Subject: Re: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

From: zimoun <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:43:46 +0100

Hi,

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our
> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument
> since one can easily change the substitute URLs.)

I am not following the privacy concern.
What do you mean?

Cheers,
simon