GNU bug report logs -
#39053
[PATCH] Add pulseaudio configuration and fix volume bugs
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> writes:
> Am Samstag, den 11.01.2020, 18:23 +0100 schrieb Marius Bakke:
>> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> writes:
>>
>> > This series of patches adds a configuration type for pulseaudio and
>> > also fixes
>> > a bug, where various applications would inadvertently max out the
>> > system volume
>> > (see e.g. #38172).
>>
>> Thanks! I've pushed the patches with mentioned tweaks in
>> 2c7511fb6..71e33e32f.
> Thanks! Also, I'm sorry about accidentally opening like 10 bugs due to
> my misconfiguration there. I only noticed after the fact, that merely
> CC'ing the original bug does nothing, when the mail is still sent to
> guix-patches as well. I've learned my lesson and will be more careful
> in the future.
Right, no worries!
> I do still have some open questions, though.
>> > +In addition to the above, @code{default-script-file} will be set to
>> > the
>> > +value of @code{script-file}. By default, @var{flat-volumes} is
>> > set
>> > to
>> > +``no'', so as to avoid bugs related to this feature.
>> >
>> The first sentence of this paragraph is obsolete, no? The second is
>> rather vague, so I opted to remove the whole thing. Let me know if
>> you
>> think something should be added!
> I'm not quite sure about the first sentence. While everyone can read
> the code and the output files produced from it, I think we should
> document, that we actually always insert this line into
> @file{daemon.conf}.
> For instance, if you don't supply your own @file{default.pa}, the first
> line of @file{daemon.conf} will be
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> default-script-file = /gnu/store/<hash>-pulseaudio-
> <version>/etc/pulse/default.pa
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> What are your thoughts on this?
Oh, right. I suppose that can be surprising. Would you like to
resubmit a documentation update?
I wonder if we could use the flunking new 'this-record', and refer to
the SCRIPT-FILE directly in the default parameter list. But that's
probably overkill for this instance. :-)
>> I added a (default: ...) on these two and removed the related
>> sentences.
> I was hesitant to do that due to the line limits. Do those not count
> for documentation or are such exceptions allowed?
Not sure what/if there are line length limits on guix.texi, but 95
characters should be okay for one-off instances like these. I suppose
we could escape a line break if it breaks someones workflow.
> Thanks again for your help and also thanks for your feedback.
Thanks!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 126 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.