From unknown Thu Sep 11 20:11:50 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38471: meta: I don't receive follow-ups to bug reports I submitted Resent-From: Robert Vollmert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 38471 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 38471@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157538381319728 (code B ref -1); Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:37:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2019 14:36:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IL-000587-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:53 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44579) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IJ-000580-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IG-0006kq-LD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IA-0004id-VR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:44 -0500 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.172]:40246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IA-0004Tt-NP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:42 -0500 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47S4LH0frJzQkJc for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id PwrJVn7LOWjG for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:35 +0100 (CET) From: Robert Vollmert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:34 +0100 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.241.56.172 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I remarked on this before: = https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-06/msg00315.html It seems that I don=E2=80=99t get follow-up emails to bug reports I = submitted unless people explicitly put me in CC (presumably by reply to all in the = original email thread). I=E2=80=99ve failed to answer follow-up queries to a number of = bugs due to this; assuming this doesn=E2=80=99t affect only me, this seems to be quite bad = for dealing with bugs effectively. Recent example: I did not receive Guillaume=E2=80=99s first reply in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38469 Related: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D5439 (against = debbugs). I might report this against debbugs itself instead, but to me the bug is = more =E2=80=9Cthe Guix bug tracker doesn=E2=80=99t send follow-ups=E2=80=9D = rather than the specific debbugs issue. E.g. fixing this by using a different bug tracker would be great! = :) From unknown Thu Sep 11 20:11:50 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38471: meta: I don't receive follow-ups to bug reports I submitted Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38471 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Robert Vollmert Cc: 38471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38471.1575996056519 (code B ref 38471); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 38471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2019 16:40:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieiZE-00008I-4Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:40:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieiZB-000081-SI for 38471@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:40:54 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieiZ6-0003GE-AE; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:40:48 -0500 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=53328 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ieiZ5-0000vw-7T; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:40:48 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 20 Frimaire an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:40:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Robert Vollmert's message of "Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:34 +0100") Message-ID: <87lfrknng2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Robert Vollmert skribis: > I remarked on this before: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/= 2019-06/msg00315.html > > It seems that I don=E2=80=99t get follow-up emails to bug reports I submi= tted unless > people explicitly put me in CC (presumably by reply to all in the origina= l email > thread). I=E2=80=99ve failed to answer follow-up queries to a number of b= ugs due to this; > assuming this doesn=E2=80=99t affect only me, this seems to be quite bad = for dealing with > bugs effectively. > > Recent example: I did not receive Guillaume=E2=80=99s first reply in > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38469 > > Related: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D5439 (against de= bbugs). > > I might report this against debbugs itself instead, but to me the bug is = more > =E2=80=9Cthe Guix bug tracker doesn=E2=80=99t send follow-ups=E2=80=9D ra= ther than the specific debbugs > issue. E.g. fixing this by using a different bug tracker would be great! = :) I=E2=80=99m not sure what the problem is. Could you bring it up on the help-debbugs@gnu.org mailing list? https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-debbugs Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Thu Sep 11 20:11:50 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Robert Vollmert Subject: bug#38471: closed (Close) Message-ID: References: X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 38471 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 38471@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 20:41:04 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1753735264-27324-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1753735264-27324-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #38471: meta: I don't receive follow-ups to bug reports I submitted which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 38471@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 38471: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38471 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1753735264-27324-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 38471-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2025 20:40:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugUe9-000754-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:40:33 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugUe4-00073r-8k for 38471-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:40:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E67B4; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:40:22 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id WDdFGXegWlYH; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (86.56.141.77.rev.sfr.net [77.141.56.86]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A99F14C; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:40:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:40:18 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: 38471-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Close Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.90 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.30)[75.00%]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 14E67B4 X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38471-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Solved with the move to codeberg. Andreas ------------=_1753735264-27324-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2019 14:36:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IL-000587-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:53 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44579) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IJ-000580-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IG-0006kq-LD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IA-0004id-VR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:44 -0500 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.172]:40246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9IA-0004Tt-NP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:36:42 -0500 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47S4LH0frJzQkJc for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id PwrJVn7LOWjG for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:35 +0100 (CET) From: Robert Vollmert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: meta: I don't receive follow-ups to bug reports I submitted Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:36:34 +0100 To: bug-guix@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.241.56.172 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I remarked on this before: = https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-06/msg00315.html It seems that I don=E2=80=99t get follow-up emails to bug reports I = submitted unless people explicitly put me in CC (presumably by reply to all in the = original email thread). I=E2=80=99ve failed to answer follow-up queries to a number of = bugs due to this; assuming this doesn=E2=80=99t affect only me, this seems to be quite bad = for dealing with bugs effectively. Recent example: I did not receive Guillaume=E2=80=99s first reply in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38469 Related: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D5439 (against = debbugs). I might report this against debbugs itself instead, but to me the bug is = more =E2=80=9Cthe Guix bug tracker doesn=E2=80=99t send follow-ups=E2=80=9D = rather than the specific debbugs issue. E.g. fixing this by using a different bug tracker would be great! = :) ------------=_1753735264-27324-1--