From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: yyoncho Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15791579778021 (code B ref -1); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:00:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2020 06:59:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1irz7u-00025E-My for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:59:37 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47212) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1irz7p-000250-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:59:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irz7o-0002uJ-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:59:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1irz7n-0003IZ-9e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:59:28 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::135]:43786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1irz7l-0003HC-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:59:27 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 9so14719590lfq.10 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:59:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=E6UsOtHVzCTta1EFrHTq9OFqwDW3bIllS0OnIsRin+4=; b=fkViV6fEHWTMRpobAYBRjuYNlaE1W0rsmIIEhC/ZpdpqO7ezawVQ50t2WfwyEkz6HV gC2u75wdw4ngNXGmdIxuFRXzfW1qG04m8gK9Pe32e03cBjLfeV9sXuLcFqWfI8TqJO5u uz+6FYIBUoSSudKPM4p0MZ5EzThGej9mlrbzi6gsm+jnpB7c8swgfcK9TOwWggytTPZY 0/flGk9h5IoR5q2unf6P/RUV/z9uM+J4BMXsTiWcRlalbivxeoi3OYdln8lgMw+MJCbB m49mn2D3rzQEiPEf8qWQcL3XiUFy9DP6bcOw4EUG3+1fQQwchbld5Ymb14txGndlwNuB vLig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=E6UsOtHVzCTta1EFrHTq9OFqwDW3bIllS0OnIsRin+4=; b=fdIOG6JRie9W/qGZlHBpi9b64k8rHtLIIT80xITXSJkZvxB8/162NZYe2XX0BIf/83 pVlPcIvFScE6ZOqxFOcWPQr3EhN9ix9UAW4MlXFCwFiF7tpU5SvGs1y5DU7X499CcKoh eun8WDlnRzKWN9XHs0/BTrT4e7VihdlvTPPGixKs9MVpKH7cJl1yOQ9D5ga23kClUtXx v1qKmXw25Pu8HUigmlcuirTBopsCZspNJLUz+MdYFNTjQ+EzO5N09hkBPADMVP4G3OA+ is9p1mJS7qc8D2QVJkeDY8Whc7bkYdYWFeDNb4wYRsZCz2ysvbX+Q48h6Z8bUUzOjnZj qxbA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9B25I2NcfMgtxa4pPFV3Hi150xYFG4qGwQz1RF4kLhgvwPryh hzS2jUciAgQrMCrJr/0O4wpIQRf1DTCbF+uPN5S3yypA X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPuhCz38ZS2UGjXQTFGabcmKc5za3m6qNT+SnPTos253tNnqKCKqt3VaDMC8K0UYdDBELqbrACTikoOd1lnUY= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c1c1:: with SMTP id r184mr1648181lff.128.1579157964133; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:59:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: yyoncho Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:59:12 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f19f4059c3c5dbf" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::135 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --0000000000007f19f4059c3c5dbf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer :filter ,(lambda (cmd) (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) cmd))) (with-temp-buffer (with-output-to-string (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) This outputs: \"Called in *temp*\" Expected: the filter function must be called in *scratch* since this is the buffer you want to check the bindings. --0000000000007f19f4059c3c5dbf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer)
(define-key global-ma=
p (kbd "C-c C-l r") 
=C2=A0 `(menu-item "2" switch-t=
o-buffer
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 :filter ,(lamb=
da (cmd)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(print (format "Called in %s" (current=
-buffer)))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0cmd)))
(with-temp-buffer
=C2=A0 (with-=
output-to-string
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer &qu=
ot;*scratch*") [3 12] t)))

This outputs:

\"Called i=
n =C2=A0*temp*\"

Expected: the filter function must be called i=
n *scratch* since this is
the buffer you want to check the bindings.
=
--0000000000007f19f4059c3c5dbf-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: yyoncho Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16040678025584 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 14:23:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYVJK-0001S0-Dd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:23:22 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYVJI-0001Rk-OE for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:23:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NMFsD0VJP18irueR97DNojDEg8JpeGM2nIw81Ci+IVQ=; b=pXiqPMdG+uPXu5+R+KQ/Gp7WHx Drlg6jvg3kgSrePbkTkTbntQYT+eoyfgmG/SDQovOAvVPcVblU/IYsvGn09Haf4iMVNHGsxUo2u74 1HHTfvkkfbC7UzCs4OU5wkSnQMbOnKGzFbmcGWiOBEQNaUY2aQ99j0RzmgCSWhT/EGcM=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kYVJ8-00010h-PB; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:14 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: X-Now-Playing: African Head Charge's _Drastic Season_: "Snake In The Hole" Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (yyoncho@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:59:12 +0200") Message-ID: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: yyoncho writes: > To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) > (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") > `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer > :filter ,(lambda (cmd) > (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) > cmd) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) yyoncho writes: > To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) > (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") > `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer > :filter ,(lambda (cmd) > (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) > cmd))) > (with-temp-buffer > (with-output-to-string > (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) > > This outputs: > > \"Called in *temp*\" I tried this recipe, but I'm not getting the :filter function called at all. Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that reproduces this bug? And your report didn't include the data about the version generated by report-emacs-bug, so it's hard to guess whether bug is only on some specific system. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 30 10:23:34 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 14:23:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYVJV-0001SO-No for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:23:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYVJM-0001Rp-R1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:23:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7gbtWp8rEIUrlU+SJkZNuGE82HjZ+PmKTZqkEnwJWrY=; b=fNy73L1d+bZtCwfPegxOdDZGDd VUE2guWdtOX0vs/9W1dmOmNw8AHA+b57Py0L+YqNeNjQbTLJ8Ri9wRbp9Tqerq+JN//1HbGnuKg5o DRt9rpKhj5ASyyjhB/19zp7ekY2NpI0c5m6cHRkgzy+/M3f26/GILaXXUaJog1YCdiX0=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kYVJF-00010p-4D for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0100 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:15 +0100 Message-Id: <871rhfhjxo.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #39149 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 39149 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 39149 + moreinfo quit From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: yyoncho Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16040709938168 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 15:16:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59270 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYW8n-00027Q-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:16:33 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:45017) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYW8l-00024j-CQ for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:16:32 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CN5W20kjdz1rvxn; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CN5W175TKz1qv52; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BU6A41Mi8DVv; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:29 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: nuEXJkOdRCuFM0GX8IUBfflR6u4IG3xo6rxOViLfORRa5batC1w0LeKlq7zPQLck Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-190-51.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.190.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB85D2C0B97; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:27 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab References: X-Yow: Maybe we could paint GOLDIE HAWN a rich PRUSSIAN BLUE-- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (yyoncho@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:59:12 +0200") Message-ID: <874kmbbv78.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On Jan 16 2020, yyoncho wrote: > To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) > > (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") > `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer > :filter ,(lambda (cmd) > (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) > cmd))) > (with-temp-buffer > (with-output-to-string > (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) > > This outputs: > > \"Called in *temp*\" > > Expected: the filter function must be called in *scratch* since this is > the buffer you want to check the bindings. The problem is that describe-buffer-bindings only changes the buffer to look up the bindings, but everything that generates the description (starting with describe-map-tree) doesn't know about that other buffer. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: yyoncho Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160407410924640 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 16:08:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYWx3-0006PM-BQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:08:29 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f171.google.com ([209.85.208.171]:34743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYWx2-0006P8-6K for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:08:28 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f171.google.com with SMTP id y16so7510321ljk.1 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:08:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0IdOs1+O+UjV8iqV412P8ozruuAktwXgozXpuTHwdX8=; b=G/kiAEoaozwkNHdp0Rsac1Kh823citLisMrt3y/wpPIYgj9/go0qmw80ZHMfYPKKZD Bw+pOqmnwP81XPumrWJbo9UvcYT2zGJD55r3bCDIEHVoi10gZY8QbMwBGKmF3KwqQGon urblRd0Zbm03+5EAqttAELOuwrOi58W3VvpcLgIMwaKAV6DiI94idA81AXJISy7CVIiF e/h0XuLtf+5UN+LJUrFXhvws6oTtI6It76PUPZo6b92Tov6+XXZee+H/6mTlmZFJYoP0 fctmnleovTjYXM4l76ESsrtHEdApLW7uJ3Lsuuk7DYN0uLzHqb/0iIDqJAtmKxh4V9Xy nzyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0IdOs1+O+UjV8iqV412P8ozruuAktwXgozXpuTHwdX8=; b=H/EDGct8VZ5WdCf7JC+DhEebONA4zZbOG0KDYYckWcmUaybK+Lraqae93223/n45ql /omtMyCCc2u/0JUN1945jjF/L10Sd/iRpJEmyy7UtziY+GALVL8PpleR+W6HBw/m9mF8 Cb7JctDql9P4ufHxGYuyXMAnWb0xYndrtdEDf7mSsXWFStDmnNjhqGofTqw/4BhgcCUO 2H1HdoELcE6Eqo+yXKdY8xn4oWvLGU6MKAgqzPLEGdMJkWLOVH+reDM/Quj9HEID/tbl yo9nH5LG3bbQUCKPaUxMILemEaZpIk4EdRfXJ5QJBwijlzSJTLqNFMmAm7KfScQg15A9 ui9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XvreW+83KWC4Ck2Pp5lgzW1TcSG1hMegc0NSysywUCxQdSTMv WObn2ABkBnTVULxfvjZ2+MqV5HnLjHfSkJcvBxc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyM7V22Md8L6jLwawTXi8AmcLvR61jWLh4bTa/zNtjzg3TlLveoAzl61vzpwyeCpOfxuLYHOrka/FXobT9QumI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4fa:: with SMTP id s26mr1440467ljm.133.1604074102127; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> From: yyoncho Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:08:10 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d020005b2e59b36" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000000d020005b2e59b36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I tested with emacs27.1 emacs27.1 -q Then pasted the code in scratch buffer, evaluated, and reproduced the described behaviour. Thanks, Ivan On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:23 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > yyoncho writes: > > > To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) > > (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") > > `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer > > :filter ,(lambda (cmd) > > (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) > > cmd))) > > (with-temp-buffer > > (with-output-to-string > > (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) > > > > This outputs: > > > > \"Called in *temp*\" > > I tried this recipe, but I'm not getting the :filter function called at > all. Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that reproduces > this bug? > > And your report didn't include the data about the version generated by > report-emacs-bug, so it's hard to guess whether bug is only on some > specific system. > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no > --0000000000000d020005b2e59b36 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I tested with emacs27.1

emacs27.1 -q=C2= =A0

Then pasted the code in scratch buffer, evalua= ted, and reproduced the described behaviour.


<= /div>
Thanks,
Ivan


On Fri, Oct 30, 2020= at 4:23 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
yyoncho <yyoncho@gmail.com> writes:

> To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer)
> (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r")
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0`(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0:filter ,(lambda= (cmd)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffe= r)))
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 cmd)))
> (with-temp-buffer
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0(with-output-to-string
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratc= h*") [3 12] t)))
>
> This outputs:
>
> \"Called in=C2=A0 *temp*\"

I tried this recipe, but I'm not getting the :filter function called at=
all.=C2=A0 Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that r= eproduces
this bug?

And your report didn't include the data about the version generated by<= br> report-emacs-bug, so it's hard to guess whether bug is only on some
specific system.

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--0000000000000d020005b2e59b36-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , yyoncho Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160407460325547 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 16:16:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYX50-0006dx-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:16:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:36905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYX4z-0006dl-Ls for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:16:42 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id o18so7256135edq.4 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:16:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OQr9vDoad7z4V36vDgk1bM6UvYn+SicRsNdKaCp7yrI=; b=kPCDkb5xtuGQfhxTPQRlBO5sP/zYdhbAetVwgvOH1Dgv4sMNQTZNdTkXR55yAH/mP4 evnIFTLKD/Y3vJTzBORNK8w3+a5294A2LSTiOyqGuQGSl8nnDX4u5v6Zt6KJeQ67QtpW oqu1CV93cCOEDoGYEzmqh08dmjj85ryCwbvurWVgNQuyXKElX5hyV52KmRY/AOyjrMEY Fy83YR4Wi1xjxJ1n/SsyyiX3zAfMk0cXTDB+5Fh41Kucv6IxTJLyts/QrhFsDQmCErWA vxpBPTylHqz0XtpKl0Xq7UcQ5MwYD2aLyQHKQqSDTKCNm8lVFVP73FW3zoVfkqU/9qUE D+pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OQr9vDoad7z4V36vDgk1bM6UvYn+SicRsNdKaCp7yrI=; b=fpK45qN65BHYWWr9rePlz7tO+GmV4t3kz9m4MRxPsftS/yrz/U9yDEXC0BjPEWR7gP 7gTZQFyKbp/Y0KmvPTG4IlydiPB5QMKu6gitquNMMIUiIQajmIzuDtNXIEX9mWJYSq1v fZwmC3hgz27VQJ7qEToTjrTx6x8srH4NWabcKZqxgnpM0AASByUVmG1zEaGN94f2GRm7 wPdU9tWGTqfILix9M3P3M2Kcxq/UWj4XZiGQufQ1SLL+wPNkmo3ZMgpkRSyRWbuLwY51 KFYrtqlBQQ22WiHq+oXDxeyD55oVWQGHOgk5BWfKAbuHnFRK1URudveyIPYrLlN4cXG+ jDJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kJ5NhOc0Ki4c1sukRlrFcXp41829xlHM6M5t5UhpnLqoSDPsZ I7QobGB2+hIgoYYl0C8W17hsqC1p1xaurx+qApU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFEBTxt31+THZfbn5b37dpH2+9mr3i94HlTsh0vtuuTV5LIsPuoRk9WAVlnciVzJSlcpHurj7wanH0gxoVloM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d28c:: with SMTP id w12mr3365427edq.282.1604074595935; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:35 +0000 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:35 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > yyoncho writes: > >> To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) >> (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") >> `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer >> :filter ,(lambda (cmd) >> (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))= ) >> cmd))) >> (with-temp-buffer >> (with-output-to-string >> (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) >> >> This outputs: >> >> \"Called in *temp*\" > > I tried this recipe, but I'm not getting the :filter function called at > all. Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that reproduces > this bug? > > And your report didn't include the data about the version generated by > report-emacs-bug, so it's hard to guess whether bug is only on some > specific system. I can reproduce the above on Emacs 26.3, but not on master. Note that there might have been changes here with the merge of scratch/substitute-command-keys. I tried hard to not introduce any regressions or even changes in behavior with that branch, but I might have failed to include the above bug... What is the result output here? Here, the last form evaluates to this on master: "=0C Global Bindings Starting With C-c C-l: key binding --- ------- =0C Function key map translations Starting With C-c C-l: key binding --- ------- " Is this correct? Should it do anything else in addition that it currently does not? From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Andreas Schwab , yyoncho Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160407501926303 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 16:23:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXBi-0006qB-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:23:39 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:37866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXBh-0006px-1c for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:23:37 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f48.google.com with SMTP id p9so9423940eji.4 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5Ti9lk676EtEajdskxb5q25pRV1Orx7EsA0/nAPAd28=; b=tAy+/TRAmqnvQsvGOgtAPM6x8pgqNvGbw2hc7690NVJVh4YhLG887LEGer+eN1gnvm BBJ22v5V4FmhVMp6H6cCprcuGNcK2Z8aVCwk9aBPHbA1MunJhDo2ftVnknRC/Y9BPAN6 KcH4YMwjCe4ui7PDloHjkGuBOpwMnXBIjoQTL+dbzJQV43eEUpkp0m4ipkzuHtxhMPoj lsxBlePbKEnEsNjDmq7LSRvKeC+aDPdEyNcOBLo3g5WYpYiCqOd1gJ+BBkDGMGIY8vIP xz/jma3Jgg3Hm29ZLhmJt4rbcBVAruJj6f3ggRmvbxT2qTR7QpgtYlnPLmctJrD0jiDR QABg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5Ti9lk676EtEajdskxb5q25pRV1Orx7EsA0/nAPAd28=; b=Qact0Zsi3cbuVP2Sbk4jx6KKbtb4W3cT7yHOBA4tQ0Jan5tYwIXdhYd6eF/H5ziXhP Y36MAnSy9IM6VKPmj2n39XHhouTCGoj8bmPt6DZAdkuWVrKMlO5xDtG6q+PfvvQfLuYM g0Wt3/rC59i8hmenKxvEZpXAxaCeDa6SNPSNw0lxVuH/Bln4B+ia8aX9JogR5txen4dp Ao7YEWOZE6fmnN7oBhmcRixROCVZVa6yubVrAmZWJ7pd5xiqMpwqkTtCoA2tdVvCyPHm d1AwD0fg1y5Mkj7zwBmIemkxt43z27OpUUJoIY7zankg7KoNK9bH7N3+UugmMmH17nX6 hEFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53378CLtCjjsXuWBCoo0WuNEgLkyODvMmD9fUCFxVlKKqC4b2dU3 /f+5ZI8C7f9wSKbYSJcuxpRKue0JE1E9UmyphNxHFb3p X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLdt7kzLuF16rgzwNO5eUVzZ681lIfnENZrsph1VcjQiNCHWIcbHMwCZRUzz8sYNTzarJuzxaBi220Ir4duYs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8058:: with SMTP id x24mr3373589ejw.272.1604075011340; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:23:31 +0000 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <874kmbbv78.fsf@igel.home> References: <874kmbbv78.fsf@igel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:23:30 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andreas Schwab writes: > The problem is that describe-buffer-bindings only changes the buffer to > look up the bindings, but everything that generates the description > (starting with describe-map-tree) doesn't know about that other buffer. BTW, does anyone know why describe-map and describe-map-tree currently inserts its result into buffer instead of just returning a string? From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: yyoncho Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16040755852949 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 16:33:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXKr-0000lV-5d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:33:05 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com ([209.85.167.42]:37192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXKp-0000l1-V5 for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:33:04 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id j30so8649512lfp.4 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:33:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M2hBYKkfTTxNXEtZZymy45MGtHe2/1UYR/T/Bjz0IRw=; b=OHwlpHIL8jIFkU+WXxs8ooG+S1N1q2yoq+fChVz5FUOYLsB1+mf2dXzW29TVram/x8 ceChPfliG9bBu49g6g0BDZAsAJ50j6PEr9NYEDI/TcrldkkQ4v8G5LTPjo9Win7AGBjJ Rei5J4jMcBkDDCgmlOC0a4TzjfvB83/g7oAQdyLvKl7ce2Jq7bxpBA9t2osdSnujUkyX l+KLZEbGV0kONx38hrWFGcAoawodTQRVJl5RbXK42aEllA95ACSSm/lL5Hgioc584pDA m9R5x+P1rslTVjW4CfAb+F3QJJ3Vmxxq3yGsDLfeliIaNHYHZbR/OjI1xah6W61E1rzK USWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M2hBYKkfTTxNXEtZZymy45MGtHe2/1UYR/T/Bjz0IRw=; b=trfVGQlSDs0sqY+Pv/G2WeHGKR7IujcpY7irugr//kcs91blr64gDGnY5KVyH90nQ4 HOspx7z2TspzwCnAPV54uR+6I3qm3zdbFhI9OPsg+Kuig4tHkQKaZQgVOR/AiO768083 /EQkiTX2MihYzrVtiMaLQ152N+dziYzEm0QxbhJRMvfWVRbbibvQP9EEru90sJp/NOdC mJvtm+XdnusVfVUt9EixeGHdS92jEJQif5Nxu0GmWVTovXmnotXCZjmGz2MlSHSRJHyv b94Ri2/IufLvNI5Wc6FqEu4kUpqyicnT7zyAoe07nNAonm4MP+Mru5UwtAuQ5THBSGwJ ewSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ngKcnyYTADO+sY0jpw76TeY8AnvPxSs4/w1/3oKEtY+X67K1V TtlkyBIrjXXk4O9xM5wVsWmVsOEaNt3Ku8RoDKQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9XgWGkaC/oBA4gA6HgSvjAMFUdRIZqEPjN+Nrl8sQSTo+JN2F0pTfsulnolNxvrdLjbrBurTAJjDgGJDx1yU= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4842:: with SMTP id v63mr1260667lfa.278.1604075577977; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:32:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874kmbbv78.fsf@igel.home> In-Reply-To: From: yyoncho Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:32:46 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000004b1a505b2e5f363" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --00000000000004b1a505b2e5f363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Even better will be if there is some intermediate structured result which can be used by packages like which-key instead of parsing the string. On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 6:23 PM Stefan Kangas wrote: > Andreas Schwab writes: > > > The problem is that describe-buffer-bindings only changes the buffer to > > look up the bindings, but everything that generates the description > > (starting with describe-map-tree) doesn't know about that other buffer. > > BTW, does anyone know why describe-map and describe-map-tree currently > inserts its result into buffer instead of just returning a string? > --00000000000004b1a505b2e5f363 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Even better will be if there is some intermediate structur= ed result which can be used by packages like which-key instead of parsing t= he string.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 6:23 PM Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:

> The problem is that describe-buffer-bindings only changes the buffer t= o
> look up the bindings, but everything that generates the description > (starting with describe-map-tree) doesn't know about that other bu= ffer.

BTW, does anyone know why describe-map and describe-map-tree currently
inserts its result into buffer instead of just returning a string?
--00000000000004b1a505b2e5f363-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16040763804186 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 16:46:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXXg-00015S-BF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:46:20 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:38478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXXd-00015F-Qr for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:46:19 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CN7Vc4J9Hz1rvyK; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:46:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CN7Vc2Pqhz1qv5K; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:46:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9cYQRdICZzL; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:46:15 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: BSZwD+iz7hEgq9DRV2MKPb2He9BTlXkKc6mj2j1NqgDpzOTMX8/vfVEphLtGVz+G Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-190-51.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.190.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:46:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6D542C0BBF; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:46:14 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab References: <874kmbbv78.fsf@igel.home> X-Yow: Okay, BARBRA STREISAND, I recognize you now!! Also EFREM ZIMBALIST, JUNIOR!! And BEAUMONT NEWHALL!! Everybody into th' BATHROOM! Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:46:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:23:30 +0000") Message-ID: <87r1pfach5.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On Okt 30 2020, Stefan Kangas wrote: > BTW, does anyone know why describe-map and describe-map-tree currently > inserts its result into buffer instead of just returning a string? That's what they always did. It's also more efficient. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Stefan Kangas Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160408102311776 (code B ref 39149); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2020 18:03:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59629 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYYkZ-00033s-5m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:03:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com ([209.85.221.48]:35049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYYkW-00033e-U3 for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:03:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id n15so7462622wrq.2 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=RYq2FhHbF3dvcRV9V77KnOGMF6BrwX1S+OZFQ15sUlA=; b=KsXhsJCN3o1JB7u6iy1le2ng9y7Fwo/jnAy6IOwkhZpNBi/uKAXve4Tx0aA41wAxc8 sTw+EAb3B6UZe6fIvKDUCWBfoFM9zU3OBbu+SQtFcu7M2vsdZavPvzrt1iOhuliAgC7U NDNON+pCVpaZl8ChT9khbCpqVPJJLSftKc1EBbihj/Y8VthIYe2cyD0myqsiHFnECZqB 0dGogjRWtzSasnqaUu+znVaZdeiyjbm7qYliDaamD/x/K/wIUx1F5QaxqjBQM3akvy7Q e5Y3H7OvQyqcJFmGnQuGbGb2t0dvZSJCicrJjnTUL5TuRKPpBMw3lSSlGUOIXy9TusUV vHig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=RYq2FhHbF3dvcRV9V77KnOGMF6BrwX1S+OZFQ15sUlA=; b=sgppElL/9ls9Tab6/N6bttajOwVhH7talguD/nq9bL6tH44hYPK6rGzTACgq8JI3S5 NKPwY3nEGvUOeiWsWTzSaNVar8hM6tf8xCyAR9GiZnqUCoWkKzvMrw8QCSOLyPlWKdhX KDd70h1iz2eqTjE2yN7q++lo+EdWeJHqAwpd1fbucV67lHhbkJXO6e7Oyv7Unv2pAYqY mdB3UFNIoUUZ2sat/37yWg2SIghAYDHfelo+bl1Z/t8NQPJD1PdzWrzdQmYj6bCN0ktZ XGKD/MRrlqMcq1uEIIom77bHGSeYIrGy+splnneTyKRGzZSzjSBmMbxtDQhgBoSLETBd Rzhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332Fxqck3F5Q3ZLKjcTmExdQzHOczXODUL8uqVYKHPZlMzcjDl6 IQ7/0Pyf1f+IDYT0HzNJjVxFRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMcvlCK4RrRQnNrQkFmawnl1OG4Tp1tJlDzUZdjF372wAV7POJwU0Ij6FLcnz53Y3ridYfwQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:40d2:: with SMTP id b18mr4768560wrq.155.1604081015020; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:03:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:92bd:1bfd:38fc:fae2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 24sm5272060wmf.44.2020.10.30.11.03.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:03:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:03:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:16:35 +0000") Message-ID: <871rhflhfv.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > Note that there might have been changes here with the merge of > scratch/substitute-command-keys. I tried hard to not introduce any > regressions or even changes in behavior with that branch, but I might > have failed to include the above bug... > > What is the result output here? Here, the last form evaluates to this > on master: > > " > Global Bindings Starting With C-c C-l: > key binding > --- ------- > > > Function key map translations Starting With C-c C-l: > key binding > --- ------- > > " FWIW, emacs-27 and master behave differently in this respect; see e.g. https://github.com/abo-abo/swiper/issues/2709. The headings used to be inserted in the current buffer along with the bindings, but the headings alone are now printed to standard-output instead. Is that a problem? Thanks, -- Basil From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 04:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , yyoncho Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160420508112844 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 04:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2020 04:31:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZ51V-0003L5-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 00:31:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]:45218) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZ51T-0003Ks-90 for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 00:31:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id dg9so10705339edb.12 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 21:31:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hu8kiB5dBgQQRO8KTcTAlwak2krmjF3VqaAXbtEiPxo=; b=rkZX2eSl7U1k8UJxRdVHIU9Wsl0dLJUe8LAHdIvmfzuICj2z3InBkzG3UWbLduxGR4 qED6weDPOWC/AMlr66oNcZSTybK9pmP1DJHg/uoCPS06IXo7TxSqg4BSIehFnWI+qrzz /iaQimFXErr+94gNg3FgwE0gsoqxGK2LkJibwLcetSzwnHI7BnQV06K81vZ2K0mf34Xk YSckszin90lte0a/ZR+AoEGay7wDJ0qjVrdkYFj0jsMMkrrgzhbIABmBufLKWAG15b1V 2dSo4nmfGufzADL/aIo7D2qzDiAXNs2b9RXQ+ixC+XmeG/6sVWNnPBTxHPxlfSd0JHVl HnCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hu8kiB5dBgQQRO8KTcTAlwak2krmjF3VqaAXbtEiPxo=; b=Zxzb0XmM2JcEHSoNYjuJGfzh8TDj+kiHQX6m7M2w6E1g09BAKKSJQTMySuHxXYx6g+ 520fZVsna/4u061FIKitNCra5SVibH+OPi0NfPZRkoPCA9z2NdBt3f6RC+Ggfu7tC3zD qGyvvj8/yGpvpawEK4QR3OQSw/BYiv4JT4ISxlq2vKKIYviVdhgotR+XxQX24j/Dtj31 wY+bw7Xa1uvH4bq0kkBrZPsg11MoV9uk5viaMRMRlwvfpw7AujXiGdDshEtYSwi9TOkK XNot/e8J7RcJ31okfehdaBB+fmLtpvVrznu/hgDklJYGqwRl4MkZHKtcP9BL6O4E5MjL FCIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/NCd9gFT/+fUrP6iC2IUAVGySqNgNjnX8cOBGrxaem/a6+mWa yql6rM1wN5CYDSCUCPaJyRY76xcgj/Q6tyo4siU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwd9a+iQ8WZZ7NJ1E5cbX0J1wQb2ipPj2rQ231xYT7zMPHe7PT3ZjBENpymoAYdL674ibv7TCyAsGwI/bTizJw= X-Received: by 2002:a50:9f61:: with SMTP id b88mr220916edf.282.1604205073441; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 21:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 21:31:12 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 21:31:12 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: >>> To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) >>> (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") >>> `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer >>> :filter ,(lambda (cmd) >>> (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) >>> cmd))) >>> (with-temp-buffer >>> (with-output-to-string >>> (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) >>> >>> This outputs: >>> >>> \"Called in *temp*\" >> >> I tried this recipe, but I'm not getting the :filter function called at >> all. Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that reproduces >> this bug? > > I can reproduce the above on Emacs 26.3, but not on master. This change in behavior was caused by this commit: commit 8a1441310aa151e739cfed3bd2eff3358edc8001 Author: Stefan Kangas Date: Sun Oct 18 15:32:22 2020 +0200 Prefer Lisp version of describe-map-tree So as suspected, there is a difference in behavior between the new Lisp version of describe-map-tree and the new C version. From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 14:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16042425873801 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 14:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2020 14:56:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZEmR-0000zF-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:56:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:46671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZEmO-0000z7-00 for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:56:24 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id w13so1582714eju.13 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 06:56:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KHctgnqI491yWxV+4Kz+ZHqT1H9Iq1cE4CfJHRs9ppY=; b=LWMxDv7G2wfibTRWre9aaNInXYLnm0KHF10GzmAnxi4T3kXY/6qS+3Fxv5aDCbQPTb VjvHCmi9NqMj5eicoxtgKGva/bG9Y9Ig/dLlFBTiLrf1230nrUcjQGi11HibTQgoWlsn anDtumRFgqNihdkig5Zk6ZaWsDSp3OuT9NboCxsWdThwihqF24XFY/DyDo9cSiVaQUZ3 CP945VisSQmbifqIEg7UkdZWfttSREjw2Qwjl8I1JOXTeesPMIcf22XUOHOsH4Ux3aYq AfOYaB5xaOV7LzgKqjXtkf4AdHzuUZpCIh7/24eSuCVcIKuVEamo0kikZp8BurT6MFym sBEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KHctgnqI491yWxV+4Kz+ZHqT1H9Iq1cE4CfJHRs9ppY=; b=VwNcSv86KNhD+YZNVCLSEIY5bHFufHprYi6/qb4USn3zVN9crheLq9kxZqRRT4LMXB kiOwAsaq4VXRvXzMTKUlKW/K4i+8yVMiMBISIsvxz8ZkU7aMZbwrrZDHcb9h1b06GZQt QY9mRC7aTR0t/NAvSc9R2xlaEQyCI6R2cYC+XIIHU/HTVGPbH2aHlo0jf1dKzbiWI9l9 WkKyt06YaiQi0UnPJs0BG17Iy7b1/vgXqeA7vwV+QSrqFOhXxPgiduc+rZKg3RLgaz8+ aeE7OymWt1i7sEA6kd1re9t/2IvX/0BSbQqRYutCO7f7sKj8PqowbVs28pwbBKkGitkw hZBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AuK1EpU1650RVwlzwzs6OnG6h9IfOItiV6JhRU8liEDZXS1wE 9jRrCtstgYPo/QM8F/qs68hbV6vKSn6iPKeERSQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/4NI18inBvJ9z4T8TB37UNgZfERrLSy+BZKLlBMAtfiLI9Ong9VVV+Y3nwkY2oKfNLwgS54J296Dq4QZgXYs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8058:: with SMTP id x24mr11673551ejw.272.1604242578088; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 06:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 06:56:17 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <871rhflhfv.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <871rhflhfv.fsf@tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 06:56:17 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > FWIW, emacs-27 and master behave differently in this respect; > see e.g. https://github.com/abo-abo/swiper/issues/2709. > > The headings used to be inserted in the current buffer along with the > bindings, but the headings alone are now printed to standard-output > instead. > > Is that a problem? Yes, it is a bug. I have pushed a fix to master. Could you please test that it works for you? (The fix should mean that you don't have to bind `standard-output' in swiper.) From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16042501198189 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2020 17:01:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZGju-000281-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 12:01:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:46655) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZGjs-00027n-TL for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 12:01:57 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id k10so10522305wrw.13 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:01:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=zVLjjqeKEXl6LMiP/y9E+32290/UWer5DJ3OR++nEog=; b=D/PPfX5hVgYNrSt5viCPToQf9tXCIBFpa1X/T5UfjOBz3YtN59SaEbhnURyF0gB+u4 T1GfvKy/rRRoX2vmMxXCPCa1oQXq/AIZ0Q9fUApTXENhIGE6r0yw/uhW0sT5Wrj1VrDP m7vVY4UEXjmpLA6+b04sX0lv7Er0wTfV9IBBen6YdLKP6gS25BWznFWDtHEmmWrfgyE8 vVf+ePAPtii/6vbzPTVC3Mxh/gD8d/IIZ1mm2jEaxBVJrdcmovSegmDb3WYIt7X3L8Qd bWRtoTIwpEwjk6fcHaMRvxummEAJKl6pwz6BUrIiSjvCPqk6ON1hruDNtaW3IQllKoXs BqOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=zVLjjqeKEXl6LMiP/y9E+32290/UWer5DJ3OR++nEog=; b=EV+v3bSinb9QZFb24uiWeTCrRGvvHREJUnNeb3kvZfGn0p3/gDhLBpcm8Otj8VPjn2 CMy0EToLNJk7J9Tukw6ZJyWC0aGnJO3/qg7Cn+SW2cO+0WfZD8NEBkhdBLdGu+XoBIce ezX9VRnUv2nsdoxUZZ/hQFuoZeHYiA/jdy9Hbz8sW+Mc1dx6dSMDkOFfZDiznNAO2ikS x9G3eGXx0xyN/QMkKs3VEungXHruclJAP7cdtPeHKjsULtpNFEMSPg5RAwXIFjBgqI52 YVat1OQUC97D/lIH1RaffOJzAQ0MjmfhQFWoF6BKhpldV/RLdV+WxOcTPpZ61gjP/0Pb P22w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FQxyjxZ/XB9f2QoF3LTu8pPNa85RrpGNPJJDi1cZcBad3MINd 8+og/w2wjwVOqPAs8DMvDIcnUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw12Q6zxY8IMDWMoJvpoBDfy3U862ZubiFFc+OIQD1z6NRi4vAx5jZb3tUJGtiU6vYzjBX48g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:66c9:: with SMTP id k9mr16784019wrw.158.1604250110972; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([51.37.36.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b2sm8491158wmd.40.2020.11.01.09.01.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:01:50 -0800 (PST) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <871rhflhfv.fsf@tcd.ie> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:01:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sun, 1 Nov 2020 06:56:17 -0800") Message-ID: <87wnz5c8oy.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > >> FWIW, emacs-27 and master behave differently in this respect; >> see e.g. https://github.com/abo-abo/swiper/issues/2709. >> >> The headings used to be inserted in the current buffer along with the >> bindings, but the headings alone are now printed to standard-output >> instead. >> >> Is that a problem? > > Yes, it is a bug. I have pushed a fix to master. Could you please test > that it works for you? Thanks, it does. > (The fix should mean that you don't have to bind `standard-output' in > swiper.) Done. -- Basil From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 00:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , yyoncho Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16053998569006 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 00:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2020 00:24:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ke5q3-0002LC-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:24:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:43010) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ke5q1-0002Ky-QG for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:24:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id me8so19261801ejb.10 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FjhL5W8baXKbyjHGRCyfE/ON/PnwzJGoJ3jHsEDCiro=; b=qMd1wNERPyvcHv918HLqdwdl7fkRZSD/hAdx2Zw60RNwOWFfEJEJ1PXIkrAETdUTEn UzsfQTFhRapAx0bs4vCvO5ZIHA18VZEcmsCM7u6fHGUbm1n1EGVa7HBogOenpPwG8vrJ jOK0p2khBGFEwj+sIe5FS3tH4Jt77NnpjGOIiRxdQ4ih4V3pkGDAcAUsDxjmlc7XtLZf N+g42jj2fqCuhvgX4HpfAx5hN1qnmtrKB6mwGXkOJD68lYbu1Lfzk/aXn3kZHBmgsEtX 74XjqpztVOFgzsJtuLkudY2ci0ZjnxHki7dlmKVHVinfEBOREE7EP6OxYGhsWy1ivRRh Yn7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FjhL5W8baXKbyjHGRCyfE/ON/PnwzJGoJ3jHsEDCiro=; b=nfWnFj+Li/S6CGDNn2W/E/YrxFxqBdH/d2GSnQsZE3heWcyeEX9A0E+GDz426ctZw8 7pTwT2IQoNVJ80bJBx8VhkyQjrNUXOG+kX1n3p0EznQtfePvbY6cPDcapnTzT2KLDT+u nIxzdpXYwO86uF0wxi8G4h1ImUn59XaCmO3fp4ZjC3t5pPqwJiKLy1otAMPPSajOHbPE mpuL76zEP6SDHmlST1akPzYuKkO0IAHfq/nxUCa+qjgyat0rysOnZk1Uz8ZhlyWBNHKQ Yq09621cXCb26SkW+Qqd+Zcf8TYjeY/eqAeZEycT7MsI6yKqQ0w0yegYsM9TNYNlCrPl 0IqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YPgwOanzy/+5qmt5IvraA3tZCwby5tTZYCHtfrBC7fiZWpRnb vMGb1JsvnTf7ySMC2CfW9idr0Q4D1vBsKrfAfHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynDipTzRAWxE386i25N7IVrsdFJvKV/sJ0wxAQ129DHsAptSQ2DlneAaLJ3lABZtl/nN76bexLL+oY32jw1vs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce24:: with SMTP id sd4mr8323990ejb.432.1605399847776; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > yyoncho writes: > >> To reproduce (eval in scratch buffer) >> (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") >> `(menu-item "2" switch-to-buffer >> :filter ,(lambda (cmd) >> (print (format "Called in %s" (current-buffer))) >> cmd))) >> (with-temp-buffer >> (with-output-to-string >> (describe-buffer-bindings (get-buffer "*scratch*") [3 12] t))) >> >> This outputs: >> >> \"Called in *temp*\" > > I tried this recipe, but I'm not getting the :filter function called at > all. Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that reproduces > this bug? I have pushed a fix to master (f08e6538dc) ensuring that we correctly run the :filter function. The bug can now be reproduced (on master and 26.3) using: (progn (require 'ert) (let (was-in-buffer) (unwind-protect (progn (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") `(menu-item "2" identity :filter ,(lambda (cmd) (setq was-in-buffer (current-buffer)) cmd))) (with-temp-buffer (let ((buf (get-buffer "*scratch*"))) (describe-buffer-bindings buf nil t) (should was-in-buffer) (should (eq was-in-buffer buf))))) (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l r") nil) (define-key global-map (kbd "C-c C-l") nil)))) As Andreas Schwab has pointed out, the problem is that describe-map (and describe_map before it) has no idea about the buffer argument to describe-bindings. So if the above is to be made to work, we have to make sure that it does. I see two ways of doing that: a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure that the :filter function is run there. b) Change describe-map to return its output as a string. The problem with a) is that describe-map already has a pretty long argument list. It also seems to me that the resulting code would not be very easy to follow. My preference would therefore be looking into option b) first. If we can make it work, we could then just change the buffer in describe-buffer-bindings before calling describe-map. (It is true that the old C function "describe_map" has always inserted its output in the current buffer. It also true that it has always been an internal function, and never exposed to Lisp directly. So we should be free to change its behavior, and we should probably better do it before Emacs 28.1.) Thoughts? --- Also, a tangent: IMHO, using `menu-item' in this way works as it stands, but it is a bit strange conceptually. We are binding a key to a `menu-item' that is never intended to be used for a menu. Yet IIUC this is the recommended way of using :filter. It would perhaps be better to have a specific format that allows for these extended features, without needing to provide a `menu-item'. (See `(elisp) Format of Keymaps' for more.) From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Stefan Kangas Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho@gmail.com Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160545337420791 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2020 15:16:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keJlF-0005PH-TY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34924) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keJlE-0005P5-Dd for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keJl9-0006tl-03; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:07 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1864 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1keJl8-0007Cl-C0; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 10:16:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:15:57 +0200 Message-Id: <83k0umtzv6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800) References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800 > Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org > > a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure > that the :filter function is run there. > > b) Change describe-map to return its output as a string. Unless I'm missing something, b) would be a backward-incompatible change, so I don't think we should consider it. If adding an argument is deemed not a good idea, how about binding a special variable to convey that information to describe-buffer-bindings? From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho@gmail.com Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160545650725616 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2020 16:08:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKZn-0006f6-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:08:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]:38348) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKZk-0006er-FJ for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:08:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id y4so10362253edy.5 for <39149@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kXdJ62GmWvNW0/csyfG+3AFgo/X7Jl9VoY/vBgiOOyQ=; b=PkD30xu7kOC/CqIO0lhsCBq46J3i2u5h/zBJQvgGl2EtAWMhBNnMgfpli+cnkXNnow utPU4+c+sYIec6YMZ1hBsA31Izw1jg0ThkzqjQdU8lNWxAetUSkkNp403yVB1IOoRlu7 kX4UziARrR4nsjJyO+MRbw8or1fR1wItOkhAFgfafNx+8LGL7nh9v+PmvLPk3MmHkPDD dlRWl+WbhgrUE1q6RPMVIOtaM0OMVoxhiVD0Bgp0p65MQs1a01NqeJH6wV5nGSF1qRsy AWQfdPllpZYglu9jRe5vD1BkD+SH/zGH7m2qq7HEd3Yt395AOP999tfZxT775un4KHy5 /bMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kXdJ62GmWvNW0/csyfG+3AFgo/X7Jl9VoY/vBgiOOyQ=; b=p3PVGViEwUwfqNsPNjwlFTq1sQLJqoLPAWV++4F9WylaBbGo/z1imvLlK217rdTMq3 DXlvDNEYwKDFt/mqZ+lQ+81sH/8oHA4cbKgtqnL0mv5Y9C1XfdDKHLcR1Hrs/06+ParD V9S4y65gAXb4viusG35dJBG2evcn+i/H44rfIR3MCLdc6QXwXVuzS6oMzvzxA3eM3j/e r2T12+qvD0Ex65YK2YLculXacIgrBa7Om5D44ecQ0mo9TbXKn4Ev9MUJtEpgjsosFdM8 xGR5/jyO2uOWKd8Q7uYgB0x3sEnVkmT/RFbZAEjww41imz4MRAXxf3izfjs3d9vAwegJ SgWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yDePipkhGtqsWI+l3JA1km6pjLPoa/sW6SZgZDjAXpQNF8wAp dmgbPRNckpbWTYH8mq3Mb+MhZnArieq25Va2j/k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1WKW9FDdtVFZVzR6vU13DqVDguFzA4IBRu7AbZpsqW61khaaHlGliJjylez0qjvIz6m8vLVLfoapOikU6g1E= X-Received: by 2002:a50:e443:: with SMTP id e3mr12316040edm.160.1605456498677; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83k0umtzv6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0umtzv6.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Kangas >> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800 >> Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure >> that the :filter function is run there. >> >> b) Change describe-map to return its output as a string. > > Unless I'm missing something, b) would be a backward-incompatible > change, so I don't think we should consider it. No: `describe-map' was added on master a month ago as a Lisp translation of the old C function "describe_map". It has never been exposed to Lisp directly, but was used internally on the C level by `substitute-command-keys' and `describe-buffer-bindings'. What is true is that: - `substitute-command-keys' has always returned a string. - `describe-buffer-bindings' has always inserted into the current buffer. Whether we go with option a) or b) shouldn't need to change that. So we should think carefully about what their interface should be rather than nail it down to match the old C code. BTW, while we're on it, I'm not at all sure it would make sense to use these functions outside of help.el. I think we might want to consider renaming `describe-map' to `help--describe-map', and similarly for `describe-map-tree'. > If adding an argument is deemed not a good idea, how about binding a > special variable to convey that information to > describe-buffer-bindings? Yes, that could be a third option c). Personally, I like option b) better. From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Stefan Kangas Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho@gmail.com Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160545773927404 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2020 16:28:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtf-00077w-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtb-00077g-VG for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:58 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtV-0006W3-Vd; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:50 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2518 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtU-0005OB-BG; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:49 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:28:38 +0200 Message-Id: <83ima6twi1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800) References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0umtzv6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, yyoncho@gmail.com, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If adding an argument is deemed not a good idea, how about binding a > > special variable to convey that information to > > describe-buffer-bindings? > > Yes, that could be a third option c). Personally, I like option b) > better. If we need to insert stuff into a buffer, why make it a string and then insert? why not insert directly? The latter means less consing, so less GC. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 14 12:14:35 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2020 17:14:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1korQg-00083q-Q5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:14:34 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45270) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1korQe-00083Z-VP for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:14:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gJ1lkamfkbXwUejqqGg11mH4o2fJP1mkWkE6pZBPVvI=; b=HsGsUFb8Cfsb2WX1olQQ7yLOlB DQXrUQ/ex8nhFtz8/BluDrTn0h5qzQOcvXnNf/Fvh+dUxY4ZAb/1+1z4L1b7u+nK15TfymgsrSEZU h6a1QFDrsAZT2nS341ZDSuuaNDB+FGIJnofORN7stOTQEgR8sNuvIlzw+jKHCVGgh3yM=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1korQX-0004yj-H6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:14:27 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:14:24 +0100 Message-Id: <874kkoz4wf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #39149 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 39149 - moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 39149 - moreinfo quit From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.165020985221835 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2022 15:37:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng6xw-0005g6-1v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 11:37:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng6xu-0005fp-Jx for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 11:37:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qO6LhfpOmiGCZL1Za6GwXLtASKBRbvsyZxoJVlLsVFE=; b=MP319ZpQvLipVHSQWQzykWrvfu l9JDc62ZjQVcFNDJB4pl6wzQBRalRkciP1JFc6UEhcNHHSWIWN2DD6hcvp9FihejueIlthGisUT3r wCPHVhGB7e6atGrdRz7ybkb0FcXtR6YWkCxos2t68hZqmpwlhOn54T+jWSao8qnll+aU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ng6xj-0006yz-RZ; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:37:23 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:37:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:24:07 -0800") Message-ID: <87sfqb7mc2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > I see two ways of doing that: > > a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure > that the :filter function is run there. I've now done this in Emacs 29. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > I see two ways of doing that: > > a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure > that the :filter function is run there. I've now done this in Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 17 11:37:39 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2022 15:37:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng6y3-0005gT-8p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 11:37:39 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng6y1-0005gD-JZ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 11:37:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/Q7/OgigGOTKIf5yakZMGh24fzpCYEroEaYuwRQKFlA=; b=usZmp9hQav1PG+1k+NdBXnLmqA hjK9JR33xF2gYac87BJzyOgGxRmFT+cL9zaV4jtL/9X+uWycn62KTayuBL9wu3jQTeJBSGEgO6FF3 RmgDTWQ8IwbQxofqyiPDwvLTLkpYFMIY0B0rWPdPxFg/yS6IAq/3Zbhvm/x8pnqaWE80=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ng6xt-0006zF-1G for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:37:31 +0200 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:37:26 +0200 Message-Id: <87r15v7mbt.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #39149 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 39149 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 39149 29.1 quit From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, yyoncho@gmail.com Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.1650211355471 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2022 16:02:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7MA-00007X-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:02:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7M6-000071-AI for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:02:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7M0-0005aw-SD; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:02:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=iJbfGlWjBC67IlDxC8fDzT2G8D6fgU+XDcMP5+bNHI8=; b=LQT0Y0hYWKNK 2Oy3mzeLMBaKXJ0YZEyRRHE5nH496tSg8wDHZO4zZ//XwYaBJR8cVf/Qpma/+/NJpP2lNj1MAxPO6 yeeeFHscSnHhIUGw97Vt1kvAqbS+ggNajq9KWAevKzD+lXp+DogNGilxs/jxp/AvHlySngT5opHJe r6Z55rYJ7U2sAYBkv/sI41rRcLi5lOY7Mvm1PHtIRKjzspFUF1E5WlOzyZjjoKsaVBTwpfgXfwNis W0HAKfFhvS8HE3OK++60kTkdXywVReNGUg5XzAWGeWjYf9Kis7IYq7/fLoHDnnxT/kYUDDtWQRY6e BecuudAO/qn9Lef9mRvSIA==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2206 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7M0-0008Nu-Br; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:02:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:02:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83ilr7y9z1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87sfqb7mc2.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:37:17 +0200) References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfqb7mc2.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:37:17 +0200 > Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho > > Stefan Kangas writes: > > > I see two ways of doing that: > > > > a) Add a new argument to describe-map with the original buffer. Ensure > > that the :filter function is run there. > > I've now done this in Emacs 29. But you didn't push, did you? From unknown Fri Jun 13 16:55:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, yyoncho@gmail.com Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.16502116281004 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2022 16:07:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7QZ-0000G5-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:07:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7QW-0000FV-S8 for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:07:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=j7vqKcTjrUocBwgmoI9sfpZxFLDy1ZZbmfvYMefRe+k=; b=Oy0J1EzCGo+/hLfz5gJeDnRXNt f9Qfw/z2zuzptZDtuPTwp7APyCMVUxCM8Z3SEf61QMSBvzaxb2EYfxUBL2KtS3SqdcF0X1d/igQyG sNLiVTnIuYH2yg/rfR5ddKAI4wmcO8Ghkk8zA5kP59l6tPmjpBObHMckQPD+wA+vbth0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ng7QK-0007K5-CP; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:06:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfqb7mc2.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilr7y9z1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:06:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83ilr7y9z1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:02:10 +0300") Message-ID: <87ilr77kys.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > But you didn't push, did you? 'course not. =?UTF-8?Q?=F0=9F=AB=A0?= Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > But you didn't push, did you? 'course not. =F0=9F=AB=A0 --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no