From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:15:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39280: 27.0.60; wdired-get-filename ignores first argument Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 39280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 39280@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157998272014649 (code B ref -1); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:06:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2020 20:05:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56351 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivRgF-0003oD-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:05:20 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivRgD-0003o4-TJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:05:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivRgC-0008E2-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:05:17 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivRgB-0001Om-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:05:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:37358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivRgA-0001JY-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:05:15 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id w15so6152144wru.4 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:05:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=t3jVgJ8tUMt3gnlXIOsNwYKHikmRWMeEuH/oJ7hXCHs=; b=Bizj2yYFr/KKokfKMNh+wVivKO/eMTL+WhcP/ipFXDYC47Bx8Af3QmX+YA1XYGnwoC FrYtLRmFypCneRaCNYL9699RUeXTjasf0Y2kUAvEA24Jhy8LB3kQAldb+fTklYyR/Bf6 XTxwWLbzvUy8vvQTMm1qKudUf4LX72jJ0L4lPfe8PfziBEwk82X2nS45eNmNewgJDMPr 5FsGbO4C/t3Dy3skHcDOuiA3qzqAyvAw0ZF3wbdqvm+mrQL2QwP3VpLf9V/p/DuYp/AW SjvmKbV+WBCw5tQNB7+LLwh5a7vllkXnpPmZL50EGw56CUW5KuQblA4JA+fe5NAcpRJe Pvfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=t3jVgJ8tUMt3gnlXIOsNwYKHikmRWMeEuH/oJ7hXCHs=; b=NexjqG9mzCJ2zTr2vvAZ7IR9jWwO+PeSwZGN9v0rxf8qNSbM+AegsNBfvkpPkEWY43 kiaQ7JXXAmTmYDLCuARjJWvWR+zHeq2b1dNVTKjzw2bXund13QOyJ6UCDvLW8qpNlgvL 2fLmY3Ez7XNFngShxUMblwhhJZ8mvf8OyxiIQJy/J/cgBaI1y3kvChqnxH3GNSnZF0xL yn5sMotEE0j+No9V0Kge05HaDiCfXnJiCDBxNddWQdJwYipESH0z/u517hDjlGu1ETLA WWZOTZxlHVYcGegREuaXESPtY0H/S/u1IUFn7s5+Blgq9hkGX+TfYgcTZjpOpttr2brn MlvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWqCmnoOCwgNryGJs3X5u8nWcW7Hhvx6AJAuh5NIQv3FWZ4zi/p CA90lgDL2iyz3h3M30sO0qYQXz6T X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzCQX74Ka95Fvi0rMvX4RcI7HN/JrDY+xSV3mnNtE9r04/YNCUUH27cztVmyGu2B5WXXv/Vhg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f990:: with SMTP id f16mr11997828wrr.185.1579982713008; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp ([31.7.242.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q124sm2992863wme.2.2020.01.25.12.05.11 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:05:12 -0800 (PST) From: Tino Calancha Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87k15fpaj2.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::436 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: emacs -Q /tmp M-! touch foo RET g j foo RET C-x C-q M-: (wdired-get-filename 'local t) RET => "/tmp/foo" ;; Expected: "foo" --88--- commit 5f7e8975e741298718a4e05aa674873207cb56a6 Author: Tino Calancha Date: Sat Jan 25 21:03:53 2020 +0100 Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tino.calancha[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) emacs -Q /tmp M-! touch foo RET g j foo RET C-x C-q M-: (wdired-get-filename 'local t) RET => "/tmp/foo" ;; Expected: "foo" --8<-----------------------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 5f7e8975e741298718a4e05aa674873207cb56a6 Author: Tino Calancha Date: Sat Jan 25 21:03:53 2020 +0100 Fix bug in wdired-get-filename * lisp/wdired.el (wdired-get-filename): Acknowledge the first argument. * test/lisp/wdired-tests.el (wdired-test-bug39280): Add test. diff --git