GNU bug report logs - #39361
continuation and gc performance

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 39361 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39361: continuation and gc performance
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:43:49 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

That function marks the working stack no, what about stack segments in
continuations will they be marked correctly as well?

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:33 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
>
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > I think I found a gc leak in guile 3.0
> >
> > Isn't it so that so the continuation keep a copy of the stack. The issue
> is
> > that in the stack a raw integer or float may be present and so the gc
> > properties is less then ideal as those may be interpreted as pointers by
> > the GC and lead to parts of the heap being kept from garnage collecting.
> >
> > The information about a slot being a raw value or a scm value is
> > available as we do the correct gc updating of the stack inside guile 3.0.
> > May I propose that we add a bitvector to the continuation that indicate
> > that if a lslot is raw or not. Then add a pass that collect the rawness
> > information in the creation of the closure. Finally a custom made mark
> > procedure for closures can be made that uses all this information to make
> > sure to mark only scm slots in the stored continuation therby improving
> gc
> > perfromance.
>
> I believe what you describe is already what happens in
> ‘scm_i_vm_mark_stack’.  Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.