From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:23:50 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#38720 <38720@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#38720 <38720@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container Reply-To: bug#38720 <38720@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:23:50 +0000 retitle 38720 [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container reassign 38720 guix-patches submitter 38720 Efraim Flashner severity 38720 normal tag 38720 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 09:08:34 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2019 14:08:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50663 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijONu-0000NV-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:08:34 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijONt-0000NO-Dy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:08:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijONs-0000ov-8D for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:08:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijONr-0005NF-4d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:08:32 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:34962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijONq-0005Mb-U7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:08:31 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.13.108]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5A9540116 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:07:58 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container Message-ID: <20191223140758.GS1115@E5400> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Yg/4YF7t1SayoUom" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 178.62.234.194 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --Yg/4YF7t1SayoUom Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gh9b96O0vZdbsJLX" Content-Disposition: inline --gh9b96O0vZdbsJLX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've been using guix containers on foreign systems to bring some Guixy goodness to the unwashed sysadmins out there. When the container starts up it displays a message like "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t 65698' to get a shell into it." Sometimes when I try to do that I'll get an error message back about the system's nsenter not knowing about the '-a' flag. I have found that using a 'guix container' command works well for me. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --gh9b96O0vZdbsJLX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-system-linux-container-Recommend-guix-container.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom f2cd59c9eb756e243a5a01e6cd3a6a6e58a02be6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Efraim Flashner Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:05:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container. * gnu/system/linux-container.scm (container-script)[script]: Recommend using 'guix container' to get a shell inside the running container. --- gnu/system/linux-container.scm | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/system/linux-container.scm b/gnu/system/linux-container.scm index 2ab679ff3f..7d9e02b945 100644 --- a/gnu/system/linux-container.scm +++ b/gnu/system/linux-container.scm @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2015 David Thompson ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016, 2017, 2019 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2019 Arun Isaac +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2019 Efraim Flashner ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -195,9 +196,7 @@ that will be shared with the host system." ;; XXX: We can't quite call 'bindtextdomain' so there's actu= ally ;; no i18n. (info (G_ "system container is running as PID ~a~%") pid) - ;; XXX: Should we recommend 'guix container exec'? It's more - ;; verbose and doesn't bring much. - (info (G_ "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t ~a' to get a shell into i= t.~%") + (info (G_ "Run 'sudo guix container exec ~a /run/current-sys= tem/profile/bin/bash --login' to get a shell into it.~%") pid) (newline (guix-warning-port))) =20 --=20 2.24.1 --gh9b96O0vZdbsJLX-- --Yg/4YF7t1SayoUom Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl4Ayj4ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HYGhAAs84yI/T6OoxZR0tYc7yqxgxPOORPiPde8o2AphV2IdevCm7aozWmE5tA 54E8vDFiLqFvfAqnLGT63ZdZt3DN8M9Pm+1WRduN5PfllzzFdII/7EA/tJPZxLms fr0wJ3nER8u0eycwedBTN7IeXBjtRPwqzctRvrMy4MZxi8MMku/vNCHUOIRZ7tP6 NM/woZo7HXF5ElPiGFVjdcCEonD60e4yjLLm03W6LPX/6yuAIUpCwGsM17XY3j/p hyghA1O6BZ4OOuEZMVHpbElXaWJspzf6jZgzyB+ugwHQOowkUauhorZj+P3ZT+GD hbtUb/kVRdGaWMovy4ywBGXFzMgUTok4+KU0sseuTQlpJQjwuuO1EOhFK4X4DrqF ACvbEshRo+W/2GF2S66CjM/lAnrIWRbPo4o7d1m7hzCx/Q1kNmVv1sjSqaggQ8kI MY0ejO9fzNc57qpM/B89qGuZEzf5KzlKLLlklPEgNGPtsmVx2ZiAJz1Si9HPyQk6 gWIk0Cj1VKdFQ8a6g+pfcgDe/eSGG0/iCbfo1VRULAXZnv/BAqb/Z9HmklkZMtjO +PD8kNkzQoyQTTKgH33tj9oM/5zEmzRuuWVSP5Dh0DPEtHDjx8AeAX2q8FcVwRzA L2jWbrh8Q2QMjmohpEalRcz8mIDTrrI206iO4v56VwF97BGHc9g= =/fXD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Yg/4YF7t1SayoUom-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 30 17:05:14 2019 Received: (at 38720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2019 22:05:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1im3A1-0003uy-Ik for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:05:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39921) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1im39z-0003ug-G1 for 38720@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:05:11 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1im39u-00034v-8c; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:05:06 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=44560 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1im39s-0005z1-Nr; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:05:05 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [bug#38720] [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container