From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:16:03 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#39084 <39084@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#39084 <39084@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt Reply-To: bug#39084 <39084@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:16:03 +0000 retitle 39084 Two `tm.tm_yday >=3D 119` tests fail while building neomutt reassign 39084 guix submitter 39084 Wiktor =C5=BBelazny severity 39084 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 11 05:40:16 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2020 10:40:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqEBk-0007VA-KU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:40:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqEBj-0007V3-EE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:40:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33887) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqEBi-0003nA-8L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:40:15 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqEBg-0005H4-03 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:40:14 -0500 Received: from freeshell.de ([2a01:360:106::2]:39174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqEBf-0004zN-N5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:40:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 11:40:06 +0100 From: Wiktor =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBelazny?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt Message-ID: <20200111104006.wbtmmy6ucomqztx4@wz.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="id2ymq7cs7k7cvmx" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: https://freeshell.de/~wz/pubkey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: BDC9 74CD D9C9 BA7D 761A 573D C735 A8C6 AB60 79D5 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a01:360:106::2 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --id2ymq7cs7k7cvmx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi list, A few days ago, I=E2=80=99ve started getting this while trying to upgrade neomutt: Test test_mutt_date_gmtime... [ FAILED ] Case Today: mutt_date_gmtime.c:59: Check tm.tm_yday >=3D 119... failed and Test test_mutt_date_localtime... [ FAILED ] Case Today: mutt_date_localtime.c:61: Check tm.tm_yday >=3D 119... failed I tried searching on-line for this error string to get some idea what may be going on, but to no avail. W=C5=BB --id2ymq7cs7k7cvmx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEvcl0zdnJun12Glc9xzWoxqtgedUFAl4ZpgVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJE Qzk3NENERDlDOUJBN0Q3NjFBNTczREM3MzVBOEM2QUI2MDc5RDUACgkQxzWoxqtg edV0BQ/+I6vRsgrvA6YHWa8ynGkFwAunqQHQsndeGl/DqBhVZwZUe21uKGumDzip hPTMhIHFFDVKw2Dxty2Z/MipYtxSLb09+v17VfOpITvNIcx7eYnIiQjVECyHVCIU qVshze+1JHaNfoBXKazUq0R7dEQHTVAhaRAu3KYCIOteLdvnSjOEHelawR6dskRa UZXi3BQv8uLbu+d6pO9hnXFwBC+iv9XfkVIJkDg0nDyJuAeoAaXcrmwIvGRl5uq5 e/ow1NgyKlgcmvfrgzBvTGNxznmyd2rQIWMv+iU1VP7kt1kqyJkY1AQ1uelmbkbR OV12Pg9heYvf+jO5S57URy+mG13ZzUg0jFYei9poiDNYHB9R2pTKih+bHn4I0toV ZA72nO3vXta+O4vyNchapxSCNFA3Sd/YilOZG8ssZejIMwuqKJwkrc35KaJG/Qvs nYbJlvoNdLgU+CyAN9O+BbMu6ouPjFrHJS6N9qy3f3po/7QmfXpirUT0lPs9gGqT StyZ/APMXcLdv8Ok05NLlLsXt2oX+GDDfjgOFDzOCXJGeR0IRs4BNaAjsfIQUeDE lCqva3fxZgwOPnk57mRWfPGzcUosBCm0jMni5Hchsg6xJtX4bDlxSns8dhxmJfOW /+wfhostZoZ9WKxU+XbtGnrOl6F9LAwutOcaOvtu+zHZHEnPLCA= =9WJa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --id2ymq7cs7k7cvmx-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 29 06:47:26 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2020 11:47:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33294 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwloc-0003Qo-B8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:47:26 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwloa-0003Qg-AE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:47:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwloZ-0002P8-As for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:47:24 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwloW-0000vY-Sv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:47:21 -0500 Received: from freeshell.de ([2a01:360:106::2]:53372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwloW-0000rY-MY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:47:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:47:06 +0100 From: Wiktor =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBelazny?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt Message-ID: <20200129114706.wpde6nnmy7gfv4vg@wzguix> Mail-Followup-To: bug-guix@gnu.org X-PGP-Key: https://freeshell.de/~wz/pubkey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: BDC9 74CD D9C9 BA7D 761A 573D C735 A8C6 AB60 79D5 References: <20200111104006.wbtmmy6ucomqztx4@wz.