From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 20 08:48:28 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2020 13:48:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mBn-0000XK-PO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:48:28 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mBl-0000XC-S4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:48:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mBk-0003LY-9e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:48:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RECEIVED_FROM_WINDOWS_HOST,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mBh-0008WK-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:48:22 -0500 Received: from mail-eopbgr30124.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.3.124]:36326 helo=EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mBh-0008J4-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:48:21 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gJAdN/pX6wdSVg6xo9xcKnKSl62htjbDB8uESjXGnnNwsmmK5u/lBIgAU2FGvpYBk7rV6GAucGmbUmep0P5mRIJWwSSkdxPBZA5IjN6FEKeBkNIRub8VTY9fUGtUYrlSsnqt8fm28EUi6vbX1c+nJkn5UQkxQYZWUT0DaH78eP+sNFEV7sJr15v4CpE6ZMkbU7rGGO6K3OxPE1wP6alyoT8hQr2uMBznnx4MyO78KUnCvznJ3JUeLIlu2pXDu57fvdoxrvFh3yRDchu8tvxDxYz41LuCRMQJnaazzolIjdambKtPdG8TdfDoGW8EincBhK9QWBMxqqREawY3ei3HcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PPmAIdodWkXsYoC001XnOfq7xHtRAnREbV/AsLqJw3s=; b=oA/Oy/b5sA8izwOtRVMzAk3adHh7ITmXu0T+IKa84pRA6kIfnK6o+CzshxFZYFkG4n6YdduVNMc2GBg0+W2Fj4D786BELrzgpVvHWsuq8pvRVaXuo2AvX/KYqlLVtLuRCLfTPOQEmHQgKsOu6iPew5iihJqBibOiHcB/Z/OpLHEkuOCy/SklYS3vKP6R+oXIq8/CitYKdG4aOmu4sWWgIw5cDd4Rq1lCwcpRzqWtl575I5P/Sx/tG9TqHdxSJlEblv63HtuSVl31nrR9bwQCfkHaNl104ZMf52s6cxQOi+zMIx1RXWmrwa36bY6GtDSeFgY+hXYkzhftmmpZ43Bk3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uninett.no; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uninett.no; dkim=pass header.d=uninett.no; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uninett.no; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PPmAIdodWkXsYoC001XnOfq7xHtRAnREbV/AsLqJw3s=; b=qSjzXVtK5b4x3FrByzRaZYr4mvp3ibSPSQgKdDN/ZoVCvahJ6IR6gtGKNcdai+aN7rb10hjYlue3aQ0ykppZiRu1H+uri7CWnRJ3g0Y9d9mt4gdHzq7FbwZwxo9E9hKLWtlrFqcWmqrdFECqRnrxd0qD9V8rIjKypZARDtkXeRs= Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=vegard.vesterheim@uninett.no; Received: from DB8PR08MB5371.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (52.133.240.199) by DB8PR08MB5497.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (52.133.242.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:48:12 +0000 Received: from DB8PR08MB5371.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::90df:7291:d61:4354]) by DB8PR08MB5371.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::90df:7291:d61:4354%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.033; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:48:12 +0000 From: Vegard Vesterheim To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 26.3; browse-url-mail not supporting RFC6068 (UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding) Organization: UNINETT AS Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:48:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: HE1P195CA0020.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:3:fd::30) To DB8PR08MB5371.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:114::7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from voll (2001:700:1:0:158:38:62:13) by HE1P195CA0020.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:3:fd::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:48:11 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2001:700:1:0:158:38:62:13] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 26d8cbbb-2f2d-4a49-dd26-08d7b60b86fe X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB8PR08MB5497: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7219; X-Forefront-PRVS: 031996B7EF X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(39840400004)(346002)(366004)(136003)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(8936002)(6666004)(66476007)(66556008)(36756003)(44832011)(2616005)(2906002)(66946007)(6486002)(508600001)(5660300002)(52116002)(6916009)(16526019)(36916002)(6496006)(86362001)(786003)(316002)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB8PR08MB5497; H:DB8PR08MB5371.