Subject: bug#38970: closed (Closing the broken patch)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 18:28:03 +0000

Your bug report

#38970: [PATCH 21/22] gnu: pjproject-jami: Apply a missing patch.

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
38970: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38970
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Closing the broken patch
From: Jan <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:05:57 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

I broke the whole patch series, sorry, hope this solves everything.
I got smtp error and thought patches didn't send.

Jan Wielkiewicz

Subject: [PATCH 21/22] gnu: pjproject-jami: Apply a missing patch.
From: Jan Wielkiewicz <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: Jan Wielkiewicz <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 02:11:51 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

---
 gnu/packages/jami.scm | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/jami.scm b/gnu/packages/jami.scm
index ea66bed8a5..22c86e9b5b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/jami.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/jami.scm
@@ -165,7 +165,8 @@
                                                 "fix_ebusy_turn"
                                                 "ignore_ipv6_on_transport_check"
                                                 "fix_turn_connection_failure"
-                                                "disable_local_resolution"))
+                                                "disable_local_resolution"
+						"fix_assert_on_connection_attempt"))
                #t)))
          ;; TODO: We could use substitute-keyword-arguments instead of
          ;; repeating the phases from pjproject, but somehow it does
-- 
2.24.1