a/lisp/wdired.el b/lisp/wdired.el index d470e0a21b..23dc4b9ef5 100644 --- a/lisp/wdired.el +++ b/lisp/wdired.el @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ wdired-get-filename ;; Don't unquote the old name, it wasn't quoted in the first place (and file (setq file (wdired-normalize-filename file (not old))))) (if (or no-dir old) - file + (if no-dir (file-relative-name file) file) (and file (> (length file) 0) (concat (dired-current-directory) file)))))) diff --git a/test/lisp/wdired-tests.el b/test/lisp/wdired-tests.el index baa547758e..3d5f504205 100644 --- a/test/lisp/wdired-tests.el +++ b/test/lisp/wdired-tests.el @@ -176,6 +176,22 @@ wdired-test-bug34915 (server-force-delete) (delete-directory test-dir t)))) +(ert-deftest wdired-test-bug39280 () + "Test for https://debbugs.gnu.org/39280." + (let* ((test-dir (make-temp-file "test-dir" 'dir)) + (fname "foo") + (full-fname (expand-file-name fname test-dir))) + (make-empty-file full-fname) + (let ((buf (find-file-noselect test-dir))) + (unwind-protect + (with-current-buffer buf + (dired-toggle-read-only) + (dolist (old '(t nil)) + (should (equal fname (wdired-get-filename 'nodir old))) + (should (equal full-fname (wdired-get-filename nil old)))) + (wdired-finish-edit)) + (if buf (kill-buffer buf)) + (delete-directory test-dir t))))) (provide 'wdired-tests) ;;; wdired-tests.el ends here --8<-----------------------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- In GNU Emacs 27.0.60 (build 24, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.5) of 2020-01-25 built on calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp Repository revision: baca81e64141aed076fe088e7160f6e0d4a51c68 Repository branch: emacs-27 Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12004000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. (Shell command succeeded with no output) Press C-c C-c when finished or C-c ESC to abort changes "/tmp/foo" Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUND GPM DBUS GSETTINGS GLIB NOTIFY INOTIFY ACL LIBSELINUX GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE HARFBUZZ M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 XDBE XIM MODULES THREADS LIBSYSTEMD PDUMPER LCMS2 GMP From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:15:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39280: 27.0.60; wdired-get-filename ignores first argument Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tino Calancha Cc: 39280@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39280.157998573719222 (code B ref 39280); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 39280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2020 20:55:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivSSv-0004zy-2t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:55:37 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivSSs-0004zj-C7 for 39280@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:55:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579985727; bh=YIgRGvBcaJYWWZL0sk6Gk4O5z44xcuZx+GtynZC62SE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=b6AQsdd9cCsV4PmUjEi3Zs9LMkzoqF05I8A75bBoJKLrYwsDBbqHo/0KbCBXam+tR OBGweePhT+I07mb3poRsv6AZ6k2RqnIvmoCCPJUbY9ZT/eTq/AmAhRGxWM6PGf1+tl Q2ouXMBX6jvneLZmC4iy8lorycrqvW1+kdE8ZiZE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from strobe-lfs84 ([84.61.243.180]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MzQg6-1jqbU71B6u-00vQXN; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:55:27 +0100 From: Stephen Berman References: <87k15fpaj2.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:55:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k15fpaj2.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> (Tino Calancha's message of "Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:05 +0100") Message-ID: <87tv4j1cjm.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wh5KUNeM8t9sl7Fy8freBDfUaTUP9jNTs+xagdO2AAbSxGKuAnh NzXuJZHrl67R280LawlnX5PS2eug0CzoqyiyVlMj2Zi1A1bDg/AlhPRIazWzTRcxVfID48H 3mmjNTmYnUDJWEa+YudtCCGaNW0IPfSUcmZRXTmLUnGhWUntuujMKsRc/izauPJv7z3P0ko BAOG2cAXhZokTD6GTtV/w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ANIfzkGWP/g=:XdddbvhpKesdbVnWRhYKwu OTMBNcX7UVOV9Xzwmz8L2d6XxElHIRf2C919Zn7GCPhmetq6EPIAxceqqnZ/FuDWPl2bL38kS 5NurVEh+HGDWGnrIm2a5noRt1DpLXLV2S3Iqj3JCSax1uxfw0syC9ZR/TXk8PXpBz0jYz+E8D c1iEAmwq7WneF5j/bDx5RkuJhEpnBFvkqKX8phwrr31DEzey8T5B+dFCDFOoJEHzVf5d6Ewbc upToj1GRa78hB71+tvOcnNc4itnyN55o2jB6tXgjXPgX1n+TQGJa1CpUfJEe+WaN7qphinO42 117DLTIcFPNAaPFSm6mgoQ92qfZJ+nvanNnx3rP1OrpTUKDiHZoVP7H7ITA1ryzUAl6IE3b+G 9Brz35oo+BcBMzppmS+GtfS5NYAEAEq9jc1g6dstb+/8dpUZmnG5HTJcW9vg+VB+OWWp3hvPa mNqdT5Mtwwr4R9UjF1Zp5oAjSShnkSgaJIbV8pllbhRRhK/4+oaTz5ahdQ/+c+YSkyQZSljkU 4mXjH489vVCIDYzlQWpDkR8DJg7zcBzwHHj48XAr961RAy5IypIi1HVdAazFspjN4fYvXrx8x gbg/E/fAJTLIEAP0pScOAF19SRun7HHkU76MXfwIKRt8n4Nktxaam/mwmPNeYMye7SwrLfQHR y4v0U9w0WiQf1qqbhUKoAEwHu70J5e7XPOJnjjAT/xY+rNbSol3Lp72db+vUVypmPqzOj/5LG IsKgqMtXGIEh6dqxQHe/5WUR77mbY+QbgREyGeQFc9IVgQw1Rl7maXpsfj5OcSbDM5t1WVdqc jKnHwYEdfBBUB/UzuUWxcakvtYh20hvMq/t6gwPSg/emiV/6m6w7SjgeeV7sBKEhbexmLNdtB 0689sO4Ve4cLezXELPRLYXtjPwl7dzjEpsdsgA9X6QxT+LSs921jonYk+Nm3ZGap6FBGHL276 K5hyRSFCd10xUxYPwGbY1K0qXbpn0d4bMTN9wt24EUID0MUkeG1/JL+GkQH0fVBNSJ2Be/wBX hKiQx1um7FmsyQjTW8aZI/oG559ZLWcxpcO7Aut+iRBas0b5SSdVUQfjIWEayn+L7QRLWZbK9 sKaJ3U1LlbN1xVSfVhWlXuLcLbtFsvvJRsUi7C2mCmJce0ITQP5rSFIyd03vzJF7Fd4pLL+cl xyYfs1JmUBTm4UGxzv6Z7zgySFgVrv/25Co2+WaR2tK8D8kbSG1yeIlfcbgFP1x2lMNlaDNb7 Kk313XkUqHv6hRx6a X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:05 +0100 Tino Calancha wrote: > emacs -Q /tmp > M-! touch foo RET > g > j foo RET > C-x C-q > M-: (wdired-get-filename 'local t) RET > => "/tmp/foo" > ;; Expected: "foo" Do you have a use case for this? AFAICS in wdired.el there are no uses of wdired-get-filename with both of its arguments non-nil. Steve Berman From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:15:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39280: 27.0.60; wdired-get-filename ignores first argument Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stephen Berman Cc: 39280@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha Received: via spool by 39280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39280.157998679920891 (code B ref 39280); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 39280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2020 21:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivSk2-0005Qt-Tn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 16:13:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:41758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivSk1-0005Qg-Ge for 39280@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 16:13:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id c9so6245570wrw.8 for <39280@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:13:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=WcPELuFUAgQluhIPgJCnsRNQCUUGKYEILjXNEdgVvSs=; b=JxGD/HBElFWVxqk+fkl98ZvV6he/OjSC89k2YIrE+XAm38o3jQXhDL1E2eJg3/RbZ1 m1z4fImz6/R3UaHcfl3LCyAWAW0xP64qVIRZJd0wBiGh41fXn+kzWZQKwUUDEPyD+AkO uzicBkGdiLTIVIuWO+JJ2X09ru4GcxGIhCuXvEEF8qs8+0qd4H3Dw3mqc4InHr+V4svy 4BooErlSUhKeYfjtVU3YiPXMcJVEm+mqUvBGxOz/rf62W9l+eGfnjlXAABh7UZC5X9oy dQnd5pAbIgC9GIELVabn7QUQOmUQqSe0nrxBvLJaHqsLMwO53J3ZQnGyevbPA9NHALEb CFEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WcPELuFUAgQluhIPgJCnsRNQCUUGKYEILjXNEdgVvSs=; b=bEFHKovOz/0fdJSDWe6o3+ORorzrwVfrByNeV4gSlcJmKC+9AspUPmLJfdW0tl9oCf aLs59dfdjKkrLE4hbCsOqX6ELNpFalPRNbjU36zujapdF6iYo//DigzPjdzmbrT8pbgm 4i8grQRibfkI0n+egwV/kRSSdkk9RZkAmmaOooNBGRaKifWu8N+0fk+wjRCCPYkwFq9x Ymz237SACp9sSNHGC6huXCZpcHKScOm/NAp30nUQnb5kAWyfOUCHuD1IdiGxz2E3cWpc f/7t/dNop425TNSXggN4Y36tneyhdB0iiy0jGp1O1w0qOsFVZ1/rQEZYNcYoCFku789a IAJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVScIQLeJmJ/PABY1oC1Zaeq12iuozBtYUHaUGRbc8qkAOK+z/M neGY0lKX7gEoFwX4AsPVphc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy53GF7942OMikL3UiAAr65cPQYj+f5GZG7+7fbik0Tb15bGIYFNbu6dIvNeF2fEbb/SeysNw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f308:: with SMTP id i8mr11922172wro.42.1579986791668; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:13:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp ([31.7.242.