From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 13:37:44 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2020 18:37:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izm24-0000yJ-I1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:37:44 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50469) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izm22-0000yA-Cf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:37:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izm20-0007RN-UT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:37:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izm1z-00046J-72 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:37:40 -0500 Received: from sonic311-31.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([77.238.176.163]:37238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izm1y-0003sw-Gx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:37:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s2048; t=1581014256; bh=1EwddHZwoD1JbkKEws9P1pkrKMJhtZDR3N6V6701rbU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:From:Subject; b=NmYLtzUNjBqP4qSipmzm0qGiH1e5hSJUq0kGLtdszG3hxg0VxCV/lSoWLPwzxQIt5N7EXpap24o0BG3/cCMCJGkKX0eiFvvOppEy9i2EoWewT/PP2cOZag4H3qcdcNZWAAVdrqX7hp5vfxj8gtm55n0euQs8dzPNqitaFa7xqRHOkORyywewcmZ3awcWiSodttZWWxXSmPEZWr5RoBSL8WktP8+hwpRm1fKAHsIZAhoeGJe988tdlrFTTRbg0qkWQBIpoD2GREZek6IzHn3hxZiq3sbKCHOSvKY5GMGXCf3GOnCPMVJwBNkrAQBbjd97gEg09w0DQz3EOCRDh7F0dA== X-YMail-OSG: P_cBqpAVM1kpoLSx5xO_au2wLOciX3rBbQWtN2qQOuzfqutj2f6WxtLw.ULSziT ILEB6hoQTOgzAQ9h5TQxFIMyiBx3qxstmwoR3iRMeThc3Up2sW8Iabd4iKNJKmLAFqS79CyNdtw3 0ldsFy0Exz5QOGk.eROH95S9GmI4N1y0JUe9_rviGlGShRznTFuJecfGAyoweNA.zVOBViFX8yQ6 HSBtoIcAwTftP3NMO6_gPUKYBUkBcLTnq0V7JWTtCVBhJ2EWfeckVMYLVYJg9kG3hEu3Sg9E9UyT izAN29xCbg5PJtHdMQHnT0k50gy8vKZih1hwwf2K7Q1y1NmQn9JbqEGsMDkFMoTVsf2WkMSw27is eyP_cdrO3fwD2OeUxsAQM1Qdy_99qGU9y_fbFOyzJ1EIFgEnVQppQnxG_R_tKUJZY6UjtJgJ_v6s jNsxR4Z1dVPTORY1jlk8TOKBeVX8nfPlrdza4r0gk8uyrXCZevBEMFNePg.vzjKczCbnAnB4r7fH CU.XNmO1tia9w7Xfbqf20FGbyvHjMsdGjdrBkcqJAfmOgcSymdPt18NWmJgp48s27Oi0okVMnzpE VufE_71JHtYZaOgRsbQkk6nl_T.6Zc42rLjH5JchIcIOfcAnkebNm3YuS.lc4yQsfE21t0975OUz 0BkzwCgSOjUnvDHy9wezKwPTcI1Wl1Se3etcip17ls5jTQFWEfriO47p3G2cVCH4sAnJbpgPeRDR Xjtgin_ZAIqHrek1mEXFKGCB1rRl1L87rQCpDkiSs0k.h1rXazNvoZTQ18W.vHjt7GcAHwu_SAeX JRpgs4n3B816sk1E.ukGV6vYE5IXQbubYCykKKx5pEmCsiD0R7mfGabMW9TdK7P4qAxGaTNBOQ0e ouZ5NPCOeTuGKBiLNY8.CBXIcu5K4mwemvRdjcAv_j9hEDs62O4jstzCwkRFwjPwGSKkqoibwXfh Jxkrr8b5guk.Q6aKbEGhVYAJ2MAhWHbknk2gCP01orIWvymZGFbSrrGAHiS1LvjQpwzJ9874e.Sf An5oOuZ.VrfwSbWhJpzCg.LVddnU7TIIrEZpZhlbWoY4L3KKcSHvPZkz6Ls210jgUZd0RjIzkzOX DT55t.TemjJSaPHKijxfcYz7Tx7KkXWYjgnCkl.1H4YMYFecPUNE52yUViq9.LRuAgMnsKtv3VvQ fu2fschEiq1sRWgebfFSX1rbvVpUvJ6s5rLxd5YmERMozINP3TC2S.1S8h0U4wYBWF_cN8k3AN9h pxe56PTX0b7w.BIvi1FYvXjZ42v5dytUaPDsgiZ1.T0qziXMadXctbnOF2.pMCXmavgZCjq8S8tR RQ7bgtBMw2BvJBv3hjwFAYeRPIVwU0RAFnETaAyZxdjjvX3DViDZMSsbViSEpt60tyg6XcEzpusL wEnegs.qaLkP2Qmsj Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:37:36 +0000 Received: by smtp431.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 5c91d11751ae095dbafd697b268c7455; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:37:34 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Tim Gesthuizen To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: Fix baud-rate option in inputattach-service Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:37:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1z7o93n.fsf@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" References: <87r1z7o93n.fsf.ref@yahoo.de> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15185 hermes Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/1.8.0_181) Content-Length: 1624 