GNU bug report logs -
#38480
[PATCH] gnu: Add lolcat
Previous Next
Full log
Message #17 received at 38480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello!
Am Sonntag, den 15.12.2019, 00:28 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hello!
>
> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> skribis:
>
> > From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
> > Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 02:46:44 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add lolcat
> >
> > * gnu/packages/games.scm (lolcat): New package.
>
> [...]
>
> > + (replace 'install
> > + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> > + (let ((dest (map (lambda (path) (string-append path
> > "/bin"))
> > + (list (assoc-ref outputs "out")
> > + (assoc-ref outputs
> > "censor")))))
> > + (for-each mkdir-p dest)
> > + (install-file "lolcat" (car dest))
> > + (install-file "censor" (cadr dest))
> > + #t))))))
> > + (outputs (list "out" "censor"))
>
> Can’t we keep them both in the same output? Separate outputs are
> normally only used when it helps save space, but I don’t think that’s
> a
> concern here. :-)
Of course we can. I initially separated them, because it's really two
very different programs put into one git repo, but of course the
separation serves no real purpose.
> > + (home-page "https://github.com/jaseg/lolcat")
> > + (synopsis "Rainbow coloring effect for text console
> > display")
> > + (description "Lolcat concatenates files and streams like
> > regular cat,
> ^
> ^
> Maybe @command{cat} and @command{lolcat}.
Not sure about @command{lolcat}, since it's at the start of the
sentence, but okay.
> Could you send an updated patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
Patch is attached.
Regards,
Leo
[0001-gnu-Add-lolcat.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 220 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.