From pll@permabit.com Wed Jun 11 10:26:45 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Jun 2008 17:26:46 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5BHQfvV003699 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:26:42 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:33598 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1K6U3q-0004N7-RH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:24:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6U5h-0002gX-EY for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:40 -0400 Received: from postage-due.permabit.com ([204.246.225.5]:49865) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6U5h-0002g7-2g for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:33 -0400 Received: from ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com (ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com [10.95.8.74]) by postage-due.permabit.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m5BHQRho029591; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:27 -0400 Received: by ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com (Postfix, from userid 1065) id 0616A5981D; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Lussier Cc: p.lussier@comcast.net To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode Message-Id: <20080611172627.0616A5981D@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Permabit-Spam: SKIPPED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 In a buffer with text, the actions: C-SPC C-n C-e with trasient-mark-mode on results only in the last line being marked. If a rectangle is being marked out, this results only in the region from the beginning column of the last line to the end of the last line being marked. C-h k C-e reports: C-e (translated from C-S-e) runs the command move-end-of-line, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple.el'. C-h k C-S-e reports: C-e runs the command move-end-of-line, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple.el'. Though they are both bound to move-end-of-line, they have different behaviors. The above sequence to mark a rectangle, if done with C-S-e instead of C-e, works as expected with the entire region being marked as desired. I have invoked emacs both with and without -Q and I get the same behavior. Interestingly, invoking emacs with -nw causes emacs to behave normally. There is no difference between C-e and C-S-e, and C-e works as expected in -nw mode. Thanks, Paul In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of 2008-04-10 on ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.70101000 configured using `configure '--prefix=/usr/local' '--with-kerberos5' '--with-x' '--with-x-toolkit=athena'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: C value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: nil default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: CPerl Minor modes in effect: iswitchb-mode: t shell-dirtrack-mode: t show-paren-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t column-number-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: (only . 1) abbrev-mode: t Recent input: C-S-a C-SPC C-S-w h t h e SPC C-SPC C-S-e C-S-w f r o m SPC b u i l / / ( ) C-S-x C-S-s C-S-a C-SPC C-S-h k C-e C-S-x 1 C-S-x k x C-S-a C-S-d C-S-d C-S-d C-S-d C-S-g x r e p o r t Recent messages: Mark activated Mark set [2 times] Mark set [4 times] Mark set [2 times] Type C-x 1 to delete the help window. Making completion list... Quit Making completion list... From cyd@stupidchicken.com Mon Jul 28 05:49:31 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 386) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 12:49:31 +0000 Received: from furry (c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.201.57]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SCnSrA022570 for <386@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:49:29 -0700 Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B51DBC059; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:49:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Paul Lussier Cc: 386@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:49:22 -0400 Message-ID: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > In a buffer with text, the actions: > C-SPC > C-n > C-e > > with trasient-mark-mode on results only in the last line being marked. > If a rectangle is being marked out, this results only in the region > from the beginning column of the last line to the end of the last line > being marked. I can't reproduce this. Do you still see this problem? If so, please provide an exact recipe, starting with emacs -Q From pll@permabit.com Mon Jul 28 06:28:58 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 386) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 13:28:58 +0000 Received: from postage-due.permabit.com (postage-due.permabit.com [204.246.225.5]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SDSsqj000366 for <386@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:28:56 -0700 Received: from ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com.permabit.com (ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com [10.95.8.74]) by postage-due.permabit.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m6SDSnhN006285; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:28:49 -0400 From: Paul Lussier To: Chong Yidong Cc: 386@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:28:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:49:22 -0400") Message-ID: <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Permabit-Spam: SKIPPED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Chong Yidong writes: >> In a buffer with text, the actions: >> C-SPC >> C-n >> C-e >> >> with trasient-mark-mode on results only in the last line being marked. >> If a rectangle is being marked out, this results only in the region >> from the beginning column of the last line to the end of the last line >> being marked. > > I can't reproduce this. Do you still see this problem? If so, please > provide an exact recipe, starting with emacs -Q Yes, I still see this problem. The above recipe *was* with -Q. $ emacs -Q & M-< ; you're in the *scratch* buffer, so move to the top, and mark ; the text. C-SPC C-n C-n ; See [1] C-e ; See [2] [1] Highlighted text is currently: ;; This buffer is for notes you don't want to save, and for Lisp evaluation. ;; If you want to create a file, visit that file with C-x C-f, with cursor on line 3, col 1. [2] Highlighted text is currently: ;; then enter the text in that file's own buffer. with cursor on line 3, column 49 (just after the '.'). M-x emacs-version claims: GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of 2008-07-07 Interestingly, this *only* seems to happen in X. If I run emacs -nw, I do not see the same problem. C-h k C-e interestingly says: C-e (translated from C-S-e) runs the command