References: <20191223140758.GS1115@E5400> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 23:05:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191223140758.GS1115@E5400> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:07:58 +0200") Message-ID: <87v9pxzcz5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38720 Cc: 38720@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi! Efraim Flashner skribis: > I've been using guix containers on foreign systems to bring some Guixy > goodness to the unwashed sysadmins out there. When the container starts > up it displays a message like "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t 65698' to get a > shell into it." Sometimes when I try to do that I'll get an error > message back about the system's nsenter not knowing about the '-a' flag. > I have found that using a 'guix container' command works well for me. Oh. I was conservative and thought that people would rather use =E2=80=9Cstandard=E2=80=9D tools. > From f2cd59c9eb756e243a5a01e6cd3a6a6e58a02be6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Efraim Flashner > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:05:04 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container. > > * gnu/system/linux-container.scm (container-script)[script]: Recommend > using 'guix container' to get a shell inside the running container. [...] > - ;; XXX: Should we recommend 'guix container exec'? It's m= ore > - ;; verbose and doesn't bring much. > - (info (G_ "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t ~a' to get a shell into= it.~%") > + (info (G_ "Run 'sudo guix container exec ~a /run/current-s= ystem/profile/bin/bash --login' to get a shell into it.~%") > pid) The comment is still correct: =E2=80=9Cguix container exec=E2=80=9D is more= verbose. :-) Should we change it so that =E2=80=9Cguix container exec PID=E2=80=9D witho= ut additional arguments runs /bin/sh by default, or something like that? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 05 13:28:08 2020 Received: (at 38720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2020 18:28:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44600 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioAdD-0004S6-T2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 13:28:08 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:56126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioAdC-0004Ra-EI for 38720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 13:28:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.13.108]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 819FE4015E; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 20:27:29 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#38720] [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container Message-ID: <20200105182729.GA1001@E5400> References: <20191223140758.GS1115@E5400> <87v9pxzcz5.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9pxzcz5.fsf@gnu.org> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38720 Cc: 38720@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:05:02PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi! >=20 > Efraim Flashner skribis: >=20 > > I've been using guix containers on foreign systems to bring some Guixy > > goodness to the unwashed sysadmins out there. When the container starts > > up it displays a message like "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t 65698' to get a > > shell into it." Sometimes when I try to do that I'll get an error > > message back about the system's nsenter not knowing about the '-a' flag. > > I have found that using a 'guix container' command works well for me. >=20 > Oh. I was conservative and thought that people would rather use > =E2=80=9Cstandard=E2=80=9D tools. >=20 > > From f2cd59c9eb756e243a5a01e6cd3a6a6e58a02be6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Efraim Flashner > > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:05:04 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container. > > > > * gnu/system/linux-container.scm (container-script)[script]: Recommend > > using 'guix container' to get a shell inside the running container. >=20 > [...] >=20 > > - ;; XXX: Should we recommend 'guix container exec'? It's= more > > - ;; verbose and doesn't bring much. > > - (info (G_ "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t ~a' to get a shell in= to it.~%") > > + (info (G_ "Run 'sudo guix container exec ~a /run/current= -system/profile/bin/bash --login' to get a shell into it.~%") > > pid) >=20 > The comment is still correct: =E2=80=9Cguix container exec=E2=80=9D is mo= re verbose. > :-) I can update the comment :) > Should we change it so that =E2=80=9Cguix container exec PID=E2=80=9D wit= hout additional > arguments runs /bin/sh by default, or something like that? I've never really used docker, but I'm pretty sure when you enter a docker container you also need to give it the path to a binary you want to run. I've thought about it a bit and now it displays this: (ins)efraim@E5400 ~/workspace/guix$ sudo /gnu/store/7l5qdb0lw4bbghd17cam8pz= daz86zd3l-run-container system container is running as PID 13663 Run 'sudo guix container exec 13663 /run/current-system/profile/bin/bash --= login' or run 'sudo nsenter -a -t 13663' to get a shell into it. making '/gnu/store/8rrwm6wdyzl5i4g38va29azxki412nkr-system' the current sys= tem... setting up setuid programs in '/run/setuid-programs'... populating /etc from /gnu/store/lvxrcy913ga9g4sg549kk06krb8bbq6m-etc... I think I like it like this with both options. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-system-linux-container-Recommend-guix-container.