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h7vbew5gqdvcrpxz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200111104006.wbtmmy6ucomqztx4@wz.localdomain> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a01:360:106::2 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) --h7vbew5gqdvcrpxz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Wiktor =C5=BBelazny wrote: > A few days ago, I=E2=80=99ve started getting this while trying to upgrade > neomutt: > > Test test_mutt_date_gmtime... [ FAILED ] > Case Today: > mutt_date_gmtime.c:59: Check tm.tm_yday >=3D 119... failed > > and > > Test test_mutt_date_localtime... [ FAILED ] > Case Today: > mutt_date_localtime.c:61: Check tm.tm_yday >=3D 119... failed The problem is gone now. W=C5=BB --h7vbew5gqdvcrpxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEvcl0zdnJun12Glc9xzWoxqtgedUFAl4xcLpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJE Qzk3NENERDlDOUJBN0Q3NjFBNTczREM3MzVBOEM2QUI2MDc5RDUACgkQxzWoxqtg edUe0Q//cue9T51qwp1E7CTdE6O80KThHDamPnGAqXgEnScV3n7EP8WiwtJp+rAg u0C4y82zWtLtjabfP3Q1y6vMN/WpU+SWmb5toLyn0QAuxd9viZbJYliKByOGuip1 o9XRIDuOH39VFHhlaF3oiwEyvmODqrXrpqaVkgBk+xHeIkh+V+Vs4ddkR57r4+Hv Y757GZ4K8GB47NhPs18qS7PfzEnFMZtB+ovfJ+xqt3Pp4wwiQtSGcp4PK87DtvQa x9XyICckYYvKIZbR8nCZvYlB8xxeBubTcyqzfeUVqFazoocAun5j6/E3bD5Okwl9 HR7Gg/0bqqh8uarWgIE1IXdb4T1cxqSHwZYvPPPq8McWMHj5kLbFRWdyaoPkZYbo SKHwMbQ21BvdXCh+AssFQtmXAC9O5OjQlJNOijgRQzutlygXxmvBnogbz8db3Ujm pCv9FZjUCiOG9r/FnOdYCgOUIkzZlafcyvYW/hH+3LlHsccrIhzm4Xuq5T70nUXf 0InreM3Ri2WCH0Vt3zGVzKnVzfRzMy/GP6k1gdLwV5j7OHQOdARuXdRq69jKxOKZ dWHTtYJauY7LYYnOFp68vf1tSmiQOMYqsohrrwrH9iq+0GwupBtm1MwqEVA0fSlV XUKl1sDuRQb21rLo7Y5XqF7c9QgVEE8KrMdvtToBVVrhUpt/XNs= =ap+z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h7vbew5gqdvcrpxz-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 29 16:02:46 2020 Received: (at 39084-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2020 21:02:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwuU1-0008Im-Tm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:46 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:53215) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwuU0-0008IY-2L for 39084-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:44 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A25623; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=NDq4jb0v+egeDnE49CKag8XK YgM3A6v2tKNaDHjNToU=; b=1w5n5jq5QtNADMf0hzTEPoZT0HiKQmlhJQRLYDZx dAjhsKYFePnVdYyfHMjvjog2ACwWxT31sEiKcU35AWJLwelkyNT1kj0oOO6sAqqa XS5aAptbZixBvDj++mLemKMwje9ilZkVwRCf3Y6DPXq7zph3JnaX+rrSjiZ5Sst8 808= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NDq4jb 0v+egeDnE49CKag8XKYgM3A6v2tKNaDHjNToU=; b=m6Ul9NzSo8DoH6n4kVyAsE dET0L8RxSe1pcHM7OGhvPbx9Cpz9wiyaG2ePK0pUdf+eg+xttqdaFN11riBYf+sK 19ALRGIHbjdhzC40+PQNhumcPs//nz3dmCt+2un6uA1gnNLpDbILofsiDvdzgzz0 juJOjgcVeMVDMDmCxAqena9lNh0ul2OZAmqd8eVkbMw/G3tLfEmYi3BBa8YlHwnL NfP1AUwEocL3BypiUQNF/dQ3tAvpWAQx7k85pIIZtCAzO9yHFkI5hwNtLuyS/F3+ hCi686OP/ttzJtMUSD1aqxCS2vuA6UgZP49haTt2bHLcWES/1BitAXhx2J1Ppo7A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrfeeigddugedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecukfhppeeikedrkedurdeikedrudelleenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdr nhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-68-81-68-199.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [68.81.68.199]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 42CB1328005D for <39084-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:34 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: 39084-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#39084: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt Message-ID: <20200129210234.GA21732@jasmine.lan> References: <20200111104006.wbtmmy6ucomqztx4@wz.localdomain> <20200129114706.wpde6nnmy7gfv4vg@wzguix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200129114706.wpde6nnmy7gfv4vg@wzguix> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39084-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:47:06PM +0100, Wiktor =C5=BBelazny wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Wiktor =C5=BBelazny wrote: >=20 > > A few days ago, I=E2=80=99ve started getting this while trying to upgra= de > > neomutt: > > > > Test test_mutt_date_gmtime... [ FAILED ] > > Case Today: > > mutt_date_gmtime.c:59: Check tm.tm_yday >=3D 119... failed > > > > and > > > > Test test_mutt_date_localtime... [ FAILED ] > > Case Today: > > mutt_date_localtime.c:61: Check tm.tm_yday >=3D 119... failed >=20 > The problem is gone now. Okay, closing :) --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl4x8uYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjcRxAAsyQM1aU7Ok1s7Xqbi87M6oyy9vR3tNYonJMq5hLn2BFqtajnFMD+yOgG 97rgjEiOJljojZHGHcoJYp9D9woB5YTX2UimWNvcIwOun1+zwGlY/DYja8z8df+m VjIqJbFbG6khKHQGuvCY7XK0N1gdxCEv50YTF80DkBivrCTpLihus64nL3FjLu8L XNsS/Po1pG9gf2UaAbWw9VryHVgPbmeYMoyg8gXarPIOofPN7H3/JMAP5HOViLdH Jr/LI+CAXF9wEiogGY/He+lRj7G9ROFjgVV6+tLhRVZyp55k/S6o6lB093gJPKH7 i6C4mqQXgXHP62f7IAfna2v4g2x98X0QxJaZ/zUob8a8avQw3/RgiQMV7Rz+EgqV RQPG6e63X+SOQ5kadm7TvqGFPaGeJH5M7wAl1wovawHEUOyxcMoOjpPvMtLWFbPB jAMgqfA7R1YN+a29OCBd0UY9mt09lj4IJRwYWDW6sLuMr9nHWAFN5mRm52vuAW1r PMwU7TV8CaM3fuhZoRCMZ7LB6Ma8MCHlApdrhWMA6Q3rCvdlpCIOOyAvnSopP+lw wbzB7ECkGnd2EVcpDpXLsDOnB7iak8GguzJNFIqAAgxn+dJHFBj9R0RJjn54gTcq QvczzcGqSLz9LFAIRkamOU0EJrlkkvW1/OplvpTOp4h0+CX1gDQ= =kqf3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:16:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator