GNU bug report logs - #38414
guix pull error while building gcc-core-mesboot-2.95.3

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38414 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38414 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brendan Tildesley <btild <at> mailbox.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: guix pull error while building gcc-core-mesboot-2.95.3
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 09:50:15 +0100 (CET)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I'm trying to run guix pull after 4 months. This is guix on Arch.

guix (GNU Guix) fbeb92d7607dc1dc6c3a34a536352636274a69de
guix-daemon (GNU Guix) 1.0.0-1.326dcbf




...
build-@ build-log 3527328 6
gcc-co@ build-log 3527328 6
re-mes@ build-log 3527328 6
boot-2@ build-log 3527328 6
.95.3.@ build-log 3527328 6
drv-0/@ build-log 3527328 6
gcc-2.@ build-log 3527328 6
95.3/g@ build-log 3527328 4
cc'
@ build-log 3527328 13
make: *** [al@ build-log 3527328 15
l-gcc] Error 2
@ build-log 3527328 374
command "make" "CC=tcc -static -D __GLIBC_MINOR__=6" "OLDCC=tcc -static -D __GLIBC_MINOR__=6" "CC_FOR_BUILD=tcc -static -D __GLIBC_MINOR__=6" "AR=ar" "RANLIB=ranlib" "LIBGCC2_INCLUDES=-I /gnu/store/sdwpf8ai39y0hb98gd02qgx32s3las49-tcc-boot-0.9.27/include" "LANGUAGES=c" "BOOT_LDFLAGS= -B/gnu/store/sdwpf8ai39y0hb98gd02qgx32s3las49-tcc-boot-0.9.27/lib/" failed with status 2
builder for `/gnu/store/kcyh6k46ijm9nsq1as26rr0aq7rkx4f7-gcc-core-mesboot-2.95.3.drv' failed with exit code 1
@ build-failed /gnu/store/kcyh6k46ijm9nsq1as26rr0aq7rkx4f7-gcc-core-mesboot-2.95.3.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/kcyh6k46ijm9nsq1as26rr0aq7rkx4f7-gcc-core-mesboot-2.95.3.drv' failed with exit code 1
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/slnyk8gbnvfwy1m1was8myivpss58idd-gcc-mesboot0-2.95.3.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/2633565gzh4jqh7c5zf6i0iy9yxqigcv-glibc-mesboot0-2.2.5.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/2lpg626q4x8v7hgqajywpq1rc8y72hzx-binutils-mesboot-2.20.1a.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/7pllq0crksfkr7856y1pawcy4scc7l4q-gcc-mesboot1-4.7.4.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/lp6fycqqd8adndlfylh4mlihm0qakxzw-glibc-mesboot-2.16.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5ad88jy4a1gpbslzdiksk7zjyh28wzkr-make-mesboot-3.82.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5xh3f9lxl86imd56fk8n6wcqdcrzh2mb-binutils-cross-boot0-2.32.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/492grrzzhh8z7nv9vrh9vai6kk7zfj8i-diffutils-boot0-3.7.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/56xfnvjd2qv05vx3j0s6b30h9dg3dqcj-file-boot0-5.33.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/b1n16vi8ypfr1bsgrcgk67h6sixghy0c-findutils-boot0-4.6.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/h6pl88jbzlgan2majgy0z6kcphzp2x6q-gcc-cross-boot0-7.4.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5lcadggb83v1dfyza323lcw8ih199v1l-gcc-mesboot-wrapper-4.9.4.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/rmfsg2dsb88b136arb40z3kgd57kcnzs-glibc-2.29.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/qcx5p89cac2ghvc4k6cq2c6dsm3xncp1-glibc-intermediate-2.29.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/djxlq3ilag624v2zr8ya3zivwcrpiji7-linux-libre-headers-4.19.56.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/88azrsd0d3axcp043yrd4pl78ifd5368-make-boot0-4.2.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/my4rsf2nhcxd9n106bjrdmw56k26cc2j-perl-boot0-5.30.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/rhqqd8kmr1fqc9fkzpbh0qca4mwb03xa-texinfo-6.6.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/j5lp13iwcwnsdk545lgg1nh8kn4jdj3d-ghostscript-9.27.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
Backtrace:
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
859:2 19 (_ _)
720:2 18 (_ _)
In ./guix/monads.scm:
482:9 17 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
590:13 16 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
1699:8 15 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
859:2 14 (_ _)
720:2 13 (_ _)
In ./guix/monads.scm:
482:9 12 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
590:13 11 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
1699:8 10 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
859:2  9 (_ _)
720:2  8 (_ _)
In ./guix/monads.scm:
482:9  7 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
590:13  6 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
1699:8  5 (_ _)
1734:38  4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 6c8fd80>)
In ./guix/packages.scm:
948:16  3 (cache! #<weak-table 207/443> #<package guile-gcrypt <at> 0?> ?)
1267:22  2 (thunk)
1200:25  1 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 6c8fd80> #<?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
592:17  0 (map1 (("source" #<origin #<<git-reference> url: "?>) ?))

srfi/srfi-1.scm:592:17: In procedure map1:
Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &store-protocol-error [message: "build of `/gnu/store/j5lp13iwcwnsdk545lgg1nh8kn4jdj3d-ghostscript-9.27.drv' failed" status: 100] 6306150>)'.
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/gzmi7pv8pbfk91a2mrhxzybmbmhjjb3b-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "37515553b5678c61f59dd0efb2504c0ccc5152f2"; system: "x86_64-linux";

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #8 received at 38414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Brendan Tildesley <btild <at> mailbox.org>, 38414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38414: guix pull error while building gcc-core-mesboot-2.95.3
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:04:14 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Brendan Tildesley <btild <at> mailbox.org> writes:

> I'm trying to run guix pull after 4 months. This is guix on Arch.

Is this bug report still relevant?  It looks like you have binary
substitutes disabled, is that on purpose?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #13 received at 38414-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>
To: 38414-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Bug not relevant anymore.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:48:12 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>> I'm trying to run guix pull after 4  months. This is guix on Arch.

> Is this bug report  still relevant? It looks like you have binarysubstitutes disabled, is 
that on purpose?

They were never intentionally disabled. not sure what happened since i 
hadn't touched it in ages.

Closing since I haven't experienced this since. it wont be pursued.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.