move-end-of-line, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple.el'. Whereas C-h k C-S-e saysL C-e runs the command move-end-of-line, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple.el'. So, it *seems* somehow, that C-S-e is behaving as C-e should... I'm not sure why C-e is "translated" from anything. And attempts at re-mapping in my ~/.emacs doesn't seem to work. I was going to update my CVS today and try another build. I'll let you know if that does anything. -- Thanks, Paul From cyd@stupidchicken.com Mon Jul 28 06:52:16 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 386) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 13:52:16 +0000 Received: from furry (c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.201.57]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SDqDkO006478 for <386@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:52:14 -0700 Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6C5DC059; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Paul Lussier Cc: 386@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> (Paul Lussier's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:28:48 -0400") Message-ID: <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Paul Lussier writes: >> I can't reproduce this. Do you still see this problem? If so, please >> provide an exact recipe, starting with emacs -Q > > Yes, I still see this problem. The above recipe *was* with -Q. > > $ emacs -Q & > > M-< ; you're in the *scratch* buffer, so move to the top, and mark > ; the text. > C-SPC > C-n C-n ; See [1] > C-e ; See [2] > > > [1] Highlighted text is currently: > > ;; This buffer is for notes you don't want to save, and for Lisp evaluation. > ;; If you want to create a file, visit that file with C-x C-f, > > with cursor on line 3, col 1. > > [2] Highlighted text is currently: > > ;; then enter the text in that file's own buffer. > > with cursor on line 3, column 49 (just after the '.'). I can't reproduce it on latest CVS. Please try with that and see if it still occurs. Thanks. > M-x emacs-version claims: > > GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of 2008-07-07 > > Interestingly, this *only* seems to happen in X. If I run emacs -nw, I > do not see the same problem. > > C-h k C-e interestingly says: > > C-e (translated from C-S-e) runs the command move-end-of-line, which > is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple.el'. > > Whereas C-h k C-S-e saysL > > C-e runs the command move-end-of-line, which is an interactive > compiled Lisp function in `simple.el'. > > So, it *seems* somehow, that C-S-e is behaving as C-e should... > I'm not sure why C-e is "translated" from anything. And attempts at > re-mapping in my ~/.emacs doesn't seem to work. > > I was going to update my CVS today and try another build. I'll let you > know if that does anything. From pll@permabit.com Mon Jul 28 08:33:36 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 386) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 15:33:36 +0000 Received: from postage-due.permabit.com (postage-due.permabit.com [204.246.225.5]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SFXW2r031618 for <386@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:33:34 -0700 Received: from ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com.permabit.com (ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com [10.95.8.74]) by postage-due.permabit.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m6SFXRhN008155; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:33:27 -0400 From: Paul Lussier To: Chong Yidong Cc: 386@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:33:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:07 -0400") Message-ID: <6ewsj6koqg.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Permabit-Spam: SKIPPED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Chong Yidong writes: > I can't reproduce it on latest CVS. Please try with that and see if it > still occurs. Thanks. Wow! I just found that I was completely wrong in my recipe for recreating this problem. I was saying the actions for recreation were: M-< C-SPC C-n C-n C-e However, what I was actuall typing to cause the problem was: M-< C-SPC C-e In fact, using the recipe I claimed caused the problem (C-n vs. ) works exactly as expected. But using the down arrow key results in the behavior I reported. My apologies. My fingers often do things my brain is unaware of :) -- Paul From cyd@stupidchicken.com Mon Jul 28 09:04:58 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 386) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 16:04:59 +0000 Received: from furry (c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.201.57]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SG4tv6006293 for <386@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:04:57 -0700 Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBCD5C059; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:04:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Paul Lussier Cc: 386@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6ewsj6koqg.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:04:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6ewsj6koqg.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> (Paul Lussier's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:33:27 -0400") Message-ID: <87abg2xaea.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Paul Lussier writes: > Wow! I just found that I was completely wrong in my recipe for > recreating this problem. > > what I was actuall typing to cause the problem was: > > M-< > C-SPC > > > C-e > > In fact, using the recipe I claimed caused the problem (C-n > vs. ) works exactly as expected. But using the down arrow key > results in the behavior I reported. I still can't reproduce this. It's likely you have some customization that's causing this bug; try again with emacs -Q. From pll@permabit.com Mon Jul 28 09:26:14 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 386) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 16:26:14 +0000 Received: from postage-due.permabit.com (postage-due.permabit.com [204.246.225.5]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SGQBu1012912 for <386@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:26:12 -0700 Received: from ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com.permabit.com (ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com [10.95.8.74]) by postage-due.permabit.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m6SGQ6hN009021; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:26:06 -0400 From: Paul Lussier To: Chong Yidong Cc: 386@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6ewsj6koqg.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87abg2xaea.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:26:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87abg2xaea.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:04:45 -0400") Message-ID: <6esktukmap.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Permabit-Spam: SKIPPED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Chong Yidong writes: > I still can't reproduce this. It's likely you have some customization > that's causing this bug; try again with emacs -Q. That was with -Q. Though not with C-n as previously reported, but rather using the down arrow key. -- Paul From cyd@stupidchicken.com Mon Jul 28 13:26:32 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 20:26:32 +0000 Received: from cyd (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SKQTXp007653 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:26:31 -0700 Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D540357E2EC; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:28:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Mark unreproducible bug as moreinfo Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:28:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87abg1lpng.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii tags 386 moreinfo From geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Mon Jul 28 13:58:25 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jul 2008 20:58:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6SKwKfk014764 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:58:22 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNZnQ-0005Hp-4u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:58:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNZnN-0005HT-W8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:58:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54547 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNZnN-0005HQ-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:58:17 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:35956 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNZnN-0002UG-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:58:17 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KNZnG-00088n-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:58:10 +0000 Received: from remote5.student.chalmers.se ([129.16.29.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:58:10 +0000 Received: from bojohan+news by remote5.student.chalmers.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:58:10 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se (Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd?=) Subject: Re: bug#386: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:57:58 +0200 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6ewsj6koqg.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87abg2xaea.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6esktukmap.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: remote5.student.chalmers.se Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:a9U/T0H7+X2wrzjvEZlTGsgLeOo= Sender: news X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Paul Lussier writes: > Chong Yidong writes: > >> I still can't reproduce this. It's likely you have some customization >> that's causing this bug; try again with emacs -Q. > > That was with -Q. Though not with C-n as previously reported, but > rather using the down arrow key. Have you been playing with xmodmap? -- Johan Bockgård From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 11 01:38:00 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 05:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cjw-00038A-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:38:00 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cju-000383-Q7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:37:59 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cfj-0002ni-AI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:33:39 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:30:39 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #386 X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2cfj-0002ni-AI X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316324019.41745@hnrXV0LkOkLYVppbVjewvQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) tags 386 fixed close 386 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 11 01:39:38 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 05:39:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2clV-0003Ba-NU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:39:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2clT-0003BU-Rv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:39:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2chN-0003In-9D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:35:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:58804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2chN-0003Ij-7m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:35:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2chM-00051q-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:35:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2chL-0003IX-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:35:20 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:37366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2chK-0003IT-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:35:19 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2chE-0002qo-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:35:12 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#386: 23.0.60; Different behavior in C-e and C-S-e between -nw and normal mode In-Reply-To: ("Johan \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Bockg\=E5rd\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:57:58 +0200") Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:30:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87sktup419.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6e8wvmnnn3.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87hcaap14o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6ewsj6koqg.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> <87abg2xaea.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6esktukmap.fsf@ambivalent-optimist.permabit.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Mia Doi Todd's _Cosmic Ocean Ship_: "Canto de =?iso-8859-1?Q?Iemanj=E1=22?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2chE-0002qo-Js X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316324112.73987@waObFY9d0NDYop2GtKZYVw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se (Johan Bockg=E5rd) writes: >> That was with -Q. Though not with C-n as previously reported, but >> rather using the down arrow key. > > Have you been playing with xmodmap? More information was requested three years ago, so I'm closing this bug. If this is still a problem, please reopen the report. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:18:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator