From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:05:30 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#38368 <38368@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#38368 <38368@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback Reply-To: bug#38368 <38368@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:05:30 +0000 retitle 38368 gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback reassign 38368 emacs submitter 38368 kris severity 38368 normal tag 38368 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 07:58:09 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 12:58:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47858 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZDwP-0005Xt-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:58:09 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZDqU-0005JQ-4w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:52:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43131) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ3eH-0006mB-8s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:58:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ3eG-0005ab-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:58:45 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]:39895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ3eG-0005aU-4w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:58:44 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id z65so6575350qka.6 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:58:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sSZ63YYvHlNx/YNFAttr7I2OdmqG+JV9s9n7O2sTk3Q=; b=uGcHV/mUlfSjjih7zvfNX6rgsJdClLZpJeUsQhqbq9kt7JvLPmMCFif17oEiUHr59N CsKADOa2rlNhZ1XbT7vz2JAoFiBRHeFIoFmIgHFMHghWrXaXNhHeSWNG4bgVSJ4wnwZ3 OEdZ2WYbYwKp/AfiqIi/TdBfNc/gLuLoXeYxByBBk5wfM9SEiTIMe+MxMtq0djJKi1Qh RzWvBr6TdN1kqC09OZTxPgva99t8FV9MnCaunLy6lBwHyUQZjCPgIV93UbH4DTgCbggq Uuav9ixPOSTs/U/XjGYE2o29QkDawkZf4HRTTQeqRDwnOBPfBPPZtz9rlJVy50vWwOU/ ZAOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sSZ63YYvHlNx/YNFAttr7I2OdmqG+JV9s9n7O2sTk3Q=; b=Uo0co6tV4DGeylzdXc05fePWfDahFKFa3wcZcgfkEwTH+dlnAlfS36ahYEVfsLikTF O5Kh8kwAgCGbPPWWj8B/74FJZT33+Ndsc4E739xkhYNoU9v40wGCEBnFmERbELt6vuFt OmAHU5obRpBV1pPqEefwL3NVTIVv0vmmR5wr3xP906MAWjfqLeCREP62v2Ta4WpqbcP3 WAlD8EMo+znKcsEZJXsaK2UrDCNKZ8IcfxUqeB6ybhxZkM5lyUhQoHJKmU3fyCL1giR2 W7jLCzqKENaGb1RSYpcjQtoknF1VOWhSFLyaKw7Brkvua+888bxC37ajIvqYZHHrd/t4 e7sg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVGDzSaA8rUtlW2DLRa+q+iouPdCDnEmL/oHDLtNCpuBd7TMXZp CbxhZjw1mwIUZeDxc7SFObgrRtHBgZmuQdKvPcfICw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyColgM5aaRwk3iIVCxLa4Q1/jWUHehnogqs/GmI/KzlzAhsbttSULF+d0fVOuhhjIdJLlP4AR5hztqDQ0LUpM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3dd:: with SMTP id r29mr24714882qkm.370.1574647123320; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:58:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a0c:e306:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:58:42 -0800 (PST) From: kris Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:58:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::734 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) hello I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). *********** A successful return from dlclose() does not guarantee that the symbols associated with handle are removed from the caller's address space. In addition to references resulting from explicit dlopen() calls, a shared object may have been implicitly loaded (and reference counted) because of dependencies in other shared objects. Only when all references have been released can the shared object be removed from the address space. ******** that strikes me as undermining the docs for RTLD_NOLOAD in the same page which say that residency CAN be tested. i do the following to ensure the object is unloaded: void *handle = dlopen(path,RTLD_NOW | RTLD_NOLOAD); if(handle){ return(dlclose(handle) || dlclose(handle) ); } ... it appears to take 2 calls to achieve the unload which I presume means the refcount got incremented by this dlopen() despite the RTLD_NOLOAD. then I test again this way and the 2nd dlclose() fails and confirms the object is unloaded. or so I thought. this worked until I came to recursively load a chain of objects (not automatically) and then tried reloading the 1st in the chain. despite doing the above closing sequence on the chain in reverse order and finally on the head of the chain, before doing another dlopen() with a new version of the disk file, I found that extracting the data from the address returned from a dlsym() yielded old data. I have to conclude that the object unload does NOT happen and that the above dlopen(RTLD_NOLOAD)/dlclose() test is erroneous (at least in this layered arrangement). so getting back to the original ambiguity claim, the passage mentions removing symbols in the first instance then switches to 'references being released' the next. what are 'references' (symbols?) and how does one determine anything about them or rather enough to 'release' them so as to circumvent the lack of a guarantee from dlclose() ? I have scoured the available docs and can find no more on how to ascertain what prevents unloading or how such can be addressed. I hope you agree there is at least a lack of clarity. thanks for reading. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 18:13:31 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 23:13:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXv-0004hb-I7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXu-0004hP-7W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:30 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXp-0004aH-5R for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:25 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXo-0007qq-SC for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:24 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 38368 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:24 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) merge 38364 38368 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 20:27:37 2019 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2019 01:27:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZPdh-0001cO-BP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:27:37 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZPde-0001bz-T1; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:27:35 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iZPdW-0008By-3l; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:27:28 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: kris Subject: Re: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback References: Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:27:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: (kris's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:58:42 +0100") Message-ID: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: kris writes: > I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). This bug report landed in the Emacs bug tracker -- perhaps because of the debbugs.gnu.org outage yesterday? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 Cc: 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) kris writes: > I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). This bug report landed in the Emacs bug tracker -- perhaps because of the debbugs.gnu.org outage yesterday? What package was this bug report meant for? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 21:49:07 2019 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2019 02:49:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZQuZ-0007f6-3X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:49:07 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:46183) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZQuY-0007eZ-39 for 38368@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:49:06 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id r20so19714149qtp.13 for <38368@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:49:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AqkJwEd3iZnUFyUAJ1n3ldVYhxQx3Z43zQW8oM9tvYQ=; b=MIC40PDKsyhQX+JbEYC0Ig48aqbqdIB4AghdOa/9feofMXh3N4jK1A3yyLNZCGIesd 2BeGXeazTVZloL1GxxnjT2SzZ2wY7g9CI6LwRcTW01KfaenrF03V5AZk7ZB9SPxzlCsp iZj5QzZmoxmMv86AhipiBz2rE+8m34EiuVzsI5CG/bVzyXs/gvN6nmrX7mrQ43QP1HOP PUXfHWMTKw3QntwtQAIC8XQV6bsg5xV13VXpxc/I3yevTv2HnzPsvaW1ffSH/0Ktdvkw emwMkrevq1qI8RUefrZZOSI5vaP6/zrGLgtjI61GX264tZsXUqUwXo1RSs0CAYCBMCsl p6IQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=AqkJwEd3iZnUFyUAJ1n3ldVYhxQx3Z43zQW8oM9tvYQ=; b=HE1lLZmwlbCvpcoFZqJU63+8IVoemvN88dTqWqLx95tdBEpRmq09b9ktsgTm2yPmsr zcKaUoH1FSo3d0khJujbwGUQZGj6RsVVsr8uKXBL3nQ5wVRj5TpcjWh6AnKKcL+v791G b5G3nPPk/d61pyULtLFFtO8ZPLUtNzlxEBMJ8NcviSveFnfagZNuQIMQr2IwOIN03Azu xAfUiuAOOzLC3t8STI0im4gQV2tIGdu4Mdmdi02rB5Ii7zTkF3vmIj3uYtTl1dYuezUu ECQofDxQoi6YrHj9wgdlh5zaHvEPRLXJ6B01U+af9kSonj7AFuYcl+mf2f3Wf7HK1BNn JWKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgYqag+3mRjafzVur4XfheIKaWxvcjq5EmXQ5P+TLD8jhj2IlS ufdusxUwRWS/YK7PrZuF2YmqhNo/m9VL+ooH9h+KNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygfiaLsKrK1pbZBR10MH40bJ4eIhNHflwKHMqguX5Jb6F0iHX9L1/x8c3Xi/Ii5u2kj/lRHG5g2MtFSyTF8nM= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:28a1:: with SMTP id