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 1e85542ad6de76f761a366ba8d83f61b63789384 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Efraim Flashner Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:05:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container. * gnu/system/linux-container.scm (container-script)[script]: Recommend using 'guix container' to get a shell inside the running container. --- gnu/system/linux-container.scm | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/system/linux-container.scm b/gnu/system/linux-container.scm index 2ab679ff3f..c8807398b3 100644 --- a/gnu/system/linux-container.scm +++ b/gnu/system/linux-container.scm @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2015 David Thompson ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016, 2017, 2019 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2019 Arun Isaac +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2020 Efraim Flashner ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -194,11 +195,13 @@ that will be shared with the host system." (define (explain pid) ;; XXX: We can't quite call 'bindtextdomain' so there's actu= ally ;; no i18n. + ;; XXX: Should we really give both options? 'guix container = exec' + ;; is a more verbose command. Hard to fail to enter the con= tainer + ;; when we list two options. (info (G_ "system container is running as PID ~a~%") pid) - ;; XXX: Should we recommend 'guix container exec'? It's more - ;; verbose and doesn't bring much. - (info (G_ "Run 'sudo nsenter -a -t ~a' to get a shell into i= t.~%") + (info (G_ "Run 'sudo guix container exec ~a /run/current-sys= tem/profile/bin/bash --login'\n") pid) + (info (G_ "or run 'sudo nsenter -a -t ~a' to get a shell int= o it.~%") pid) (newline (guix-warning-port))) =20 (call-with-container file-systems --=20 2.24.1 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl4SKpEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HObQ/7BmotOb48v1KtCLks782FIs2BIWc5dKBh0R5iHlob4/L6Bchu2a0rf7vh WZOzzxlHHZlFwva6kYw9R1Jrm6FF4M0eit8yfkNmTC9SCgxIiCDZwzimAFCd5gJs t1fV0xLZ0R/y4nVjXHFmE37sDvkm7j++D3nq/I2eEf+X3c3IpHKon99XaubEzYr4 zCNo2PqKtleYrn3Vp/fHl/3g/KhoRxzb2dtpcRWTy0pby5f9XORovdgKwBbMkCRu EX11/VH9isRm7Dlb/aZCT1swpPMod9Sk/bmCaxaM/k/OWImmY5TCoCX5GyIuL2/8 oh6ZgaYd8VvUkaZtjsxCPAfpzhId73pbMSJhAKKMsvjg5elc/o/tCcH1o7u99Tlb //PMN/W9zGTtIuST4gu83fU8EQflmsW0+7Qr7PefjZ96iW2f7Gr+vt2AqM/8woPg MdvqGeq+n1AkZLvHTZV1nni9wrzFCDWvcyF1YAHxF9vY/6kF70riay0cB5W4npXQ y8B5MPVL1IpjUhcJ2lcKusQNbfUIfkMr2jVlHGjm6bu4IHXCYYA1EMKLhIPOBLe8 bnAZ3BqxUB4KO3LHlTpUa0uyjlgSc1waFiq9p1S7TEhf6RLumz9ry/ONC2xXAE29 9bZi0vuBgIy+W1ztxgGlVkyxdCGzptx3mKfC8cHQqTTA/p0ijZ0= =0OHu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 04:56:37 2020 Received: (at 38720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2020 09:56:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioP7l-0005Di-7c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 04:56:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioP7k-0005DT-90 for 38720@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 04:56:36 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioP7e-0003jp-QL; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 04:56:30 -0500 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=57608 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ioP7e-0002h4-4A; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 04:56:30 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [bug#38720] [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container References: <20191223140758.GS1115@E5400> <87v9pxzcz5.fsf@gnu.org> <20200105182729.GA1001@E5400> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:56:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200105182729.GA1001@E5400> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sun, 5 Jan 2020 20:27:29 +0200") Message-ID: <87woa4di2b.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38720 Cc: 38720@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello! Efraim Flashner skribis: > From 1e85542ad6de76f761a366ba8d83f61b63789384 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Efraim Flashner > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:05:04 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container. > > * gnu/system/linux-container.scm (container-script)[script]: Recommend > using 'guix container' to get a shell inside the running container. OK, looks reasonable to me. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 05:21:13 2020 Received: (at 38720-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2020 10:21:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPVY-0005rg-U2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:21:13 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:53884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPVW-0005rT-LC for 38720-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:21:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.13.108]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCC8240103; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:20:33 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#38720] [PATCH] system: linux-container: Recommend guix container Message-ID: <20200106102033.GD1001@E5400> References: <20191223140758.GS1115@E5400> <87v9pxzcz5.fsf@gnu.org> <20200105182729.GA1001@E5400> <87woa4di2b.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87woa4di2b.fsf@gnu.org> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38720-done Cc: 38720-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. Patch pushed --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl4TCfEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1E7nA//QjHxlrl8c+yc+3aby5YzMIrESx8PdSPfgf31qDE0ffjkMlLTky8bZBOj d0a5mtflxLPdkzpna++oCEPHddcPKqMMn/WOUxseOnmzMgYn+SjU0cUuGitnY74h /3vnS+GKLIxz6Oa4W3npIH0xoOCb+gTEjm9uxr5/7evnoXO7FLQfyPPABgjq91lf 2Smwj8gEAvciveiI7cnAU4MsVGOOyLKD5QAredF28TKJec9Tb+RWcDktGhIqmWHI Ib8/s0MruKxXCgwaJ3bfJ2+hKz857sINqz0E0oUKPOyvoBZ8Ie1ORa/vHqmEpsu6 kPoWAFwWAJ6q5rIQOdO34x/PMFoNrDCV+TNs13pMS6FohjZxVUZfUyuG7GU0r5WX yl9XAfm7jzc85EKivE1ob0oX1XRx/uaVxo6julgXRs+bqIrDeBONAjDjPDJ2echb S50SY1t+CxEddnlzuVijkWzZlDS9vcYr25uS9AQMHr4+UMpPV/3BYFBserGnX/16 ltilctR+Cq8PWoHhBIwXS6i8xyK+T9gEYze7Ruyh0lmllrRMsyv2aIPKy+cF3vNd 9QcCn0frW3T+e0jn3MmTCj1QV4ykP+jlNMQ//wYCElDPo0T8RajWjMD7emcw91BU Se/cgXbyU4LJyJc3PzTu0SHI1d5z1KNlkQLevFlhLPBruzE1vSI= =ImO8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:23:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator