GNU bug report logs - #38474
4M, 12M or 24M partition alignment

Previous Next

Package: parted;

Reported by: Marcel Partap <mpartap <at> gmx.net>

Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:44:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38474: closed (4M, 12M or 24M partition alignment)
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 22:51:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:50:11 -0800
with message-id <20200106225011.GB29542 <at> lister.brianlane.com>
and subject line Re: bug#38474: 4M, 12M or 24M partition alignment
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38474,
regarding 4M, 12M or 24M partition alignment
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
38474: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38474
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Marcel Partap <mpartap <at> gmx.net>
To: bug-parted <at> gnu.org
Subject: 4M, 12M or 24M partition alignment
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 23:10:30 +0100
Dear parted devs,
is there a way to make partition boundaries align to erasure block size presumably used on common USB flash memory chips?
Could it make much of a difference?

Best Regards,
#marcel


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>
To: Marcel Partap <mpartap <at> gmx.net>
Cc: 38474-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38474: 4M, 12M or 24M partition alignment
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:50:11 -0800
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:10:30PM +0100, Marcel Partap wrote:
> Dear parted devs,
> is there a way to make partition boundaries align to erasure block size presumably used on common USB flash memory chips?
> Could it make much of a difference?

parted only knows about the alignment reported by the device, so if it
reports 512b that's what it will use. There's no way to override this
and have it calculate a different alignment automatically.

But you can use the MiB units to set the sizes yourself so that you can
make them start exactly where you want them.

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart



This bug report was last modified 5 years and 221 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.