jWnwU64TgFGCjkgWf8qdSS6OMU87Gaamzh/BX2Fwyr n1g1izo7q9SBRRYW1KYFaF5m+gc1MM7GftwDLv9ylguV67bG2zBzob6UGOniy4Eg 8hJvLXdbpL4ome663GvsofSHJsBXWljbfKutuRyw6/TYsCDtBnLl0svyjYoHFVS0 A2fEU2UGJSFf4/30p7zdWAMuMq+0MWSiDhV3Egi4d+lYFNiX2CLpf4Jl3z+uyJzU /WgZza3U/OkdHCO8dWcAq9ne+LVxYjhARUaW1/18zmjSVp8efswMPbQI2byDT/el G6HhZCRnLRqHWVOLl4i+RqZ4OSj27FFELuva+fnxOBhw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Uv2+Nw TWxa4WO32hccadAl3515L4GC37OR3bS6nHFXk=; b=QdiRRf39bVtzk7615pxrXI Xm82PQ8hT3CJUfabbLDM9WRcFPtoaUp69BgfU/wO+YDb3MzkkTW9LINqpCgeCibH qjIrqMqzZXPJfNaaGQOfcywFh/SHuyC/dMgFBrLw+T+h0mVbzQfohLkW+89D3pO+ Jgq3lP99C16M9uFZLRtwcA//ilX4eXay5bolvXIwx/z41/6PibRMzyzoiHjj0lbA HPv0Hbow5yvn145txcEJr/61/MhQ7jUGHa6PLEb7XU089GN23GMT7ySaIXDmeh/E Uev6fMI5akfI/I/Gsoqv/UrbQ1pMlHj3H+PEVlqfYiu8RPm5s3qAn3gzc9TA/mXQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddtgedgudefjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesghdtreertdertdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhi uhhsuceurghkkhgvuceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ekgedrvddtvddrieekrdejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3E495306130A; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:23:35 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87imjmk4ip.fsf@devup.no> References: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> <87imjmk4ip.fsf@devup.no> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87d09ujykb.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Hello, >> >> There is a strange bug on the core-updates branch: if you 'guix pull >> --branch=core-updates', everything from around 'guile-bootstrap@2.0' in >> the package graph will have different derivations from what you get in >> the git checkout: >> >> On my local fork of core-updates: >> >> ./pre-inst-env guix build -d bash >> /gnu/store/y834q3sf056hkglpli4gr3ijmpvgzb7c-bash-5.0.16.drv >> >> After 'guix pull -p /tmp/core-updates --url=/my/checkout >> --branch=core-updates', on the same commit: >> >> /tmp/core-updates/bin/guix build -d bash >> /gnu/store/m3q1w669f7br5cs4admdy5p8rijrjmvp-bash-5.0.16.drv > > I've tracked this down to 'gash-boot'. Namely the use of ,(version): it > evaluates to '2.2.6' when run with ./pre-inst-env and "3.0.0" after > 'guix pull'. > > I suspect both are wrong, and that it really intends to use the version > of gash here. Timothy, can you confirm? > > Currently trying to 'guix pull' with a hard coded "2.2.6" version to > see if other instances need changing. This patch solves the problem without triggering a full rebuild: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=diff diff --git a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm index cfbb5e3bff..0d5bfa4dfa 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ pure Scheme to Tar and decompression in one easy step.") (use-modules (guix build gnu-bootstrap)) (modify-phases %standard-phases (replace 'configure - (bootstrap-configure ,(version) "gash" "scripts")) + (bootstrap-configure "2.2.6" "gash" "scripts")) (replace 'build (bootstrap-build "gash")) (replace 'install (bootstrap-install "gash" "scripts")) (add-after 'install 'install-symlinks @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ pure Scheme to Tar and decompression in one easy step.") (delete-file "scripts/template.in") #t)) (replace 'configure - (bootstrap-configure ,(version) "gash" "scripts")) + (bootstrap-configure "2.2.6" "gash" "scripts")) (replace 'build (bootstrap-build "gash")) (replace 'install (bootstrap-install "gash" "scripts")) ;; XXX: The scripts should add Gash to their load paths and --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I have another full-rebuild commit in the pipeline (bzip2 currently keeps a reference to the Mes toolchain), so we might as well fix it properly. Waiting for confirmation from Timothy as to what the proper fix is, though. --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5da0QACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoJmggAvH2TdXhyvF5Jw6sPJIjkBmXQSzdkfdWWpK1Uz3aXRIcJIkbxOhxxguMc 7Y+o4rwJKrw6Nf/fDcxl+PPCZ2ozVpa5/jYjOFAwJ3u8TzsxMl1/Emn+/8Dr0Ndp //44GMNKQTY+TYz57vxYaBKgRu2yNhc3pmuquvfyQvnEqVbrJ8lEyB4k0c/HhA00 S3pbyaPANM6MfN6sMkHwcLt3G6aN6cplpH3kM+QwGfBFTWdtM65cChb9xrilyMsu ffNbqc6p9EqKT4hRBXLoOHTH2rUK1emfo2C6AneVpLeMTXo/+b8+DBhG5E5r9fql pwqB78K/+jRSsepSrHd+sSmvbpB6VA== =6Z3c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:02:57 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#39771: closed (Re: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations) Message-ID: References: <87pnduwdvn.fsf@ngyro.com> <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 39771 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 39771@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 