GNU bug report logs -
#3953
23.0.94; GPG interaction fails
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hallöchen!
Daiki Ueno writes:
> [...]
>
>>> Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with:
>>>
>>> (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "")
>>>
>>> change the situation?
>
>> It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only
>> slightly.
>
> Hmm, is your epg-debug output as innocent as the one that the original
> reporter provided?
It's every time:
gpg --no-tty --status-fd 1 --yes --command-fd 0 --output /tmp/epg-output6267bsQ -
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 74 0
gpg: Signatur am Mo 29 Jun 2009 10:31:28 CEST mit DSA Schlüssel, ID 9F516B77, erfolgt
[GNUPG:] SIG_ID jkbjBUZ5Lu5ozCYNw6Tsx9qYwsY 2009-06-29 1246264288
[GNUPG:] GOODSIG D5E3CEFC9F516B77 Torsten Bronger <bronger <at> physik.rwth-aachen.de>
gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von 'Torsten Bronger <bronger <at> physik.rwth-aachen.de>'
[GNUPG:] VALIDSIG C5C8D6E279D2EFE98C0F6D77D5E3CEFC9F516B77 2009-06-29 1246264288 0 3 0 17 2 01 C5C8D6E279D2EFE98C0F6D77D5E3CEFC9F516B77
[GNUPG:] TRUST_ULTIMATE
> Currently, I suspect that the code in the following clause might be
> skipped:
>
> (unless epg-process-filter-running ...)
>
> Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It would be
> something like:
>
> (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running)
And where should I put it exactly? (I don't speak Lisp.) I now
wrote
(unless epg-process-filter-running
(message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running)
And then, *Messages* say
epg-process-filter-running: nil
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: torsten.bronger <at> jabber.rwth-aachen.de
or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com
This bug report was last modified 15 years and 198 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.