From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 07 19:31:45 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2020 00:31:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0E2C-0007Bv-Rv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:31:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60007) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0E29-0007Bl-1q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:31:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j0E27-0005L4-SQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:31:40 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j0E26-0001al-Sr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:31:39 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:46443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j0E26-0001Xj-NZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:31:38 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF153AB; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:31:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:31:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=mEQTCrb2VybgZGJYS7rC+hNq7NVhX1XT0qXvlegKLNk=; b=uO8O0 IhJEJVlr6WH0HhpnFCgyMvxlLww7i5O/k0JGWGtjyKBdx8qtmJvWmFMEnMVrIYPk uCeqkua7ZqIkidR/0h4Glsh3mjoppYIe30sZYgcg4MzKnNUqrkfSWX7NOM3lePbh SS1LegSwN/8x/7XD+KlTeDVC/QdoflzR3J2HpQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=mEQTCrb2VybgZGJYS7rC+hNq7NVhX 1XT0qXvlegKLNk=; b=mw6OH9xqrFOVSxivtnJozXBOOwlQNgSUui5ZsWMPla6Dv vM2V2Ubsp+wXkeRbaeRXD6qv1iPVM0jR27ybrnWNmtEDoHRadNh+tnYJJlHg2eCH 8zp4+EBTUJDHU2IQZAjpAHUrcxiPZuq8PBD/Ki2dFBLv4QeRaArPsU72Alk+bGr5 2EN3kp412qkf78Hpr4UqhXkzELvz7c3AxApIcI6mwK/kCDP4QC1QypInPxcksJjr GOWiLp5R+vttVAlimEs0d/a0FOIYfKqDoTrvGheybC43hInfCG/rGReaDLo8gmda vLojkYBFfp6CYA9FBDEkM/tNBsONmvRu1JsNpu5/A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrheeigddvgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehttdertddttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdr nhgrmhgvqeenucffohhmrghinhepghhuihigrdhinhhfohenucfkphepudejvddrheekrd dvtdefrdduieeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.203.168]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F3C7C30607B0 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:31:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:31:22 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems Message-ID: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.123.24 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) As discussed in #39332 [0], it would be great if filesystem utility packages were added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses that filesystem type. For example, btrfs-progs could be added if a btrfs filesystem was listed in file-systems. [0] https://issues.guix.info/issue/39332#3 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 10 17:07:07 2020 Received: (at 39505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2020 22:07:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55650 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1HCt-0005Xk-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:07:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1HCr-0005Wp-3w for 39505@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:07:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1HCl-0007qF-Td; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:07:00 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:6a6c:dc17:fc02:cfda] (port=45638 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j1HCk-0001Q8-NU; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:06:59 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#39505: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems References: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:06:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:31:22 -0500") Message-ID: <87r1z2gkqo.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39505 Cc: 39505@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Leo, Leo Famulari skribis: > As discussed in #39332 [0], it would be great if filesystem utility > packages were added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses > that filesystem type. > > For example, btrfs-progs could be added if a btrfs filesystem was listed > in file-systems. This could be done with something like: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/gnu/system.scm b/gnu/system.scm index 01baa248a2..3ff3073017 100644 --- a/gnu/system.scm +++ b/gnu/system.scm @@ -203,7 +203,11 @@ (default %default-issue)) (packages operating-system-packages ; list of (PACKAGE OUTPUT...) - (default %base-packages)) ; or just PACKAGE + (thunked) ; or just PACKAGE + (default (append (file-system-packages + (operating-system-file-systems + this-operating-system)) + %base-packages))) (timezone operating-system-timezone) ; string (locale operating-system-locale ; string --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable However, this would only work for the default values of =E2=80=98packages= =E2=80=99. In other cases, users would have to add (file-system-packages =E2=80=A6) expli= citly by themselves, which is not great. Alternately, we could turn =E2=80=98%base-packages=E2=80=99 into a macro th= at expands to something like: (gimme-the-base-packages this-operating-system) but that wouldn=E2=80=99t be great because now you=E2=80=99d be unable to r= efer to =E2=80=98%base-packages=E2=80=99 like a regular variable, outside the lexic= al context of an =E2=80=98operating-system=E2=80=99 form. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 22:31:16 2020 Received: (at 39505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2020 03:31:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4cYW-0002Ur-41 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:31:16 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com ([209.85.222.179]:34799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4cYU-0002Ue-MM for 39505@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:31:15 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id c20so2344382qkm.1 for <39505@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:31:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=T6fO+559TsgfvYJgpQbAQ50/uCM0IAb6xdBextSechs=; b=Zl6v1KOZnpFP0OsxmZXWMcwSeuOzCOzJf4Ez7VUv4F/xnLTiHALBj9cOf52TWwacA1 CVGqwQ0B9LGgObbPcLgPoI6GbroMj3yRITaKT4IfhWmOrE6R2g9GP2sEmWe6SCaqx8Ba QQm3oc1UgJNO7SvHSh+W0crFxdquZwph5uXbZrtkheT4g9j7fE5hXqt5z1p4atA1pXn6 JWBzS3OouIkASkA8omhA+mmFX6xU76I+06nql7QRSldgXreD3IfWgLV7lmkTb1vGRw0l zzD3onnpsJc3eeoo7K1hr2PhhnyQBs7IPZrPB61aIdo//4bNdveEo9g2aLl9uch50F3E RM+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=T6fO+559TsgfvYJgpQbAQ50/uCM0IAb6xdBextSechs=; b=amHYK2gEunjb/FjMaW0a1anfRIB/iKNo0ID2iwv4e3CWce/UWfVaLFM/B24joYPMOx x6CPgEaN7hZ9ULkJM76uJBpEQP+c5t/+nJM2mbuVauY0kpdljTMeCzV7E21syYI+0clB REteo9IidsZk4pQsNqUmSOWjHZZNfZY/U2W5MUxkak5ziGCLjYsKeoFZ9hddSQEWITC/ ThcxeU+U753rCgJCuNA/dp00X/9pZpK6tm4KVPs8A33eVLyf71PR6UjrVuG/y+VgHCmQ TurphkXNWTxKp1e5xA+UXzHY6ZeJUNTN5GLV/oSHM+j8dyxAeUZzRKPVkHzVoqi+lKaU 1wWw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVsI3dYHKgHtbJsMTDHoIbcoCVoOlHlmDIZcCNtWBge6ng1XfM1 N1SGcEJe33w8UceGCVlWakTssv+L X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFJj2h2voplmw38WUe95zYe9oV8if6+6Af5uA1eoXd93M9WDsP1fNg25KONgz+oZcRH+XlVw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:2744:: with SMTP id n65mr26092982qkn.92.1582169468916; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from apteryx (dsl-151-135.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.151.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v55sm1230486qtc.1.2020.02.19.19.31.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:31:08 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer X-Google-Original-From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#39505: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems References: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:31:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:31:22 -0500") Message-ID: <87blpu2av8.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39505 Cc: 39505@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Leo, Leo Famulari writes: > As discussed in #39332 [0], it would be great if filesystem utility > packages were added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses > that filesystem type. > > For example, btrfs-progs could be added if a btrfs filesystem was listed > in file-systems. > > [0] > https://issues.guix.info/issue/39332#3 What is the use case? Just having btrfs utilities to manage Btrfs file systems, or is there some problems to avoid? I know that for NFS you must add nfs-utils so that the util-linux provided 'mount' is able to mount NFS shares. If the later is the use case, perhaps we could try to hard reference to each file system utility in util-linux, instead of having it dispatch some tool supposed to be in the PATH? I'm not sure how difficult that would be, and it'd for sure increase the size of util-linux, but perhaps the pros outweighs the cons. Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 20 13:37:36 2020 Received: (at 39505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2020 18:37:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45843 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4qhc-0001BY-8C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:36 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:40505) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4qhZ-0001BK-UZ for 39505@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:35 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7F2427; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=zXbpOo1DB0vzp6UogdkGGK1h WbtAuWROHjcJQ1yaXmw=; b=bSEawjoSiAo43jd5CS5AqV+s8mHyi+WUmbOhLVDk 9uXq9HUmKXDKAT/1OfYFRy0bFl92J0eXL40ds0cehXlFEgge23i1D8me9mUzYLKd CGqRmtesKXhagLAmuWGMZr+MoTQWKLDg6Yd4aDkctwwlpZI4E+UP1u5KkhbNHeb3 qAw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zXbpOo 1DB0vzp6UogdkGGK1hWbtAuWROHjcJQ1yaXmw=; b=Bg0h199A7kj1bnST3zxPJv e1zagl87nv6M1Qa/Kb8y80/FHyi5n7pJ4fI1Is+XOI8PBWz9esJci+jtqbojYv7j hZ17JibYwaGItp2NlPThWMJhNprslUXnLK5JDLddV0aclU8tSVahiDQwbZ+FN+ZZ G24IwsR/WsVs0nktYtRQ6EkU7MpACtNEypbUwoJdNMHxcie2MU0b9nzndOf1x03k YXfGezW460GlM+nFStBc8Ei+8TcX6lONJaQat9XxA9olxwyiC0Nr8jcF+lvJsD0x 1vFTzMhhKmOshtRQZizTtA2ds560T6mXWjSik3eNZaQmcF/HBHomPTbmruL0Cz9A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrkedvgdduudejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucfkphepjeeird duvdegrddufeekrdeifeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgr ihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5D3863060F09; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:26 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#39505: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems Message-ID: <20200220183726.GA6891@jasmine.lan> References: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> <87blpu2av8.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87blpu2av8.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39505 Cc: 39505@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:31:07PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > What is the use case? Just having btrfs utilities to manage Btrfs file > systems, or is there some problems to avoid? I know that for NFS you > must add nfs-utils so that the util-linux provided 'mount' is able to > mount NFS shares. It's just to manage the filesystems. For example, the equivalent of `df -h` requires btrfs-progs. > If the later is the use case, perhaps we could try to hard reference to > each file system utility in util-linux, instead of having it dispatch > some tool supposed to be in the PATH? I'm not sure how difficult that > would be, and it'd for sure increase the size of util-linux, but perhaps > the pros outweighs the cons. Is there some integration between util-linux and btrfs-progs? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 20 15:32:17 2020 Received: (at 39505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2020 20:32:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4sUb-00044J-9T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:32:17 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f195.google.com ([209.85.222.195]:45221) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4sUY-000444-N5 for 39505@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:32:15 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id a2so4841094qko.12 for <39505@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:32:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lbhKLnFRRuLqolFS4G+VMLdP3e+x8X/TRsHp1fresh8=; b=laPKqnT+j85hs3a8iIznTGlQvEBrPr4FbLN1Swq6YdRpYcW4qx71CZYIFoRmFsDHkI OkFoBtZG7DHXox/daMJrkfM9velBoc2isqZXPwOdtF9bNR0wcaZOz0oyO//EGhh0uehI wG9hATZeOJ8iJqwpqTxTQq2lEtHjGiUUsA8Dnpimtpw7mkaJj9MSnJiZJxKFANoDfEKr gwIzouLDwlRUIm9eneHnrrX3epfPYFlVe7luDIwZeHQ34bgoAkLUC2mmCZ4Krg9u7bCu 0Rozs9biIG/MZSsPJrr6b/BMV26M4u9dTiAdgsP7x+DpmN0qX2P2Tiph1nJjBTJRwAsl VIOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lbhKLnFRRuLqolFS4G+VMLdP3e+x8X/TRsHp1fresh8=; b=aJyF4QH79tHdznRLkaPqOp5VfBd6PNNxNJG4T+wlyfNcc8nEjoNgtLx18Anym/eqq2 hnKjItuLat/zYqtHoY9UwEPZdyIvVWDUgnwsaKMgoYZuXvi1jS/cF7oG2IfudmGt7VlB e/Zd0sAu6NPuTtT82P1V7+V+tIFV/k6dM9l3gavceUVv5tSr9bABPYsEQ7SSEa0NqGeE 15zOK5TZzyV5TAuv6dvqauIbqagynnY4ZQbNtQfMp3+lq1RGdrI549Y/3ktOPNd07dLP Cn9K+xKuKpnNuZ6kiJplXFWApT189UQTHlhh7tzuxtUQ75PBKJVgyDF9R50IR3iWbIHo okjw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXO6DWq66f2syA2N3tXeeF5/eE8rKJ6W6WPp+ho966Bf1sxLU9H mPCUCVQz2F8of18hy1gGJ9adWge+eTM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlzswUXGmcg93yeB/CuiP5/a0Rc4w712KGz5mNl9FXwnOh4yODxj9sR7PWFzJUDZnJWT0GEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:625:: with SMTP id 5mr9920391qkv.150.1582230729001; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:32:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from raisin ([2607:fad8:4:6:235e:8579:8464:aacc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g84sm358011qke.129.2020.02.20.12.32.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:32:08 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#39505: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems References: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> <87blpu2av8.