GNU bug report logs - #39706
28.0.50; Search prefix nroff-mode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:11:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 39706 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39706: 28.0.50; Search prefix nroff-mode
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:42:07 +0200
> From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> Cc: 39706 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:39:00 +0200
> 
> > Thanks.  I'm okay with the change, but I think it should be called out
> > in NEWS as an incompatible change, with an explanation why we did
> > that.
> 
> Pushed to master with NEWS and removed the task from admin/release-process.

Thanks.

> Not sure what to do with other remaining tasks in admin/release-process:
> 
> 1. Gnus binds 'M-s' to 'gnus-summary-search-article-forward'.
> 
> 2. Minibuffer binds 'M-s' to 'next-matching-history-element'
>    (not useful any more since C-s can now search in the history).
> 
> 3. PCL-CVS binds 'M-s' to 'cvs-status', and log-edit-mode binds it to
>    'log-edit-comment-search-forward'.  Perhaps search commands
>    on the global key binding 'M-s' are useless in these modes.
> 
> 4. Rmail binds '\es' to 'rmail-search'/'rmail-summary-search'.

IMO, only Gnus is popular enough to worry about.  Lars, any
suggestions?




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 364 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.