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 77.238.176.163 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Raghav Gururajan X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi, the "baud-rate" option for inputattach-service is broken, the inputattach program expects the option to be named just "--baud". The attached patch fixes the issue. Just out of interest: Should we stick in Guix to the option used by the program or stick with the old name? I would like to keep the "baud-rate" name as it is the thing the parameter configures: The baud-rate for the connection. Tim. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-services-inputattach-Fix-broken-baud-rate-option.patch >From 223608191ba3587b1e9f1e1257d482dc89c59709 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Gesthuizen Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 19:26:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] services: inputattach: Fix broken baud rate option * gnu/services/desktop.scm (inputattach-shepherd-service): Use "--baud" for setting the baud-rate. --- gnu/services/desktop.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/services/desktop.scm b/gnu/services/desktop.scm index 9dcdf38be1..1294d748ac 100644 --- a/gnu/services/desktop.scm +++ b/gnu/services/desktop.scm @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ as expected."))) (match-lambda (($ type device baud-rate log-file) (let ((args (append (if baud-rate - (list "--baud-rate" (number->string baud-rate)) + (list "--baud" (number->string baud-rate)) '()) (list (string-append "--" type) device)))) -- 2.25.0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 22:54:59 2020 Received: (at 39457-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2020 03:54:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izujL-0001Hr-A6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:54:59 -0500 Received: from rezeros.cc ([45.76.207.221]:60568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izujI-0001He-QK for 39457-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:54:57 -0500 Received: from localhost ( [117.173.227.196]) by rezeros.cc (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bd02ad4f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 03:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gift (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fa0e2d58; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 03:54:15 +0000 (UTC) From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) To: Tim Gesthuizen Subject: Re: [bug#39457] Fix baud-rate option in inputattach-service References: <87r1z7o93n.fsf.ref@yahoo.de> <87r1z7o93n.fsf@yahoo.de> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:54:15 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87r1z7o93n.fsf@yahoo.de> (Tim Gesthuizen's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:37:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87wo8z59y0.fsf@member.fsf.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39457-done Cc: Raghav Gururajan , 39457-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Tim Gesthuizen writes: > Hi, > > the "baud-rate" option for inputattach-service is broken, the > inputattach program expects the option to be named just "--baud". > The attached patch fixes the issue. Pushed, thank you! > > Just out of interest: Should we stick in Guix to the option used by the > program or stick with the old name? > I would like to keep the "baud-rate" name as it is the thing the > parameter configures: The baud-rate for the connection. > I think both are fine, as we document it in our info manual. :) From unknown Wed Jul 30 13:09:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator