GNU bug report logs - #39655
[PATCH core-updates] doc: Add 'Scheme-only Bootstrap' node.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: Timothy Sample <samplet <at> ngyro.com>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>, 39655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#39655] [PATCH core-updates] doc: Add 'Scheme-only Bootstrap' node.
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 09:37:45 +0200

Efraim Flashner writes:

> I have to ask since we're talking about bootstrapability; is it actually
> not bootstrappable or is it just harder/more complex? (The question is
> more about the wording than about the logistics of it.)

gzip is about 7000 LOC of simple C, can be compiled with tinycc (and
probably mescc), and we have gzip in Gash.  That Scheme code is not
trivial but with not too much work we can have Mes run that code.  It's
also conceivable to have an M2-Planet port of gzip.

xz is about 25,000 LOC of C and I only managed to build it after having
a full fledged gcc-4.6, gcc-2.95 or tinycc did not work for me.

So, if SED only ships xz-compressed tarballs, that makes
creating/maintaining the GNU bootstrap story more difficult.

Greetings,
Janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.