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm13622814wrh.5.2020.01.25.13.13.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:13:11 -0800 (PST) From: Tino Calancha X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:13:10 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp In-Reply-To: <87tv4j1cjm.fsf@gmx.net> Message-ID: References: <87k15fpaj2.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <87tv4j1cjm.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:05 +0100 Tino Calancha wrote: > >> emacs -Q /tmp >> M-! touch foo RET >> g >> j foo RET >> C-x C-q >> M-: (wdired-get-filename 'local t) RET >> => "/tmp/foo" >> ;; Expect [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tino.calancha[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.43 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.3 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email service X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:05 +0100 Tino Calancha wrote: > >> emacs -Q /tmp >> M-! touch foo RET >> g >> j foo RET >> C-x C-q >> M-: (wdired-get-filename 'local t) RET >> => "/tmp/foo" >> ;; Expected: "foo" > > Do you have a use case for this? No, I don't have one. > AFAICS in wdired.el there are no uses > of wdired-get-filename with both of its arguments non-nil. Right, that's why we haven't detected this bug before. I was playing a bit with wdired this month, and when I tried to call this function with both args non-nil I got unexpected results. From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:15:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39280: 27.0.60; wdired-get-filename ignores first argument Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 10:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tino Calancha Cc: 39280@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39280.158003563831781 (code B ref 39280); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 10:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 39280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2020 10:47:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56547 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivfRm-0008GX-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 05:47:18 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:32887) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ivfRk-0008GJ-5A for 39280@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 05:47:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1580035628; bh=fpBBzOgfRWA3fTTU2QYTqn9/xrVB/Modl/Wt/ZxEqMI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=J4L78sZfcoPPB3iRD4UQpAKbReHmK/C1WOLphWybr3FOGyNQjumgksYTRkTiDGKZY 9qb1YT1+4Bt41SMwo0SyCSuh7YIg+n276cICzKZVCKKCATBTWH2wW+iHXdUB/gB3No 6ZUV9Z/SqJkuFTkIFQia5hET4xB/RYJVgX98XiDE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from strobe-lfs84 ([178.6.103.189]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N6bk4-1jfLs20FBO-0185Cd; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:47:08 +0100 From: Stephen Berman References: <87k15fpaj2.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <87tv4j1cjm.fsf@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:47:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:13:10 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <87ftg2v6j9.