GNU bug report logs -
#38529
Make --pure the default for `guix environment'?
Previous Next
Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 15:43:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #200 received at 38529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Happy New Year!
(if you are using a gregorian calendar based on the January 1srt reform)
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 20:09, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
> “profile” is a tempting choice, but it’s treacherous because we might be
> blinded by the glow of the implementation of environments as volatile
> profiles. On the other hand: if we could also move some of the features
> of the “package” sub-command under “profile” (e.g. those that relate to
> the management of, well, profiles), that could be a winning move.
If the new "guix profile" does more or less the same thing than the
current "guix environment", then I find the word "profile" confusing
because the concept of "profile" is not exactly the same elsewhere.
However, if the current CLI is changed is a bit, for example splitting
the current "guix package", then why not.
I mean, let consider the new command 'profile' with subcommands:
- guix profile new
- guix profile list
etc. i.e., managing the profiles as it has been recently described
(sorry too lazy to correctly refer where, but e.g., this thread [1]).
*and* with the subcommand 'create' or 'temporary' or <naming-is-hard>,
i.e., "guix profile create" doing more or less what the current "guix
environment" is doing.
Wouaouw! It is far far away from the initial idea behind this thread. :-)
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-10/msg00565.html
All the best,
simon
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 358 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.