GNU bug report logs - #38600
Unbound variable for some package --show invocations.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 01:10:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#38600: closed (Re: bug#38600: Unbound variable for some
 package --show invocations.)
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:43:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#38600: Unbound variable for some package --show invocations.

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 38600 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
38600: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38600
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 38600-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38600: Unbound variable for some package --show invocations.
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:41:20 +0200
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 03:22:02PM -0800, Jacob MacDonald wrote:
> Yes, though interestingly I can't reproduce in a development tree at
> the commit used when I submitted the report
> (9f9520a1299fccd8508d03ce0c9280c6e0030207). In summary:
> 
> Error occurs:
> 1. In 9f9520a1299fccd8508d03ce0c9280c6e0030207
> 2. In 00386d3430f12710997f17091a55c07323ff138c
> 3. In 00386d3430f12710997f17091a55c07323ff138c after running guix pull
> once again (this did cause a rebuild of compute-guix-derivation)
> Error does not occur:
> In the Guix source tree (using the pre-inst-env script) @
> 9f9520a1299fccd8508d03ce0c9280c6e0030207
> 
> Would it be useful to compare the hashes for packages I build manually
> to hashes of the packages from the substitute server? If so, what
> packages should I check and what's the easiest way (and is guix
> challenge useful in this situation [forgive me, I'm pretty unfamiliar
> with debugging this kind of error in Guix])?

I think it's more likely that it's a transitive error and while it
shouldn't have happened it's probably not worth worrying about.

> 
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 8:38 AM Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> >
> > If you run 'guix pull' again do you still get the same errors?
> >
> > --
> > Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
> > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Unbound variable for some package --show invocations.
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:08:48 -0800
Noticed the problem with cl-slime-swank, but seems to happen with a
variety of packages including sbcl-cl-uglify-js itself. I checked
javascript.scm, which does import lisp-xyz; Haven't done any deeper
debugging to discover possible causes.

Backtrace follows.

$ guix package --show=sbcl-cl-uglify-js
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
   222:29 19 (map1 (((gnu packages gettext)) ((gnu packages #)) (#) …))
   222:29 18 (map1 (((gnu packages ghostscript)) ((gnu packages …)) …))
   222:29 17 (map1 (((gnu packages gl)) ((gnu packages glib)) ((…)) …))
   222:29 16 (map1 (((gnu packages glib)) ((gnu packages gnome)) # …))
   222:29 15 (map1 (((gnu packages gnome)) ((gnu packages gnupg)) # …))
   222:29 14 (map1 (((gnu packages gnupg)) ((gnu packages #)) ((…)) …))
   222:29 13 (map1 (((gnu packages gstreamer)) ((gnu packages #)) # …))
   222:29 12 (map1 (((gnu packages gtk)) ((gnu packages image)) (#) …))
   222:29 11 (map1 (((gnu packages image)) ((gnu packages #)) ((…)) …))
   222:29 10 (map1 (((gnu packages imagemagick)) ((gnu packages …)) …))
   222:17  9 (map1 (((gnu packages javascript)) ((gnu packages #)) …))
  2800:17  8 (resolve-interface (gnu packages javascript) #:select _ …)
In ice-9/threads.scm:
    390:8  7 (_ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  2726:13  6 (_)
In ice-9/threads.scm:
    390:8  5 (_ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  2994:20  4 (_)
   2312:4  3 (save-module-excursion #<procedure 7fbf1f28b330 at ice-…>)
  3014:26  2 (_)
In unknown file:
           1 (primitive-load-path "gnu/packages/javascript" #<proced…>)
In gnu/packages/javascript.scm:
   460:10  0 (_)

gnu/packages/javascript.scm:460:10: error: sbcl-cl-uglify-js: unbound variable



This bug report was last modified 5 years and 160 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.