GNU bug report logs - #39340
26.3; "Noto Emoji" font not displayed

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: ynyaaa <at> gmail.com

Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:13:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 26.3

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #44 received at 39340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 39340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ynyaaa <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#39340: 26.3; "Noto Emoji" font not displayed
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 18:58:16 +0200
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: YAGI Tatsuya <ynyaaa <at> gmail.com>,  39340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:27:23 +0100
> 
>     >> (current\ fallback:\ font\ for 66720 nil)
> 
>     Eli> I don't understand why it falls back to "current fallback"; it doesn't
>     Eli> on my system.
> 
>     Eli> I guess we've reached the limit of what I know about how Emacs looks
>     Eli> for fonts (which admittedly isn't too much).
> 
> Iʼve just given this a quick go on my Windows-10 VM: Ebrima is
> correctly used for OSMANYA DIGITS when using the harfbuzz backend, but
> not when using the uniscribe backend.

Interesting.  What happens when Uniscribe is used? do you also see
Emacs falling back on "current fallback"?  And if so, can you see why
that happens?  Does font_has_char return zero or -1 for Ebrima and any
of the OSMANYA DIGITs?

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 247 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.