GNU bug report logs - #39181
27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #65 received at 39181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
Cc: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>, 39181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi
 layout
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:17:59 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 3:18 PM, Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Other than the nit picks below, I have one question: is there any
> difference between "window layout" and "window configuration" in this
> context? You seem to be using both interchangeably, both in
> documentation and the function/variable names. There seems to be some
> prior usage of "layout" in gdb-mi, but the general Emacs term AFAIK is
> "configuration". Wouldn't it make sense to unify the usage somewhat, at
> least in the new code? Just an observation (I found it confusing.)
> 

No, not really, that’s my fault. Before I go in and change every word, which one do you think I should use: configuration or layout? Configuration is the conventional Emacs term but I felt that layout is easier to understand for a user. If you are find with both I guess I will change all to configuration.

Yuan 
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 122 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.