From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:26:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 17:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 38445 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 38445@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157522084532003 (code B ref -1); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 17:21:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2019 17:20:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibSto-0008K6-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:44 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStm-0008Jw-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStl-0001Dy-I3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStk-0002Wk-Du for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:36017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStj-0002VF-0f; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:39 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id p17so14539639wma.1; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:20:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2L9c47OA80KW1nXyvY+sJpbqcomW+LKNAjBlm2R9Yls=; b=JtiGMTfpYIvcPlkG3PH7toN6hhtNu1JGIMrUD1aOVF6JbqylEFinUH6En3A2LbbZ4r DVFfJR+qjjUlLYQZaMdMJbJ8xXnctsns4nmuzev4dh9AArXB6QboOfcrhWeuo/g2pxVX 3jL2d8xli19aMw88G/QR4sXX8kWhiy8ld4Wb2lY3kw7Qhrr5jZUDw/QLb4o8WoR7FdeL RYl9xK80iQTRnahalkOKRXdIY+3aNUfewU6A0FcciHN0kBESPSJajPCzfWhdnL6SG/ci EKs7Fm2jGUUZDgclsRYl6fwPFJHYbhWRBC7gICW0Dv2IR+0oXZGcaxOCUFX1vTxMUX+T HEbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWStS8mf43xFz39lGzvJIACYhxVd4lp8p4+El1y6goPPrBxLNdm wN//PuoBCN5NFLNb2Gx2yHIfNtPr X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+5DOf5TVT7nmIswiijY432WPBb4unRtqIUGshYH9y7NrQ+zVOTJnSvXkAcbfd6ODFwtfAhA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:305:: with SMTP id q5mr25497695wmd.167.1575220837242; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:b51f:470:88de:5f36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16sm6268347wmb.36.2019.12.01.09.20.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:20:36 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 18:20:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.54 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=99c45877a984dd0148151b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 broke Guix CI. Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Hi, https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D99c45877a984dd01481= 51b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 broke Guix CI. The reason is: (local-file (string-append "" "../some-file")) now differs from (local-file "../some-file") And in gnu/system/install.scm (line 246) there's a STRING-APPEND. We could probably do an easy fix by changing (string-append "exemples/" ...) to (string-append "gnu/system/exemples/" ...) but still, I find that new behaviour weird. Cl=C3=A9ment From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:26:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken Resent-From: Bengt Richter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 03:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38445 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 38445@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org Reply-To: Bengt Richter Received: via spool by 38445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38445.15752576325609 (code B ref 38445); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 03:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 38445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2019 03:33:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibcTA-0001SP-GS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:33:52 -0500 Received: from imta-37.everyone.net ([216.200.145.37]:47178 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibcT7-0001SF-HL for 38445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:33:51 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0004962.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xB23VUu2010307; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 19:33:48 -0800 X-Eon-Originating-Account: XkN9MoVIxdhWJd1E7AF69oDiWzDsBpYhxkDjx_lit5U X-Eon-Dm: m0116787.ppops.net Received: by m0116787.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 32d0d199) id m0116787.5dc217be.66a787; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 19:33:46 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJd5IYanHBTjQIAAAAD,c2ade7d62d35c454e2d49543cf214f96 X-Eip: U9YtRiQuHWR5KxNyvl39n-ouWs9OA6BouAaqrddlx4k Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2019 19:33:38 -0800 From: Bengt Richter Message-ID: <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> References: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-12-01_04:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=666 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912020028 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On +2019-12-01 18:20:24 +0100, Clément Lassieur wrote: > Hi, > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=99c45877a984dd0148151b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 > > broke Guix CI. > > The reason is: > > (local-file (string-append "" "../some-file")) > > now differs from > > (local-file "../some-file") > > And in gnu/system/install.scm (line 246) there's a STRING-APPEND. > > We could probably do an easy fix by changing (string-append ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Would s/exemples/examples/g do any good? │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ > "exemples/" ...) to (string-append "gnu/system/exemples/" ...) but │ │ > still, I find that new behaviour weird. │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ > > Clément > > > -- Regards, Bengt Richter From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:26:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38445 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bengt Richter Cc: 38445@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org Received: via spool by 38445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38445.15752774687985 (code B ref 38445); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 38445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2019 09:04:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibhd6-00024j-HH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:04:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:37103) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibhd5-00024W-2J for 38445@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:04:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id f129so22242755wmf.2 for <38445@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:04:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=JUT9bexmVdV9tdCAwl05diZacOT5FeOQu8FYKKw/MSM=; b=S3RcVnU4hmd00EmP6I8GhZbU+WzbZq1c6U/HbNknAGYuqJ/jl5M5tq8zfjuZgcuJ/6 Y0evuKAzw7VLk1HiPhGWX6g9wTggmk1yzLxQvJ6jC5tvUIF8VjIwjkfGsqk75SxRQ2Ck mYAhAFTqzve4mmoMcaTNZG1EcKLCv3E6m7PMLfj87ro/WOApu+hqBVzZTRrElp1F+u/0 r4NtoZdF9GS6nEhkil6YlEd1A5uqtWCGgr+d8HaUFgvuUdmLxeeGXLXhIwmf0QWR0oqa bcJRKnlymLk6zqWVsXzYoMOSRnIRDU4oXkq+Kf+m3p+sA1VrdEY7IwX1W0iY8amIoYEQ gP6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfTPX0Vut/RFNucs5JgpQsan3C8aAjSCjny2rX+ZJ1rpZ7SH9e KKXGHJSq+ZGL6soQSavIDOQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzMRUizoLxGx733mlZtCyuyhTduCU5ryBerY26NmHyhwRhN5HYxZYlyeP9VuF6XSSUqagQF7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4d03:: with SMTP id o3mr3153770wmh.164.1575277461330; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:04:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:b51f:470:88de:5f36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm38440812wrv.60.2019.12.02.01.04.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:04:20 -0800 (PST) References: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:04:20 +0100 Message-ID: <874kyj14kr.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Bengt Richter writes: > Would s/exemples/examples/g do any good? Definitely. From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:26:09 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: bug#38445: closed (Re: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken) Message-ID: References: <871rtnkrl3.fsf@gnu.org> <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 38445 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 38445@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:08:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1575277682-8286-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1575277682-8286-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #38445: Guix CI evaluation broken which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 38445@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 38445: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38445 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1575277682-8286-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 38445-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2019 09:08:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibhgW-00029R-Vw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:08:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibhgV-00029E-KD for 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:08:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibhgQ-0002OR-3O; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:07:54 -0500 Received: from [62.102.229.57] (port=30419 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ibhgP-0002OL-Fh; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:07:53 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Bengt Richter Subject: Re: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken References: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 Frimaire an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:24:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> (Bengt Richter's message of "Sun, 1 Dec 2019 19:33:38 -0800") Message-ID: <871rtnkrl3.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38445-done Cc: 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Cl=C3=A9ment & Bengt, Bengt Richter skribis: > On +2019-12-01 18:20:24 +0100, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D99c45877a984dd01= 48151b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 >>=20 >> broke Guix CI. >>=20 >> The reason is: >>=20 >> (local-file (string-append "" "../some-file")) >>=20 >> now differs from >>=20 >> (local-file "../some-file") >>=20 >> And in gnu/system/install.scm (line 246) there's a STRING-APPEND. >>=20 >> We could probably do an easy fix by changing (string-append Sorry for the breakage! I noticed it yesterday and fixed it in 33d1c970c323971da8d70a662748c7b1b520d6b6. Let me know if you think anything else is wrong! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1575277682-8286-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2019 17:20:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibSto-0008K6-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:44 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStm-0008Jw-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStl-0001Dy-I3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStk-0002Wk-Du for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:36017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibStj-0002VF-0f; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:20:39 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id p17so14539639wma.1; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:20:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2L9c47OA80KW1nXyvY+sJpbqcomW+LKNAjBlm2R9Yls=; b=JtiGMTfpYIvcPlkG3PH7toN6hhtNu1JGIMrUD1aOVF6JbqylEFinUH6En3A2LbbZ4r DVFfJR+qjjUlLYQZaMdMJbJ8xXnctsns4nmuzev4dh9AArXB6QboOfcrhWeuo/g2pxVX 3jL2d8xli19aMw88G/QR4sXX8kWhiy8ld4Wb2lY3kw7Qhrr5jZUDw/QLb4o8WoR7FdeL RYl9xK80iQTRnahalkOKRXdIY+3aNUfewU6A0FcciHN0kBESPSJajPCzfWhdnL6SG/ci EKs7Fm2jGUUZDgclsRYl6fwPFJHYbhWRBC7gICW0Dv2IR+0oXZGcaxOCUFX1vTxMUX+T HEbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWStS8mf43xFz39lGzvJIACYhxVd4lp8p4+El1y6goPPrBxLNdm wN//PuoBCN5NFLNb2Gx2yHIfNtPr X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+5DOf5TVT7nmIswiijY432WPBb4unRtqIUGshYH9y7NrQ+zVOTJnSvXkAcbfd6ODFwtfAhA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:305:: with SMTP id q5mr25497695wmd.167.1575220837242; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:b51f:470:88de:5f36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16sm6268347wmb.36.2019.12.01.09.20.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:20:36 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: bug-guix@gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org Subject: Guix CI evaluation broken Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 18:20:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.54 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=99c45877a984dd0148151b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 broke Guix CI. Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Hi, https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D99c45877a984dd01481= 51b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 broke Guix CI. The reason is: (local-file (string-append "" "../some-file")) now differs from (local-file "../some-file") And in gnu/system/install.scm (line 246) there's a STRING-APPEND. We could probably do an easy fix by changing (string-append "exemples/" ...) to (string-append "gnu/system/exemples/" ...) but still, I find that new behaviour weird. Cl=C3=A9ment ------------=_1575277682-8286-1-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:26:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38445 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D38445.157527919110705 (code D ref 38445); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 38445-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2019 09:33:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibi4t-0002ma-B5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:33:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:44778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibi4r-0002mN-ER for 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:33:09 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q10so7096135wrm.11 for <38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:33:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TfWQCPGlpk647grCpfvycXifz5BxLpRfjpLSlBRAdvc=; b=T0lb65wBuNRMLZRb4PmsShIl+DkA/49tdN4019mWzVSCcIhZdtQI8rYzrBa4IRdpYl 4JrKfQAuFIZAhikBrdapOcSjPo9lXWLnbJYvNNKmPrSLpgCBghlVD1Isc3rWnpnfoY/3 fMHbHePWG2xz0k3j/1Ua01RUlq8owtgNKEwENQjCfpMtQWovA87wfLTFp0ZFtGVIrVAh pfNkbUYU+HAbQbk5KnfQN/vcnkv06vzXMrl4tOuql3sK5eUX/sSRVw/PZarQZPjhjhfG C6ir+DJGn4oIvdQgjrW1cPQwonl8ruJqauiTxflsMDDi6JYvm/9dxh5J2xIKXnvyAOeq qB6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWV0jYz8PkXLLS+enPUHcLxovqB835xz6X53MQvJGjXd77nFjAL VID605mmKxpHlE8E754R7CvbYfdxJP1lNQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz7DIsnulnf9IKOXiWeTUqPX0g9YuY4BhSx8O92fGazMkbn4YZhX/u13IyxtYHxWLV6z25a7w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8041:: with SMTP id 59mr3075894wrk.257.1575279183236; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:33:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:b51f:470:88de:5f36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e8sm5961676wrt.7.2019.12.02.01.33.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:33:02 -0800 (PST) References: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <871rtnkrl3.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <871rtnkrl3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:33:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8736e3138y.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Hi Ludo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Sorry for the breakage! I noticed it yesterday and fixed it in > 33d1c970c323971da8d70a662748c7b1b520d6b6. > > Let me know if you think anything else is wrong! I find the initial commit[1] counterintuitive and would have loved a discussion before the fix. I defy anyone to understand why commit 33d1c97[2] would fix anything. Adding guix-devel. Cl=C3=A9ment [1]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D99c45877a984dd= 0148151b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 [2]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D33d1c970c32397= 1da8d70a662748c7b1b520d6b6 From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:26:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38445: Guix CI evaluation broken Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38445 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D38445.157528078913027 (code D ref 38445); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 38445-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2019 09:59:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibiUe-0003O3-Nm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:59:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:46846) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibiUc-0003Nq-Rr for 38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:59:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z7so39913405wrl.13 for <38445-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:59:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZE+Bhq3dk6Wx2Rb9jV1jdgeXMIds3g0+AcTeUVtLgs0=; b=RhQqJONhR5ptoguWjUtUgm+zr4pyj7n4/exdIZzmy+a0zU+Lip9iLpaOu8Jx9nJoh9 DVxChnvBCdnz5GiVD9ilD0b+C6jpqXXCjVNimX6juoahvvGy2DdhuUZa9cCpRhK0cN9M mYqqtGdYYK0FjEO3ToKdH5A8vbRFv+doTz5PgYcJGTXN0U9VTMuEvLc051hWAFEB0VgA 2jNLCd8Y6rU6jFCQWzoTNGWOIT9LQoaMOXdeM/o7k3uN8J9lDIrSBg5Ir6Iw6mAdL5+i hiFzAj5T0YNeeEW+xgAXvJKn9FXxtb2k3+QxvWoXS82Xs6w6r2r/xOvvO6ZYTnKlTRC8 Qa8w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWuwBfV2DXTDvKwd84zRMvJ8sXfPOJIyuMQ/biHl/coyrUYp8xT //JNIo6UDCb8KLjwCD0bF1uayMxEtpkUKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJ7tiI2srWsidriYUs4GdzQbOGpPMa2WbgOo0i5+95M5K+J55cPoLd3cFFBouIv+QSHIrsGA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:81e3:: with SMTP id 90mr24730333wra.23.1575280780673; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:59:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:b51f:470:88de:5f36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm9024846wrx.71.2019.12.02.01.59.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:59:39 -0800 (PST) References: <87muccvu7b.fsf@lassieur.org> <20191202033338.GA128659@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <871rtnkrl3.fsf@gnu.org> <8736e3138y.fsf@lassieur.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <8736e3138y.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:59:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhgbyrn8.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Sorry for my tone, it might sound harsh, it's not what I meant, I just didn't have coffee yet ;) Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > Hi Ludo, > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Sorry for the breakage! I noticed it yesterday and fixed it in >> 33d1c970c323971da8d70a662748c7b1b520d6b6. >> >> Let me know if you think anything else is wrong! > > I find the initial commit[1] counterintuitive and would have loved a > discussion before the fix. > > I defy anyone to understand why commit 33d1c97[2] would fix anything. > > Adding guix-devel. > > Cl=C3=A9ment > > [1]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D99c45877a984= dd0148151b2e304afef6fb04f1a5 > [2]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D33d1c970c323= 971da8d70a662748c7b1b520d6b6