GNU bug report logs -
#39301
Guile warnings printed upon reconfigure due to 3.0/2.2 mismatch
Previous Next
Full log
Message #15 received at 39301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 2., Vas
22:15):
> Hello!
>
> strypsteen <at> posteo.net skribis:
>
> > Whenever running "sudo guix system reconfigure /path/to/config.scm I
> > get the following warnings:
> >
> > building
> > /gnu/store/vpazjd711byj3jszh7jrk5d8lq51077g-switch-to-system.scm.drv...
> > ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
> >
> /gnu/store/5bd6ywmfcxxa4gvpzg0pdbjwmf24cxkl-module-import-compiled/gnu/build/activation.go
> > failed:
> > ;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode kind
> > ;;; compiling
>
> [...]
>
> > building
> > /gnu/store/alamdi63ns0ahis93jz1x4cndy4w09gf-install-bootloader.scm.drv...
> > WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides
> > core binding `delete'
> > ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
> >
> /gnu/store/62gvwndkddaq6203mrisshgiv13kkgcd-module-import-compiled/gnu/build/bootloader.go
> > failed:
> > ;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode kind
> > ;;; compiling
> >
> /gnu/store/wamhgn5mhgzf9mgp9gxx3w6jn64hw4yc-module-import/gnu/build/bootloader.scm
> > ;;; compiled
> >
> /root/.cache/guile/ccache/3.0-LE-8-4.2/gnu/store/wamhgn5mhgzf9mgp9gxx3w6jn64hw4yc-module-import/gnu/build/bootloader.scm.go
> > guix system: bootloader successfully installed on '/boot/efi'
> > WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides
> > core binding `delete'
>
> All these warnings are harmless and stem from the Guile 2.2/3.0
> transition. Specifically, it comes from the fact that ‘guix system
> reconfigure’ evaluates this code with the host Guile (in this case 3.0),
> whereas the modules are built for 2.2, which is what the Shepherd
> depends on.
>
> The culprit is ‘local-eval’ in (guix scripts system), which simply uses
> ‘primitive-eval’ to evaluate the code, thus disregarding the Guile
> version that should be used.
>
> One possibility would be to instead evaluate the expression in a
> separate Guile process for the intended Guile version.
>
> I’m not sure it’s worth it though. The warnings will hopefully
> disappear soon when we upgrade everything to 3.0.
>
> Thoughts?
>
I believe it is ok to wait until the transition complete.
> Ludo’.
>
>
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 106 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.