GNU bug report logs - #38807
[Feature request]: Support lisp workers like web workers.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: HaiJun Zhang <netjune <at> outlook.com>

Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:29:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: HaiJun Zhang <netjune <at> outlook.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 38807 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: bug#38807: [Feature request]: Support lisp workers like web workers.
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 11:57:52 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
OK. I got it.
One example is lsp-mode for dart language. One completion result is 10000 lines. And emacs doesn’t respond for about 3~4s. This experience kept me away from lsp-mode for half a year.
在 2020年1月1日 +0800 AM11:37,Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,写道:
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 11:20:25 +0800
> > From: HaiJun Zhang <netjune <at> outlook.com>
> > Cc: 38807 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > 在 2019年12月31日 +0800 AM12:26,Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,写道:
> >
> > This reminds me of an old joke: when a shop owner was approached by an
> > employee asking to work 5 days a week, the owner answered: let's start
> > with one, and then gradually arrive at 5.
> >
> > More to the point, I did say “you could start", didn't I?
> >
> > I can’t understand this. Can you explain it?
>
> Whatever application you have in mind, try implementing it using what
> we already have regarding Lisp threads, and see if the limitations
> Michael mentioned are really so grave. It could be that for some
> applications what we have is good enough. And if not, you will
> collect some experience and understand better what additional features
> do you need.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 63 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.