GNU bug report logs - #38769
[PATCH] import: Add importer for MELPA packages.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo <at> zancanaro.id.au>

Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:01:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 38769 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org>
To: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo <at> zancanaro.id.au>
Cc: 38769 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38769] [PATCH] import: Add importer for MELPA packages.
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:39:02 -0600
Carlo Zancanaro <carlo <at> zancanaro.id.au> writes:

> Hey Guix!
>
> I have for a while wanted to write an importer for MELPA packages that
> reads from the MELPA recipe and constructs a Guix package. This is
> primarily because the ELPA importer uses source tarballs, which we
> can't rely on for MELPA because they remove old tarballs and upload
> new ones whenever they rebuild the package.
>
> So, here is my importer!
>
> Probably the most controversial decision here is to always import the
> current head that MELPA would build. This means that when you run
> "guix import melpa" it gives you a package definition that should
> correspond to what MELPA currently has. This may not correspond to a
> release of the package, so we cannot easily give it a version, and
> thus I put the current date into the version string.
>
> I imagine it would be possible to combine this importer with the
> current ELPA one in some way, to use all the metadata provided by the
> ELPA importer, but then generate an origin based on the MELPA recipe,
> but that seemed more daunting to me than writing a new importer.
>
> Carlo
>
>

Hi Carlo! Thanks for your contribution. I have not yet had a chance to
look at it, but I agree that we /should/ combine this with the ELPA
importer in its current tradition: `guix import elpa -a melpa`. That
seems preferable to me, as it would avoid the need to deprecate a
command flag in our UX.

What do you think?

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
GNU Guix, Contributor | GNU Project, Webmaster
[DFC0 C7F7 9EE6 0CA7 AE55 5E19 6722 43C4 A03F 0EEE]
<brettg <at> gnu.org> <brettg <at> posteo.net>




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 216 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.