GNU bug report logs - #39601
srfi library naming in r7rs

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#39601: closed (Re: bug#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs)
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:54:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 39601 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
39601: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39601
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: lloda <lloda <at> sarc.name>
To: Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 39601-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, pclouds <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:53:10 +0100

Applied in a960d7869bc82bb56d5446ece01b8efff9b15fef. Thank you!

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: srfi library naming in r7rs
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:48:20 +0700

I'm running Guile 3.0.0 and very new to Guile. Forgive me if this is
not the right place to report (or whether I should do more search,
where?, before reporting)

It seems like in r7rs mode, srfi libraries are still named in "Guile
style", (srfi srfi-1). I can't find a place in r7rs-small to spell out
"srfi followed by a number". But it seems every other r7rs scheme goes
with (srfi 1) instead. Should Guile support this naming convention as
well? It certainly makes it easier to reuse external libraries.
-- 
Duy

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.