GNU bug report logs - #39311
[PATCH] gnu: Add guix-vim.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:22:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #13 received at 39311-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 39311-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39311] [PATCH] gnu: Add guix-vim.
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:43:17 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:28:20PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> 
> Hi Efraim,
> 
> > * gnu/packages/vim.scm (guix-vim): New variable.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/vim.scm | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/vim.scm b/gnu/packages/vim.scm
> > index b5952e3e21..a2d715dc1c 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/vim.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/vim.scm
> > @@ -938,3 +938,45 @@ through its msgpack-rpc API.")
> >  
> >  (define-public python2-pynvim
> >    (package-with-python2 python-pynvim))
> > +
> > +(define-public guix-vim
> 
> Looks like we usually prefix vim extensions with “vim-”, so should this
> be “vim-guix” instead…?

Good call

> 
> > +         (replace 'install
> > +           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> > +             (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> > +                    (vimfiles (string-append out "/share/vim/vimfiles"))
> > +                    (compiler (string-append vimfiles "/compiler"))
> > +                    (doc      (string-append vimfiles "/doc"))
> > +                    (indent   (string-append vimfiles "/indent"))
> > +                    (ftdetect (string-append vimfiles "/ftdetect"))
> > +                    (ftplugin (string-append vimfiles "/ftplugin"))
> > +                    (syntax   (string-append vimfiles "/syntax")))
> > +               (copy-recursively "compiler" compiler)
> > +               (copy-recursively "doc" doc)
> > +               (copy-recursively "indent" indent)
> > +               (copy-recursively "ftdetect" ftdetect)
> > +               (copy-recursively "ftplugin" ftplugin)
> > +               (copy-recursively "syntax" syntax)
> > +               #t))))))
> 
> The repetition here tickles me a little.  How about this instead…?
> 
> (for-each (lambda (dir)
>            (copy-recursively dir (string-append vimfiles "/" dir)))
>           '("compiler" "doc" "indent" "ftdetect" "ftplugin" "syntax"))

This will also be good if we ever get around to making a
vim-build-system.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 115 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.