GNU bug report logs -
#38844
28.0.50; Incorrect result by help-fns--mention-first-release
Previous Next
Reported by: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 09:37:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 28.0.50
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38844 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38844 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
the function exec-path.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On January 1, 2020 11:36:28 AM GMT+02:00, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> the function exec-path.
That's because 'exec-path' the variable was introduced a long time ago. The heuristics we use to search the NEWS files for symbols cannot distinguish between diffetent kinds that have the same names.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Another case is the function file-size-human-readable, C-h f says it
probably is added in 27.1, but I checked it's available in 24.5,
though NEWS.27 does mention the function
> ** The function 'file-size-human-readable' accepts more optional arguments.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:22 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On January 1, 2020 11:36:28 AM GMT+02:00, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> > version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> > is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> > the function exec-path.
>
> That's because 'exec-path' the variable was introduced a long time ago. The heuristics we use to search the NEWS files for symbols cannot distinguish between diffetent kinds that have the same names
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 11:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 12:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I just noticed 27.1 in "Probably introduced at or before Emacs version
27.1." is clickable and linked to relevant NEWS entry. It makes more
sense to me now.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Another case is the function file-size-human-readable, C-h f says it
> probably is added in 27.1, but I checked it's available in 24.5,
> though NEWS.27 does mention the function
>
> > ** The function 'file-size-human-readable' accepts more optional arguments.
>
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:22 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On January 1, 2020 11:36:28 AM GMT+02:00, Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> > > version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> > > is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> > > the function exec-path.
> >
> > That's because 'exec-path' the variable was introduced a long time ago. The heuristics we use to search the NEWS files for symbols cannot distinguish between diffetent kinds that have the same names
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 12:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Jan 2020 16:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:38:08 +0800
> Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Another case is the function file-size-human-readable, C-h f says it
> probably is added in 27.1, but I checked it's available in 24.5,
> though NEWS.27 does mention the function
Fixed.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38844
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> C-h f exec-path mentions "Probably introduced at or before Emacs
> version 22.1.", however, according to NEWS.27 the function exec-path
> is introduced in Emacs 27.1. I checked that Emacs 24.5 doesn't provide
> the function exec-path.
These are produced heuristically, which is why the text says "probably".
To make these less probabilistic is the subject of bug#49631, so I'm
closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug closed, send any further explanations to
38844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Xu Chunyang <xuchunyang56 <at> gmail.com>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 30 Aug 2021 02:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 269 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.