GNU bug report logs - #38844
28.0.50; Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 09:37:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38844 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38844 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:37:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:37:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.0.50; Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:36:28 +0800
C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
the function exec-path.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>,
 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38844: 28.0.50;
 Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 12:22:42 +0200
On January 1, 2020 11:36:28 AM GMT+02:00, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> the function exec-path.

That's because 'exec-path' the variable was introduced a long time ago.  The heuristics we use to search the NEWS files for symbols cannot distinguish between diffetent kinds that have the same names.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38844: 28.0.50;
 Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:38:08 +0800
Another case is the function file-size-human-readable, C-h f says it
probably is added in 27.1, but I checked it's available in 24.5,
though NEWS.27 does mention the function

> ** The function 'file-size-human-readable' accepts more optional arguments.

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:22 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On January 1, 2020 11:36:28 AM GMT+02:00, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> > version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> > is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> > the function exec-path.
>
> That's because 'exec-path' the variable was introduced a long time ago.  The heuristics we use to search the NEWS files for symbols cannot distinguish between diffetent kinds that have the same names




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 12:59:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38844: 28.0.50;
 Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:58:42 +0800
I just noticed 27.1 in "Probably introduced at or before Emacs version
27.1." is clickable and linked to relevant NEWS entry. It makes more
sense to me now.

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Another case is the function file-size-human-readable, C-h f says it
> probably is added in 27.1, but I checked it's available in 24.5,
> though NEWS.27 does mention the function
>
> > ** The function 'file-size-human-readable' accepts more optional arguments.
>
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:22 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On January 1, 2020 11:36:28 AM GMT+02:00, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> > > version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> > > is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> > > the function exec-path.
> >
> > That's because 'exec-path' the variable was introduced a long time ago.  The heuristics we use to search the NEWS files for symbols cannot distinguish between diffetent kinds that have the same names




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 12:59:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Wed, 01 Jan 2020 16:33:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38844: 28.0.50;
 Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 18:32:15 +0200
> From: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:38:08 +0800
> Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Another case is the function file-size-human-readable, C-h f says it
> probably is added in 27.1, but I checked it's available in 24.5,
> though NEWS.27 does mention the function

Fixed.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#38844; Package emacs. (Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:03:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #29 received at 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38844: 28.0.50; Incorrect result by
 help-fns--mention-first-release
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 04:02:45 +0200
Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> the function exec-path.

These are produced heuristically, which is why the text says "probably".
To make these less probabilistic is the subject of bug#49631, so I'm
closing this bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




bug closed, send any further explanations to 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 269 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.