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200220183726.GA6891@jasmine.lan> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:32:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200220183726.GA6891@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:26 -0500") Message-ID: <87k14hxanr.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39505 Cc: 39505@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:31:07PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> What is the use case? Just having btrfs utilities to manage Btrfs file >> systems, or is there some problems to avoid? I know that for NFS you >> must add nfs-utils so that the util-linux provided 'mount' is able to >> mount NFS shares. > > It's just to manage the filesystems. For example, the equivalent of `df > -h` requires btrfs-progs. OK; so just as a convenience. >> If the later is the use case, perhaps we could try to hard reference to >> each file system utility in util-linux, instead of having it dispatch >> some tool supposed to be in the PATH? I'm not sure how difficult that >> would be, and it'd for sure increase the size of util-linux, but perhaps >> the pros outweighs the cons. > > Is there some integration between util-linux and btrfs-progs? No, at least mounting Btrfs doesn't require a mount.btrfs helper like NFS does. Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 28 19:54:09 2022 Received: (at 39505-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2022 23:54:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odgsT-0006rY-Br for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:54:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f179.google.com ([209.85.160.179]:41490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odgsQ-0006r7-LB for 39505-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:54:07 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f179.google.com with SMTP id c11so8953958qtw.8 for <39505-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=eDmjOg1o3/q20A5fyQO8HN4WgvqEtTR3w356kbmQmlE=; b=aM17Q5cxKGooX9oi5/Mu/F88PzMemESfbWfcrk1yBJdD+Yx5CH7x/uvrBXL8/ojpN+ yUWwVtD0+UP6M4B1kmbaLYDmjBThHjMMzdT5GbcgtYwfM+umlmLPgTo3EQWOBs+7aq+8 LxIFOsnwu2mBWuRIYfb0uoe0psxUqe3Idb8UPD6FS6wr/jYuXBJGyjG3UXYR6Lbd5HDb JXpNVe3/62Drx0ibOnUbkOjgtgoDpCipeF3LHhMWFnT1+D/IV5j3klVDZRWODEgDasQp x9UM7kSr/RUQSXaazibuPn38is6r15PQ5kSWWqyBiPI9ZFZKZiq0vbCXGqhNze1nw4oN xy5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=eDmjOg1o3/q20A5fyQO8HN4WgvqEtTR3w356kbmQmlE=; b=TRpvAxidzHNPkBk0PjDeGNO1u+Wv7KaRVUTaEgrljXuVZSWJ/DIjH6CwBaNTCaA1kQ 5xNqgCfRKCWkDsacqQRLrDyoyTIf0B7UfV8Up2eJr0gg6oyDizIHSIh25Yqyxh7r+1p/ F3RIKe0/pdoqMJHohvfASa4l6kcMTjCjVhccpbzWlSD+5b1nhn/ec9pL5BN+WwIUL3bK jft1CCHbpomD5+ArEOkgn9p98x/1L09n9d6BR5KnUbrODY94WVlHrHMBFDWlsvPJIDmy xhlTcCA2YPNzvync284csklMY8Lq4oG1sURuA9Kbqsb0YVwUmpc6AiC83BHHVprE1YLj 51qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3aMDraHF+j/80owVbltRgtdEKzIIRMwrcczo13hW+2gZ1mV24T vuV6ALA+HzjNmZC5OI92BcI+vXPHt/yrAg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6YDo3NXdtJCYea+IUScH+TAa7jGlr+nSDT5Y+nZKzYLbJ+z4fChSMNqaX+FjRhuUk+fwD2Iw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:18a3:b0:35b:af14:401e with SMTP id v35-20020a05622a18a300b0035baf14401emr295021qtc.200.1664409240963; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-148-95.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.148.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s196-20020a37a9cd000000b006a65c58db99sm4202828qke.64.2022.09.28.16.54.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#39505: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems References: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan> <87blpu2av8.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200220183726.GA6891@jasmine.lan> <87k14hxanr.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:53:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k14hxanr.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:32:08 -0500") Message-ID: <87sfkbqcmg.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39505-done Cc: 39505-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:31:07PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>> What is the use case? Just having btrfs utilities to manage Btrfs file >>> systems, or is there some problems to avoid? I know that for NFS you >>> must add nfs-utils so that the util-linux provided 'mount' is able to >>> mount NFS shares. >> >> It's just to manage the filesystems. For example, the equivalent of `df >> -h` requires btrfs-progs. [...] I pushed the change made by Brice addressing this as 45eac6cdf5c8d9d7b0c564b105c790d2d2007799. Closing, thanks! Maxim From unknown Sun Jul 27 06:47:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator