GNU bug report logs - #3941
23.0.96; doc for distinguishing interactive calls

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:50:04 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: notabug

Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 3941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 3941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.96; doc for distinguishing interactive calls
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:15:35 +0200
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> This bug report is about node (elisp)Distinguish Interactive.
> Starting with Emacs 22, you introduced `called-interactively-p'.  As a
> result, the doc explaining testing for interactive use became worse,
> not better.
>
> The "recommended" way is presented first.  Why it is recommended is
> not stated, and it's not clear to me (recommended for what use cases?
> why?).  The "recommended" way does not really test whether a function
> was in fact called interactively.

Separating out the interactive parts into the `interactive' spec is just
good style, instead of sprinkling the code further down for
interactiveness.

I've read the node in question now, and I think it's quite clear, and
doesn't say anything I disagree with much, so I'm closing this bug
report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 321 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.