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: uninett.no does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 22mDITXM6VB1pGVEe+p2sliPTr5rDvJZ7PkHhbuhukk+WEoltpl5/S2Jk23k06/6BfnOMdgR+VCSnebAbJOsOPEFPQuaoyz9IgezHa3vpOw6U10/iPpI9k8eyMAY6uE+8p/rngth3CxpFKKG2r34hJ3hlCPvbE+J4IHdwlDiuegErIwvcu8OZjhWD4FWC+VDGf631raVHN1uWHisT5jBtEhHXfHU88dnL/9LSFmYhjCOn2y4ucNg/GnW+7vE5xEo1lhqOQfFaSjHcGThQPJ4oNA4gysR367DZhWAAi0Caegt8lt5oXW4zGx5w8Cs+SeUDT1V3jOTT8W6GW4t8I47jtkbalHYk3OIeTEsVdYsN91LakQk5C2+6jic2SNXUNSHh6NiZcutQp3DLDLy+WrmVKdnQasaiF2hABhEMfL2VqdSA966DiIGbDsH7hFkFvtp X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: R20va9UenN+t2hhPB2WRwUSqzyOl+YN31MuQUCNAlN6ABVfP45jFDjbUSJM8qo88W0T+A6ygmpHXh8BgxpghmgPU5181FbQvY7ibrKqdhfsWqNy+nLhGG0kWfScCWdKAfiJIIqLgToUxUU9jZN7OHRavOKUNa1TevROKYxvV4NQ6Dm3xiMDga99+zNjIvciX X-OriginatorOrg: uninett.no X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 26d8cbbb-2f2d-4a49-dd26-08d7b60b86fe X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2020 13:48:12.2746 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 68763e3d-4615-4222-988f-90ba13e351e9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: wCu9ZJxLJvzy6muoBqdA/9XN4K+1KbGpyc2AVoc9Cr7P+JFBaP8NP+ca0pmoVkPouGZkAa6EKmmE4r/h8e8z2Q== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB8PR08MB5497 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 40.107.3.124 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Emacs does not seem to correctly handle UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding as illustrated in Chapter 6.2 from RFC6068. The command=20 emacs -Q -l browse-url -eval '(browse-url-mail "mailto:user@example.org?= subject=3Dcaf%C3%A9&body=3Dcaf%C3%A9")' should result in a message buffer with the string "caf=C3=A9" insterted int= o the body part of the message. Instead the string "caf=C3=83=C2=A9" is inserted. I am running Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. M-x emacs-version returns: "GNU Emacs 26.3 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.30) of 2= 019-09-16"=20 $ locale -a | grep -i utf C.UTF-8 en_AG.utf8 en_AU.utf8 en_BW.utf8 en_CA.utf8 en_DK.utf8 en_GB.utf8 en_HK.utf8 en_IE.utf8 en_IL.utf8 en_IN.utf8 en_NG.utf8 en_NZ.utf8 en_PH.utf8 en_SG.utf8 en_US.utf8 en_ZA.utf8 en_ZM.utf8 en_ZW.utf8 nb_NO.utf8 $ env | grep LC LC_MEASUREMENT=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_PAPER=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_ADDRESS=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_TELEPHONE=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=3Den_US.UTF-8 LC_TIME=3Dnb_NO.utf8 $ env | grep LANG LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8 GDM_LANG=3Den NLS_LANG=3DNORWEGIAN_NORWAY.WE8ISO8859P1 LANGUAGE=3Den -- Vennlig hilsen/Best regards Vegard Vesterheim Senior Software engineer +47 48 11 98 98 vegard.vesterheim@uninett.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 27 05:51:47 2020 Received: (at 39689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2020 10:51:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Gle-0001KW-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:51:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:55249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Glb-0001KG-CC for 39689@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:51:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z12so2943259wmi.4 for <39689@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:51:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJ4gf6VJCWGPi7/Nl/QNUV4tNYo+ZabPMeUpcN3UyVE=; b=LMypHs+WWaDCcepHS6L2jawE1ufOjA8j+CZiZc17CSSS8LiXiPDHQK+jLPQq+nP0Br yBWQ61NaaCrW4CnFUB4xKxw7Mm+a78F4exgb+Mw+3W9ZCE6vcvUXh3EMq9nMBcPAD9jv HhNfLkkI9X6Bbd+WNcVV1gOmiilp+T7ap5gifUlT9MC9G0Sgw4NdXDtnbiZDy/BkymH7 DMLisXzO99YtvGobHU23p3O7ZBbHt7BcuYKmybQ2HIMaDwFeJJydUHLzPVfXLre0fQEE nZLpC3FMx3sSD1yDov4WISu6Zky66GisVWcUJpEKw+Ez9T+3jBDF08MLlTrFtGYNFZsk E20w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJ4gf6VJCWGPi7/Nl/QNUV4tNYo+ZabPMeUpcN3UyVE=; b=I3xDYgBfAH483fyP75QwPD8tsCMe5VSQaK1OPp/foeI0PagYbiJ36ya7KpC5ihoZUV N3X2NxSVC/By9mvE3DzbYfNoXBP7YOiE7p1tv98ItX2yLAnj3Td4H4ZlV1qaMCaVmVKb yls/qJ6BCa1bz6HIVlKkAHNLk4NnAKcFn0UolJReqxOEKMOZSMsGSb2Xs78wHRNKE88R pnVQYMHhLIgDEfhwgiQEeB23Rp2GtdoSUNkcSMTwKtt3NfLwo0GR1ICbxREhUlIlvfEw qZisJF6YRdnN3AbSHRUj5QxP50OCBA3mlkYhvYgVyfeTx88VqWEH5EU7ix0gfm1vZqW3 Xn2g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUi/Ka0dENOwCHPM8iyVyNzrPy4mdXKR4H6TPKXrOWIoccZywUk 2qhJiUH3iKJ+DhOeTJXGJLA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzsTNIOG8NpiEY/vtkEHaK5gJx8Pmxh19Zq8TizBaW6Jo6ym4Sk9EFihPyDfkNZVsuBdubBVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2255:: with SMTP id a21mr1707558wmm.79.1582800697336; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:51:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rpluim-mac ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m21sm7051882wmi.27.2020.02.27.02.51.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:51:36 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Pluim To: Vegard Vesterheim Subject: Re: bug#39689: 26.3; browse-url-mail not supporting RFC6068 (UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding) References: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:51:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> (Vegard Vesterheim via's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:48:54 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39689 Cc: 39689@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:48:54 +0100, Vegard Vesterheim via "Bug report= s for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" said: Vegard> Emacs does not seem to correctly handle UTF-8-Based Percent-Enc= oding as Vegard> illustrated in Chapter 6.2 from RFC6068. Vegard> The command=20 Vegard> emacs -Q -l browse-url -eval '(browse-url-mail "mailto:user@= example.org?subject=3Dcaf%C3%A9&body=3Dcaf%C3%A9")' Vegard> should result in a message buffer with the string "caf=C3=A9" i= nsterted into the Vegard> body part of the message. Instead the string "caf=C3=83=C2=A9" = is inserted. Yes, the assumption in rfc2368-unhexify-string is that percent escaping is being done of ASCII characters. epg--decode-percent-escape-as-utf-8 in epg.el does the right thing, it could be renamed and moved. I think rfc2047 decoding needs doing on the result as well. Lars, should I just stick these in rfc2368.el but named something like rfc6068-unhexify-string and rfc6068-decode-2047-string or something? Robert From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 27 10:08:34 2020 Received: (at 39689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2020 15:08:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7KmA-0006md-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:08:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:41466) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Km8-0006mP-VH for 39689@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:08:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id v4so3764322wrs.8 for <39689@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:08:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UNcHwk8gL2l+gmt/Mnq6NDRorYIEFhycYcmA/M1AC0M=; b=MZp298Sd5Pm7iFbUXabDLfERiZkNj+KWVqxQXE9tDLKQHAgheMLKKZBH9cHhwRZwh3 WzJE+aqjKHSOFUnORjKVHa2gSjTnvdtRB+m9a6S5BqIVkW+Yd/5KVbqFxmWBrYEGNTY9 pY2ssnmvfwykYHeq0w5mXlas4Qg+WzR+4y5i5CccRRAQ7mvwUCBCrerwlCiNhoqH9Vsn W/Jf9VvAEsRh3V9uwqIvqCr8uFNmuaRRaMtFmy4vUwMBglpjUjnVopdeqAzXeSCqa+bX CRnztlzhuup9352T9/k9ZID/LpuNGRx9Vv++mKrme4ESRvCfx/cX9u8FoBto5sCZgyLU 6w+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UNcHwk8gL2l+gmt/Mnq6NDRorYIEFhycYcmA/M1AC0M=; b=Sp4ltssNaZ99JHed+xIgD+kg5zutTh+FrOH5Ub5+NOQH5Y5wTZDONOHIrFNgKfjbvS ADsuA19gV6MDucqMH2UcRglVIZtOx2saqx/xjNcadLjyU7Gs7XflJWEpQVKVOh/4uoeO peslkjbwIyijWRatVpZctEXqvGwkU565P6ZcfBnSIZ45LhZdCC6MZbaWYQ8nfjlyoMI+ ERCaqTjZUt5ih8fGoiPFV6BaDgg7OKfcdUlrdi1NadaY4gkLBQ6zWjEBSQmBuqHdEuXS 8IaeS0EK8esfVNkKInIKey7BEMf98rcLdaOXx/yrjnJ8M39VgSvCjny43yiQlnXQQsEo /Y2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTCFLG11HQTjNVUBZ7BVkWMb9dGnngNMIy4ZM5laOou+qBksv4 +c1TBstwi0rXfRVbIZBu/5c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDrVVA+xyvX9Xvt0RK0z1rr8DR/HGzzRq5lWiV+XYOTuSQpeG/McIS6XPQ9T3BSfQGFrAMbw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a312:: with SMTP id c18mr5568775wrb.77.1582816106982; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rpluim-mac ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm8334745wmc.27.2020.02.27.07.08.