GNU bug report logs - #38647
26.3; image-next-file does not consider archived images

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: ynyaaa <at> gmail.com

Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:16:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: fixed

Found in version 26.3

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 38647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 38647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, ynyaaa <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#38647: 26.3; image-next-file does not consider archived images
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 02:47:44 +0300
>> All this indicates that instead of using 'directory-files',
>> 'image-next-file' should rely on 'archive-next-line' if the file
>> is opened from an archive, and on 'dired-next-line' otherwise.
>
> `archive-next-line' isn't used in tar mode buffers -- that's the
> problem: There's no unified interface across the different archive
> modes.  (Although perhaps there's just two?  arc-mode and tar-mode?

Yep, there's just two - these twins are going hand in hand,
for example, in image-mode.el in image-toggle-display-image:

			   (not (and (boundp 'archive-superior-buffer)
				     archive-superior-buffer))
			   (not (and (boundp 'tar-superior-buffer)
				     tar-superior-buffer))

>> Also this means that if there is no corresponding dired buffer
>> already visited, then 'image-next-file' should create an internal
>> dired buffer just for the sake of file image navigation.
>
> Hm.  I think that makes sense...  but it would perhaps be a bit
> surprising?

Maybe when not requested, such Dired buffer should be killed afterwards,
or its name should start with a space.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 348 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.