GNU bug report logs - #38797
27.0.50; Feature request: provide the opposite of xref-pop-marker-stack

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38797: closed (27.0.50; Feature request: provide the opposite
 of xref-pop-marker-stack)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:11:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:09:44 +0300
with message-id <84a38c32-3686-248f-64a4-7cd8ef3a8559 <at> yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#38797: 27.0.50; Feature request: provide the opposite of xref-pop-marker-stack
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38797,
regarding 27.0.50; Feature request: provide the opposite of xref-pop-marker-stack
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
38797: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38797
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: yyoncho <yyoncho <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 27.0.50;
 Feature request: provide the opposite of xref-pop-marker-stack
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:11:02 +0200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

ATM there xref-pop-marker-stack which is equivalent to going backwards
but there is no operation for going forward.

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org>,
 Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 38797-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho <yyoncho <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#38797: 27.0.50; Feature request: provide the opposite of
 xref-pop-marker-stack
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:09:44 +0300

On 09.11.2021 16:08, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> 9 nov. 2021 kl. 09.30 skrev Juri Linkov<juri <at> linkov.net>:
> 
>> Now pushed both.  Is this feature request is ready for closing?
> Thank you and yes, as far as I'm concerned. An unbounded number of improvements that can be made but we don't need to keep the bug open for that, do we?
> 
> 

Looks good to me as well. Thank you both.

Closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.