GNU bug report logs - #39387
Builds are *not* offloaded when using the "--keep-failed" or -K option.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 04:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #15 received at 39387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 39387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#39387: Builds are *not* offloaded when using the
 "--keep-failed" or -K option.
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 23:55:19 -0500
Hello!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> In the second case, the build is started on the local machine instead of
>> being dispatched to the offload machine.  Presumably, this is done so
>> that the files are available locally; but I'd prefer if it'd offload and
>> keep the files on the remote.  An alternative would be to copy the remote build directory
>> locally after failure.
>
> Indeed, it’s a feature!  :-)  It was discussed here:
>
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/38312
>
> There we discussed the possibility of printing a warning, which wasn’t
> implemented.

I see!

> I’m closing in the meantime, but let me know what you think!

OK!  I think I now see the technical difficulties in implementing a
useful, offloaded interrupted build: the build artifacts, even if copied
locally, would require syncing all the build time dependencies in order
to allow sourcing the "environment-variables" script and be able to
debug.  That's more the job of 'guix publish', not of 'guix offload'.

Maxim




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 164 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.