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:08:26 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Pluim To: Vegard Vesterheim Subject: Re: bug#39689: 26.3; browse-url-mail not supporting RFC6068 (UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding) References: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:08:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Robert Pluim's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:51:35 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39689 Cc: 39689@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:51:35 +0100, Robert Pluim s= aid: >>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:48:54 +0100, Vegard Vesterheim via "Bug Robert> reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Robert> said: Vegard> Emacs does not seem to correctly handle UTF-8-Based Percent-Enc= oding as Vegard> illustrated in Chapter 6.2 from RFC6068. Vegard> The command=20 Vegard> emacs -Q -l browse-url -eval '(browse-url-mail "mailto:user@exa= mple.org?subject=3Dcaf%C3%A9&body=3Dcaf%C3%A9")' Vegard> should result in a message buffer with the string "caf=C3=A9" i= nsterted into the Vegard> body part of the message. Instead the string "caf=C3=83=C2=A9" = is inserted. Robert> Yes, the assumption in rfc2368-unhexify-string is that percent Robert> escaping is being done of ASCII characters. Robert> epg--decode-percent-escape-as-utf-8 in epg.el does the Robert> right thing, it could be renamed and moved. I think rfc2047 dec= oding Robert> needs doing on the result as well. Lars, should I just stick th= ese in Robert> rfc2368.el but named something like rfc6068-unhexify-string and Robert> rfc6068-decode-2047-string or something? Oh, and there=CA=BCs another version in gnus-util, and one in url, and an almost compatible one in org [1]. The gnus and url ones suffer from this same issue, although they both return different wrong results :-) At least the epg, rfc2368, gnus, and the url versions look like they can be unified. Not sure where to put them though. Footnotes: [1] It supports % representation of the UTF-8 encoding of chars, but also of the unicode code point of chars, so eg %E1 gets turned into =C3=A1. I=CA=BCm sure there=CA=BCs some historical reason for tha= t. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 14 08:25:59 2020 Received: (at 39689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2020 12:25:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jD5rb-0004sV-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:25:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jD5ra-0004sK-MC for 39689@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:25:59 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jD5rS-0001h9-GA; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:25:52 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Robert Pluim Subject: Re: bug#39689: 26.3; browse-url-mail not supporting RFC6068 (UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding) References: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:25:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Robert Pluim's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:08:25 +0100") Message-ID: <87y2s3yvg2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Robert Pluim writes: > Oh, and thereʼs another version in gnus-util, and one in url, and an > almost compatible one in org [1]. The gnus and url ones suffer from > this same issue, although they both return different wro [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39689 Cc: 39689@debbugs.gnu.org, Vegard Vesterheim X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Robert Pluim writes: > Oh, and there=CA=BCs another version in gnus-util, and one in url, and an > almost compatible one in org [1]. The gnus and url ones suffer from > this same issue, although they both return different wrong results :-) :-) > At least the epg, rfc2368, gnus, and the url versions look like they > can be unified. Not sure where to put them though. Putting them in either rfc2368 or url.el would make sense. Hm... perhaps url-util.el? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 25 07:43:46 2020 Received: (at 39689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2020 11:43:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35890 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWeR7-0007PC-WF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:43:46 -0400 Received: from mail-eopbgr40128.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.4.128]:35907 helo=EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWeR5-0007Ou-Gn for 39689@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:43:45 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kMWlHcXypFzhaM2F7ORrbvhi/iC/vIR7njy6lxjij1oe1qm6HxQj6NsIJ/7yS/ZtoXLacBccm5LMJ7gh7Y2GFBQvGF8yXILWqfP8TXu4YKXhGNWgmqSF2A8MSu+Y2lY9QLVY0IEqOPVP6TV/9P/6cSJNM1lFN0jaNKskBgAzcoSng4R+stIxRd/fIqdiX56nDTLTpPCTrlkorOC/7ThHW9tpAV2JLKm+GAKOQhJejwi7Gxlu8Kaz51xcIy+W7vRBimNpOkA3mg5O8JRYuLJIhGbyY0iIudQZwALYKArDyFkdLrcKwuIApELa5sblhF0MdDRoyR1lXEpjFPZHyPR9QQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6FmonVI0eNGiRQw6fGD+RPt1Z8VhIPa2wjhVqWAKEjc=; b=fL7ax10zOw0ng9Kxjl6ISHaJrtu3IZRAIlTZH0IJ0IYbfIcGJiLVllkdbQYnOVdw2Uw7Aqog9GaYLPH8Pacpy0VvhIHuPJctHbDI0U9TpoXzfgJzlZnERRiTdtCCbZqOfyikeT5BulK3bpB8JmlJoCi+V7/A3pgOSDuGVh8gHA7SRUCiTWqANFciLAr+9tTbHaasDhPBt0QUkalwa0FxwcE4SwYi1UDx7G24gvmWMmbp6UIZPgpgBuRp8vH2geRutVqZ28kCA/mSUJORZrS+qNGeUpjwfzUaRD1qKO2/lGrYSw2DMbSt+/rHDoqUbiDvyBpAd4wA5//PK6kMm4N32A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uninett.no; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uninett.no; dkim=pass header.d=uninett.no; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uninett.no; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6FmonVI0eNGiRQw6fGD+RPt1Z8VhIPa2wjhVqWAKEjc=; b=dtFRXP0CG3Wbfmk3k9PqLC7RSbaWsi+WJmbIEMW8xyX/wCUsDg0DY3DT757U2W4ycp5yYmVbXloClRV0YG5u3N3CxxUQAsC+wNd3NQ4rbO29XLXeTrqGeosWbay9KK9ULoTAduxtZKudX0mf2PaGL4w1JgIk9HyDcoq2siza5FQ= Authentication-Results: debbugs.gnu.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; debbugs.gnu.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=uninett.no; Received: from AM6PR08MB3813.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:85::26) by AS8PR08MB6006.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:29a::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.18; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:43:30 +0000 Received: from AM6PR08MB3813.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d0b9:3737:685f:e64d]) by AM6PR08MB3813.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d0b9:3737:685f:e64d%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.028; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:43:30 +0000 From: Vegard Vesterheim To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#39689: 26.3; browse-url-mail not supporting RFC6068 (UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding) Organization: UNINETT AS References: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> <87y2s3yvg2.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 12:41:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2s3yvg2.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:25:49 +0100") Message-ID: <875z6ysfb2.fsf@uninett.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [2001:700:1:4561::100e] X-ClientProxiedBy: OL1P279CA0033.NORP279.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:e10:13::20) To AM6PR08MB3813.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:85::26) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from llveve-15 (2001:700:1:4561::100e) by OL1P279CA0033.NORP279.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:e10:13::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.18 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:43:28 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 0d8ecc7e-21f9-4aa2-dce7-08d878db3199 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AS8PR08MB6006: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: JKBmbg46LI3kBDbnQ6ec/GURJUBjDgmAKaD3ACldV6muyNiOuUHy76N9or7pWNdGZVDTpfMPzCOGYlrVZqZ9D04Qm1qm7oatmNnbvdd6qC9IKMKGHA0EBmYLyeHZLFkOQE1Qbh3cNnBMQ8OtAZeFAypScSb9o0q8fEBwKklGWvpLSRCnvQsbbm/AyA+ICyt1tLEzJDwQO817AJ7Xfjs8HkxquN2VWQS4gi7fPO1Pp6v5bQyBxejzpmSfQfCuaAdfjOKpYC7Vq9nXt11iNtYldzX9FC9aSXs9UKxNSgaIRlKWmw7sZw5ePD/E0HQro7yctR+Mz53/fNKSzGNXNwmRnQ== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR08MB3813.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(346002)(39830400003)(376002)(366004)(186003)(6486002)(6496006)(4326008)(44832011)(6666004)(2616005)(6916009)(8676002)(16526019)(2906002)(8936002)(66946007)(52116002)(66476007)(66556008)(36916002)(478600001)(86362001)(4744005)(786003)(5660300002)(316002)(36756003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: uninett.no X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0d8ecc7e-21f9-4aa2-dce7-08d878db3199 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6PR08MB3813.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2020 11:43:30.1921 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 68763e3d-4615-4222-988f-90ba13e351e9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: lKXgqUlruhKRW7mI+xW3E35e8BatI5D8fim9woo5BI1xrPfrXFaFzkm+9h9KVlTFPHRnju2hBFEZIrhmGXz93w== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AS8PR08MB6006 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39689 Cc: 39689@debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:25:49 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote= : > Robert Pluim writes: > >> Oh, and there=CA=BCs another version in gnus-util, and one in url, and a= n >> almost compatible one in org [1]. The gnus and url ones suffer from >> this same issue, although they both return different wrong results :-) > > :-) > >> At least the epg, rfc2368, gnus, and the url versions look like they >> can be unified. Not sure where to put them though. > > Putting them in either rfc2368 or url.el would make sense. Hm... > perhaps url-util.el? I am assuming this bug is not yet fixed. Can anyone advice on a workaround I can apply for this bug. I am using emacs 26.1 (as packaged in Debian buster) --=20 Vennlig hilsen/Best regards Vegard Vesterheim Senior Software engineer +47 48 11 98 98 vegard.vesterheim@uninett.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 29 20:05:33 2021 Received: (at 39689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2021 00:05:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUnp-00065b-H2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:05:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUnk-00065J-E4 for 39689@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:05:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5FaMO6/NWmf9qZ3ekWAt+TrsAAtjgbBTUin8osCe+fU=; b=CfGDAAAclhH+Wd04J95NWH0Gu9 WPu7AkdN2GcZwlqTZK6sIo2Z8FC1qWhSRcAxdsovsFONvhRHSOEWUFUxnshPEbGRaPcmmK5+cZad9 fqjlV11AqmfXk40Ei6Stp1DR2bmf/Uhh/9h76Kt7WZK7M3uzZCFYygVAlQCLFJtUwA/k=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUnY-0005nX-Qs; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:05:17 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Robert Pluim Subject: Re: bug#39689: 26.3; browse-url-mail not supporting RFC6068 (UTF-8-Based Percent-Encoding) References: <1sd0a9tlmh.fsf@uninett.no> <87y2s3yvg2.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:05:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2s3yvg2.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:25:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87y28jajbb.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> At least the epg, rfc2368, gnus, and the url versions look like they >> can be unified. Not sure where to put them though. > > Putting them in either rfc2368 or url.el would make sense. Hm... > per [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39689 Cc: 39689@debbugs.gnu.org, Vegard Vesterheim X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> At least the epg, rfc2368, gnus, and the url versions look like they >> can be unified. Not sure where to put them though. > > Putting them in either rfc2368 or url.el would make sense. Hm... > perhaps url-util.el? I made a new file, obsoleted rfc2368, and adjusted browse-url and epg. So the original reported problem should now be fixed in Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 29 20:05:38 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2021 00:05:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUnu-00065u-R9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:05:38 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUnp-00065R-Lc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:05:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vk00+qsjbCGzmekkyGeD7Hf+/bFDwmByEREyWB3rTsQ=; b=P6w+CGNC5HDNqlzxGeMfEb+6Vz xBmmmL6iewVO3zE8pMqnD5eTPqfmlXm8fu5DDLfVTMqTYlayJkvbwHYEHj75eV92xLF6gN1F9gZZ3 6jh5UXENzKSxsxlmOyOEXWZ7SHki6zhBANU0vGP6mWfXtnMJbo3aMzQtc9gPThkWILIs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUnh-0005ni-Qs for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:05:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:05:21 +0200 Message-Id: <87wno3ajb2.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #39689 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 39689 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 39689 28.1 quit From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:55:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator