GNU bug report logs - #39084
Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Wiktor Żelazny <wz <at> freeshell.de>

Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:41:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39084 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39084 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#39084; Package guix. (Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:41:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Wiktor Żelazny <wz <at> freeshell.de>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:41:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wiktor Żelazny <wz <at> freeshell.de>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 11:40:06 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi list,

A few days ago, I’ve started getting this while trying to upgrade
neomutt:

   Test test_mutt_date_gmtime...                   [ FAILED ]
     Case Today:
       mutt_date_gmtime.c:59: Check tm.tm_yday >= 119... failed

and

   Test test_mutt_date_localtime...                [ FAILED ]
     Case Today:
       mutt_date_localtime.c:61: Check tm.tm_yday >= 119... failed

I tried searching on-line for this error string to get some idea what
may be going on, but to no avail.

WŻ
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#39084; Package guix. (Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:48:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wiktor Żelazny <wz <at> freeshell.de>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building neomutt
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:47:06 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Wiktor Żelazny wrote:

> A few days ago, I’ve started getting this while trying to upgrade
> neomutt:
>
>    Test test_mutt_date_gmtime...                   [ FAILED ]
>      Case Today:
>        mutt_date_gmtime.c:59: Check tm.tm_yday >= 119... failed
>
> and
>
>    Test test_mutt_date_localtime...                [ FAILED ]
>      Case Today:
>        mutt_date_localtime.c:61: Check tm.tm_yday >= 119... failed

The problem is gone now.

WŻ
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Wiktor Żelazny <wz <at> freeshell.de>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 39084-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 39084-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#39084: Two `tm.tm_yday >= 119` tests fail while building
 neomutt
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:34 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:47:06PM +0100, Wiktor Żelazny wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Wiktor Żelazny wrote:
> 
> > A few days ago, I’ve started getting this while trying to upgrade
> > neomutt:
> >
> >    Test test_mutt_date_gmtime...                   [ FAILED ]
> >      Case Today:
> >        mutt_date_gmtime.c:59: Check tm.tm_yday >= 119... failed
> >
> > and
> >
> >    Test test_mutt_date_localtime...                [ FAILED ]
> >      Case Today:
> >        mutt_date_localtime.c:61: Check tm.tm_yday >= 119... failed
> 
> The problem is gone now.

Okay, closing :)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 115 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.