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Y99AnO5/aUrB9wQbtiWB8e+zJs2bHnyUy7bzybDqVeNaINF/U6k mg1IQPM41BA4aijE5sHDtZpRBynWRnAOqNvsPphwaTVOLwf1PAnCm6t2aBZXn83SFwJXgg5 xeXDp18fwfdJ6KeSulg+2x1puW/Y0rllS/KRx7ZbgAkubBOslJsz6GU06BXJuuNlCsKOnRI 9xCN7eZcqGTsvssGvxm+Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:0yejUg2AHFw=:Dsyrvgjj9FX4TTs64TvJVb 2ugJXLh5PxxxRLbxbUb/WZC7wkaTqn7BNMlQuf444oWf4enAdTnM1ohNaSY1fOEoxqXC+WJZ6 pqIj4hLtv7zwkMVR3NaS3Ds0bE0BeGdYVk9AZQzqWTpiuFfxg+6jKB2LnibXdD8GB50LxQhy/ lnzwXF6gBK8rjvjOTqRYUR2EZlcTvAlvv9+qJP7BpTmVGqaGwSbewBAlxEiR9mkuAv8KHVmux 07ZmAjGWIGDctQWrIrUme9GwJycpjvUr83SQXY2x747Vb/pPCtpxdA74G3hJEpewwWdjnEhWY JRZb6JoD77SiO3TA/EaTdnT95s4rR7FK4gEnYVqotuyWgCeAPzI4wz0tUbyvclZJ5ze0oDg8R ZMRStGhS0jAde6Hlpcazijsm3gaHkkjZ7EN55ZOz4/5MZIbf52sU1JZnap0PufSTkII+kOuOl KE5nEWgxiMBSfxH7FaLDYEbtEvanfRJYReQv8Dz7pWjuI714dTBUqEl/wWBX1K69CBlkvfTVO C46V1QhIr+zozwDGSOCo0VzjErDuf/b/EpoJPxZZA6vdhtumO+/7Tr3MmX84S/RgwgZLMf3fr Tw4yCq+wyAvab/ZcVRo22M/HRepgHXz2CXhzWiCcBdMSh4vTbt5U0lAoLpUVKKeualhOtxvig kbePYCJJMrfTBIjryCehqyc/X6JgYUNmYl1UjkwXID67LiopRxiLuF0DEPupP+lLVc0Z+4ai9 tgrLqPF7VrT/YZLWW/hGW09fcN4Kbt5KnuZfRyZhtJtg8EB/VvXuEWUCnq9XUQQRVBspLABkp e74hy+8yndUPMbbFgengI2o7nYfyv7UbcZ8y5QZri3E0/Way+bhLBKgoF8YDdCt/FmY4ankrs cDnrF9kf66W//qnxSXk183A20Ubrrp0/xfU2xlQz4w5HIMTabhFne3bBuTZbGiqH7hHraNREt /JncigCMiN/QzL+zyusriNiMlIVjLKAlsKnTzAsTtjDu+vuDxNsj6/XqyBtjV7zIye1dTXDDE QLWniKfaTdCQsRMkttUUxN42hgZSxbHgvqLXrZL3S5DCy9LEE8jZS94B7yzp8Iv1RD9E7lqbq FAASKHqeMG2chC4wcLGmfH1DFC/Utif72N/rC7sR09HCW0ZEKa7Q2wgpuZC0FEUraK/9b0iwZ hs4815VA7eRKkb6ridp4dgOfDMwW5Dm9IGZ9KF+FdogtZSkS55ARW1v2w8xl66Vty7DteEVgX i+TcXQNW8JRJdsT5R X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:13:10 +0100 (CET) Tino Calancha wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, Stephen Berman wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:05 +0100 Tino Calancha wrote: >> >>> emacs -Q /tmp >>> M-! touch foo RET >>> g >>> j foo RET >>> C-x C-q >>> M-: (wdired-get-filename 'local t) RET >>> => "/tmp/foo" >>> ;; Expected: "foo" >> >> Do you have a use case for this? > No, I don't have one. I see you do now, as a possible fix for bug#39284. >> AFAICS in wdired.el there are no uses >> of wdired-get-filename with both of its arguments non-nil. > > Right, that's why we haven't detected this bug before. > I was playing a bit with wdired this month, and when I tried > to call this function with both args non-nil I got unexpected results. Ok. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 23 09:16:04 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2020 13:16:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52316 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9pqu-0004OH-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:16:04 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com ([209.85.219.179]:35840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9pqt-0004HR-2N for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:16:03 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id g3so3680194ybc.3 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 06:16:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2CA5GmBfXQMAGJd+lCcrCHKXeWUbq7eykMfZry1511k=; b=ZqQjknOZPld21ukbW6S42f8Ss8t68OM47t378ZRD9dnqEb+Ng0h7R8BaFUY8D5+fIX TGsnnJmsqsTKS3NZi9lBushfL0yrkiMYhK+vOWMzIi8FOS0hjyAjbHJ//eVhSGM6UiCR vD5+VxqounLzOZSXoNCbpUwDIgHANMDUN4G+o0enPf6RDV6ztFtcCwkPuheKflXUIiC/ LHcLrh/OtQzXcSsVRRZy0LWYQekDjh9qXNqVQDUFYhGqjeeQVYHUMz28KGn0FoRVBdF4 th35HTsnXv4R1a5IWji533fxR9fuk7mF4hKQAibfge7PFSw7cYPcicKE+x7qFkoZAKfs 1DvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hUdQoy51YNK8rtOYrnOosGoAnImB24+nGZbd/AzOs2lZ3FSKa e+rHN/XEqbYHlCgQ77aQ/+a07+bfdMbxQqyyToaC/WE4a/s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU8rXcNEBiflx1qxsU9Gnd0XxKOW7WBx41IplPZhxAmYyaqqoUzsGvdtNXdg+DjBTxYNgYiD4JyPCe/gy/Hiw= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4609:: with SMTP id t9mr1522407yba.231.1598188557697; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 06:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:57 -0400 