23:13:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1583190782-26601-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1583190782-26601-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #39771: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different = derivations which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 39771@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 39771: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D39771 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1583190782-26601-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 39771-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2020 23:12:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8uEG-0006tk-Ax for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:12:04 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:41067) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j8uEE-0006tE-Pc for 39771-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:12:03 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B698214DB; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:11:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:11:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+6MXBGGyXTDJrOH3Nx9AaH4W4IvgjKyNqY2DOtMCQ 0Y=; b=DmWj2J7Tq/vVQR3cP3bjwO4cnKeCRKkhNAWmT584IVXOt5UktpJqKstTp Tsgpj7OYrCSJrRlese/26zHNxMeAZadUAfn6JWFGToCwhUGmDFgTmG9xEHeRAMaz 5YvKm/0ZApzqXNvTinEZO3jG0ITb2+C7Jr4mKqWeUX0YH3dSg0IDtWWcvhbf4c0o RoEQ4skIeWpFHfeI1vc3wlgqFkpAqwFMZlkg6A+tEjeHEgB9JWMOBkhPbOD+dgLC YkvPAjI13qhBUWTh0lI97+Mtk2sH2plJyng8R4rpeorOz+4xLi2Ub5fKMdfA27wX zkCJhBJeHHtw855pURnp6xeaHXhow== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddthedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhimhho thhhhicuufgrmhhplhgvuceoshgrmhhplhgvthesnhhghihrohdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ejgedrudduiedrudekiedrgeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepshgrmhhplhgvthesnhhghihrohdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from mrblack (74-116-186-44.qc.dsl.ebox.net [74.116.186.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DC077306130A; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:11:56 -0500 (EST) From: Timothy Sample To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations References: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> <87imjmk4ip.fsf@devup.no> <87d09ujykb.fsf@devup.no> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:11:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d09ujykb.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:23:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87pnduwdvn.fsf@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39771-done Cc: 39771-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Marius, Marius Bakke writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> >> I've tracked this down to 'gash-boot'. Namely the use of ,(version): it >> evaluates to '2.2.6' when run with ./pre-inst-env and "3.0.0" after >> 'guix pull'. >> >> I suspect both are wrong, and that it really intends to use the version >> of gash here. Timothy, can you confirm? Definitely wrong! I think I had somehow convinced myself that the version of Gash was available when inheriting but delayed via a thunk. The fact that it happily returns the current Guile version means that I never noticed how wrong I was. Sorry! >> Currently trying to 'guix pull' with a hard coded "2.2.6" version to >> see if other instances need changing. > > This patch solves the problem without triggering a full rebuild: > > [...] > > I have another full-rebuild commit in the pipeline (bzip2 currently > keeps a reference to the Mes toolchain), so we might as well fix it > properly. > > Waiting for confirmation from Timothy as to what the proper fix is, > though. It should be using =E2=80=9Cpackage-version=E2=80=9D to get the versions fr= om the parent packages. Fixed in 0b870f7915f5da43758753fd088a22033936dc50. -- Tim ------------=_1583190782-26601-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2020 21:33:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLo-00081U-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39633) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLm-00081M-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLk-00039i-ER for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:14 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPOOFED_FREEMAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLj-0005Bj-GS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:12 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6LLj-0005BZ-CM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:11 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D84210D8 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm2; bh=voIlkBK8X4pkWiOqxrU+wjM68nXM0UzP0CZNs/Xy1kI=; b=LO13BldT /Y0v7U2LaM9yIphh6G6gV9VH0hlunLgJnovJh7kBqQhtPx2X0MZWulUsf+aVs2O8 