GNU bug report logs -
#38628
Character literals unsupported in source 'snippets'
Previous Next
Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:28:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 18 Dec 2019 23:06:21 +0100
with message-id <877e2tcmqq.fsf <at> devup.no>
and subject line Re: bug#38628: [PATCH] gexp: Allow character literals in GEXP->SEXP.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38628,
regarding Character literals unsupported in source 'snippets'
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
38628: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38628
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Guix,
If you try to use a character literal in a source 'snippet', Guix will
complain about an "unsupported input". I.e. adding the following to the
'hello' package definition:
(snippet '(begin #\!))
Results in:
guix build: error: /home/marius/guix/gnu/packages/base.scm:73:2: package `hello <at> 2.10' has an invalid input: #\!
This is a fairly recent regression. I tracked it down to the following commit:
commit 24ab804ce11fe12ff49cd144a3d9c4bfcf55b41c
Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Mon Sep 23 22:17:39 2019 +0200
gexp: Catch and report non-self-quoting gexp inputs.
Previously we would, for example, generate build scripts in the store;
when trying to run them, we'd get a 'read' error due to the presence
of #<foo> syntax in there.
* guix/gexp.scm (gexp->sexp)[self-quoting?]: New procedure.
[reference->sexp]: Check whether the argument in a <gexp-input> box is
self-quoting. Raise a '&gexp-input-error' condition if it's not.
* tests/gexp.scm ("lower-gexp, non-self-quoting input"): New test.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Also it would be nice to add a tiny test close to the one that
>> 24ab804ce11fe12ff49cd144a3d9c4bfcf55b41c added.
>
> Good idea. I came up with this:
>
> diff --git a/tests/gexp.scm b/tests/gexp.scm
> index 84c16422c2..8b1596f66d 100644
> --- a/tests/gexp.scm
> +++ b/tests/gexp.scm
> @@ -886,6 +886,12 @@
> (run-with-store %store
> (lower-gexp #~(foo #$+)))))
>
> +(test-equal "lower-gexp, character literal"
> + '(#\+)
> + (lowered-gexp-sexp
> + (run-with-store %store
> + (lower-gexp #~(#\+)))))
> +
> (test-assertm "gexp->derivation #:references-graphs"
> (mlet* %store-monad
> ((one (text-file "one" (random-text)))
>
> WDYT?
I ended up pushing this in ab7010af1f1077c056529769a53a380147c3933f,
even though I suspect there is an easier test that could reveal this
problem without involving the store, somewhere. Improvements welcome.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 208 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.