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 39280 + patch thanks Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.179 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 39280 + patch thanks Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.179 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty tags 39280 + patch thanks From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:15:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39280: 27.0.60; wdired-get-filename ignores first argument Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stephen Berman Cc: 39280@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha Received: via spool by 39280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39280.16015876086578 (code B ref 39280); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 21:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 39280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2020 21:26:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO66C-0001i2-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 17:26:48 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO66A-0001hm-RJ for 39280@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 17:26:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gv4ov3N0sPb/vqtZjxSD2wXj+xOEfXzqE3mGol5EVQQ=; b=eTHnRi+bEEtHLZIs5cJ+yy0X4m Y9l1ruJUUhelYYTjf7J6hWga2LnYEKZgH6Y/PIgn1Bw/2ZA9rxMngUZs57GGoG9e+psAgIWJE9QR+ lQKxscS6ZQFHNM/OLGSUGekrpSQQ17l3M5gk4PjXhknRbKwYElud4z/wNJmdHbfSSI0U=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kO65u-0003bj-Dp; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:26:40 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87k15fpaj2.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <87tv4j1cjm.fsf@gmx.net> <87ftg2v6j9.fsf@gmx.net> X-Now-Playing: Joanna Newsom's _The Milk-Eyed Mender_: ""En Gallop"" Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:26:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ftg2v6j9.fsf@gmx.net> (Stephen Berman's message of "Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:47:06 +0100") Message-ID: <87lfgpzlh6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stephen Berman writes: >>> Do you have a use case for this? >> No, I don't have one. > > I see you do now, as a possible fix for bug#39284. Looks like this wasn't applied at the time, but if I read the patch correctly, it looks like the right fix to me, so I've applied it to Emacs 28 now. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stephen Berman writes: >>> Do you have a use case for this? >> No, I don't have one. > > I see you do now, as a possible fix for bug#39284. Looks like this wasn't applied at the time, but if I read the patch correctly, it looks like the right fix to me, so I've applied it to Emacs 28 now. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 01 17:26:54 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2020 21:26:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO66I-0001iL-Ou for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 17:26:54 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO66H-0001hv-1Q for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 17:26:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cSF9kM9QLXmS3frBDUDUK52+mtemxH4PPlapPk22IeE=; b=eApl5YGmXNTqrst4PcfUcLt6TG d1V+ysUBbSc0UkHd8RbPEtTKAeR1NWY/cD/1M0mEnf5yKuRScqSQG/QTzvZFy4oJD0wOD0oK+GWLn nY4qUGtLmDhPqFWSldxY8KCPXYmCn+WXk1MvhCxxP31nuq52PAJYk/upvsv+l/gPhq7s=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kO669-0003bw-9I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:26:47 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:26:44 +0200 Message-Id: <87k0w9zlgr.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #39280 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 39280 fixed close 39280 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 39280 fixed close 39280 28.1 quit