NkKtygjThZUyKSxRPT21HfYd8382E9tctvsAWy7Af9GfNQW085RQN/h3pMkI9j1H VX4KmKM+gsEAJQdCF6EegK8J2MfWjxHMamj2TkxO4h1X8ws9GgEwdSeoXr0nvR2P gaLnn+kWViWq0PwFd62TmRm1qwusuc6Mire+FiaxnvrDlcfsAMC/oMqY3hj9MWFm WdxfjTRqc6ly9lkoqpCwzULvE9qNAee8XGe1fuvELDI3smZTgHx178N+/NJ0MRkq NnXlqsnEX1v06w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=voIlkBK8X4pkWiOqxrU+wjM68nXM0 UzP0CZNs/Xy1kI=; b=Jk/NECtK8Zt1Fwm82wqYs3cI0SHqSvDOSNfV1+yyCRVZS o2tWOgo19npvrlcxwabqkcSL+bTYVsOLeIoudkYrSAZQu6NApdpybZlCEgShgpk9 EO+jXp2otM834rL8VsN/MSHxKRf0beoI+zO/8Uw7NLCeWMzhGpj6xv0HalFiy61A YKT+W28D2j0gLFIVE5AEB8J5G4NI5IvHv4Lkltg2rMORdWMwAV3FBNDXWyz6bDoA i/Ifom5ARomxqtlVW3WYiWSc/iILX6fq7Ue7nyCuIw2xB2h5s2ax84/qgtwur1WP PgzsZ05FqRAJWWXhgFeCotvOIEuT+EI8wPcBN4CfA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrledtgdduhedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkgggtsehgtderredttd dtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhushcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgr ihhlrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghi lhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70E8F328005E for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:33:10 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:33:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.29 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello, There is a strange bug on the core-updates branch: if you 'guix pull --branch=core-updates', everything from around 'guile-bootstrap@2.0' in the package graph will have different derivations from what you get in the git checkout: On my local fork of core-updates: ./pre-inst-env guix build -d bash /gnu/store/y834q3sf056hkglpli4gr3ijmpvgzb7c-bash-5.0.16.drv After 'guix pull -p /tmp/core-updates --url=/my/checkout --branch=core-updates', on the same commit: /tmp/core-updates/bin/guix build -d bash /gnu/store/m3q1w669f7br5cs4admdy5p8rijrjmvp-bash-5.0.16.drv I believe this is a recent regression (probably the wip-bootstrap changes?), as I've pulled (and reconfigured) on the branch before. Any idea what is going on here? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5UQRQACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrpjwgApwmHqMlSMkmUviPZGeOkLqbXNMj2++7T/QQZLAxqWi5kQ8VdQ6eIxnF7 MU1VnrCo94tvIE1ozHJmlm2FlHymwXUqtbd+3vNrtDkv+CcknasUf0qYujYLc7V5 G87M+d5gy/j1kG2ibrmaDS2OONIP/Ujl/HxbaOR6U7CeXKkYFN9MpQKzUV/hW9WI LXUAZyor4SRi0dWQyTpTCUE2BGzD5IloNN0TdJoFG1Gk+m2GGIwq8uSigchfCf57 xG3mWJetXjyWHYOkpGSrlwIw1120avmdURALoqQjult1ihv7NwIAEqYxyWeOQvDb VTh2jkiqWPc+JebHD6N8cWPekhd/1g== =RaJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1583190782-26601-1-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:02:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39771: [core-updates] 'guix pull' and './pre-inst-env' produces different derivations Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 21:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39771 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 39771@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: samplet@ngyro.com, mbakke@fastmail.com Received: via spool by 39771-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39771.158370117620850 (code B ref 39771); Sun, 08 Mar 2020 21:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 39771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2020 20:59:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jB31M-0005QE-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:59:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36089) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jB31L-0005Q1-7q for 39771@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:59:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jB31G-0006Cu-1G; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:59:30 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=36852 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jB31F-00061U-GM; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:59:29 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87a7574qnf.fsf@devup.no> <87imjmk4ip.fsf@devup.no> <87d09ujykb.fsf@devup.no> <87pnduwdvn.fsf@ngyro.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 19 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 21:59:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pnduwdvn.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:11:56 -0500") Message-ID: <87eeu28swf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! Timothy Sample skribis: > It should be using =E2=80=9Cpackage-version=E2=80=9D to get the versions = from the parent > packages. Fixed in 0b870f7915f5da43758753fd088a22033936dc50. Alternately, you can write: (arguments `(=E2=80=A6 ,(package-version this-package) =E2=80=A6)) so that the version number remains correct when inheriting (=E2=80=98this-package=E2=80=99 is a self reference.) Ludo=E2=80=99.