i30mr33898993qti.245.1574736540473; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:49:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a0c:e306:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:48:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: kris Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 03:48:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#38368: Acknowledgement (gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback) To: 38368@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) hello. apart from making the mistake of titling 'gcc' rather than 'glibc', on revue I was also vague about what I saw as the ambiguity in the documentation. to wit: on the one hand the docs state dlclose() does NOT guarantee unloading of the object. on the other a means is provided for determining if an object is resident (RTLD_NOLOAD). having done that once and dlclose()ed as needed (twice if the handle was non-null), if a 2nd attempt to dlopen() returns null then that is indeed confirmation of unloading. so, in this way, a guarantee is obtained of unloaded status and it was done via a combination of dlopen() and dlclose() (multiple). my contention is that the mention of dlclose() being 'not guaranteed' could be qualified by indicating how to go about it. that said, I methodically went through getting this confirmation of unloaded status for a recursive chain, and still found that data obtained through a dlsym() on the re-opened chain-head object did not correspond to the content of the refreshed disk file. I am totally confused about that! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 05:48:26 2019 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 10:48:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF4b-0004tX-QI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:48:26 -0500 Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:38614) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF4Y-0004t9-5M; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:48:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=w5iq8V3Uv0k8JmIniGVhAgBzDpEG54MjYQ/+yuv7Bh4=; b=diaREDOIoE9s6IZ1NVNpOwXPZN cHxhJeP3hR6HqSD5lrAw79d6WKkXPK0mcHu89Gvl2x2hqZe9JD5kM8K8ch896fcptWR/MKjZXxYtC PyhDtska8stHFjSjRNAWyXXRw3l+8hZHgyFT0ophytzUD8vI32wR9qLyGgNMKRJkAOhBQuhZLsX1j 7/utU7IWQT5BI3NyzqDZs4/6rbabOjQoOKK8gBN4xqqkpW6GTE0QUz0K9cu5DXnZ5JR17EvjCuhSh KNxi3ZYJmgSHOxXQs/4XOTSQMXTeqKIf71pgHFlQAj1FzsTysg6k9h+P33x2Nn3gb0WmZqbj/xcf7 wUm2nqpA==; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:60640 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1imF4R-001l0i-W8; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:48:16 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback In-Reply-To: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:27:25 +0100") References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:48:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > kris writes: > >> I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). > > This bug report landed in the Emacs bug tracker -- perhaps because of > the debbugs.gnu.org outage yesterday? > > What package was this bug report meant for? This seems to be intended for glibc, but they do not use debbugs according to: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/FilingBugs I can't figure out how to forward a bug to them without creating an account here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best proceed here. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 05:49:14 2019 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 10:49:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF5O-0004vK-3D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:49:14 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF5M-0004v3-Kr; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:49:13 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1imF5D-0007g4-RF; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:49:06 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:49:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:48:14 +0100") Message-ID: <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a > bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back > here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a > bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back > here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best proceed here. It should probably be closed in the Emacs bug tracker, anyway. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 05:53:54 2019 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 10:53:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF9u-00052R-3B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:53:54 -0500 Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:38994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF9p-000520-8Q; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:53:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=scsSuCRu7C27yJ2O09GSzINDe7Q/tID3p9RjbD7hyis=; b=dCuOYkl+/w25TdrW5SQqZ619d5 BaQVwbMmPPGVFYpl6CIF5ucENbRCmGGEosDFdlpGlVhA9vDg5EXumqEMSdBlNgtU4dgaokO27oZSQ OzxppFo3vnfi5yYIXHlBLAeez2uomEw1gORgf4zTtefREaUCV7rfVTSNxjW/2iO+x00wXM7IRSdcw 29O8Gf3fHo1sGC2ArlK+io+jRnKvIhoN6lyokh3VjyOuJx+cIODSgtpE1axPbhZtlIlFiCSXWN0F0 bSezqmdE+hR++K/10VsFjvL2C0f9MWcKOGDzoJDQWdw/xVtWfTA91fRNqhsgipF+3Y/asTo0yNvgP hsoxHjxg==; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:35030 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1imF9j-001m4B-Hc; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:53:43 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback In-Reply-To: <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:49:03 +0100") References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 38364 + notabug tags 38368 + notabug close 38364 close 38368 thanks Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a >> bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back >> here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best proceed here. > > It should probably be closed in the Emacs bug tracker, anyway. Closed. If anyone knows how to go about forwarding this bug to glibc, then please help do so. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 01 05:59:05 2020 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2020 10:59:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imbiT-0006N9-3N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 05:59:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:42686) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imbiQ-0006MZ-EW; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 05:59:03 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 4so20685422pfz.9; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 02:59:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R1P0Wd+96Wk7J361LQIqqS6jbIP4aLJho9WHwAN6K+U=; b=dfHsMtwRIcWI1ilzrrb5oXMDa1IZN5W8dhdJ8KkLQf0xKNTvGoY40omWndbIMh+qVi JXQ6Q3dlTSuqRP7nQ6UwipYaSgGpjxclHrFUPHOymJpMyxqgNR6A5lmmt1AnlAC2/tyb Q6ArFDmBNxarI/EbLkksAwIDUwl3M20jAeWF8us5C1fii5yzkSLCYpLVbNJcqaO3O9H1 RM8gbPlHyvbfMuOVz/VlLO/qPU0gmaCrxG/OEWMlqlYn0v64fwDEkNcYLyfCpAayfukp UlcPqylFb2cyPIM2hNY3hkVnjkp619Bigdg0zinryK8ZKrpaO68u+Bts8AdJLGdWdBxE snTw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVe2MkaDcZeHfpsPraSf2O1dWGL8F3CprxSLj/blmCM9ySuI2Ux 7a7SJnhgYOc3bCxUPBdvPu6uHzky5YG4qWHPx3I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHb6FbTO7mzv512VmdZo3BzQhpoZek8F08FNtjH3DV4dg1lbmmFPj/7N2Jdx0KjcYIB/fzOe5fOOvjSXWvTq8= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9a10:: with SMTP id w16mr59647099pfj.107.1577876336594; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 02:58:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> In-Reply-To: <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 11:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, libc-maintainers@gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) Dear libc-maintainers, There was a submisson to the Emacs bug tracker which seems to relate to glibc. We have closed the bug report in our own bug tracker, but you might like to take note of it. You can find the details here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38364 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38368 Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 07 16:16:40 2020 Received: (at 38368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2020 21:16:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iowDP-00061G-A7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:16:40 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:47760 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iovhG-0005B7-BN for 38368@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:43:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578429805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DWeq3aNtZGI+wCTPHEstvt+cH7cdPLySMhav3tl5VyQ=; b=XM+8/Jt/n/ZODjwIalJ8lVD4ZJiuBFLxO00mjZvf3sWG48bRerYASSPip49YELAxR2tiTx aBxWmEmto/UJ6iZrg3UeNEOqsrYsXz/RyJOvR2RvZkOfwmcZXlRc3TWfXTfu2onGFM1mMd X9oKhyVdg+iabYA+QdS0unb8JJvfvnQ= Received: from mail-qt1-f200.google.com (mail-qt1-f200.google.com [209.85.160.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-204-O6x_dDBGMXWUm9grSRmmtQ-1; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:43:22 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f200.google.com with SMTP id l5so605722qte.10 for <38368@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DWeq3aNtZGI+wCTPHEstvt+cH7cdPLySMhav3tl5VyQ=; b=tdDCvkHrkOxD9aoSMa47DHPPMscdeY4kXsRUtOHdYru00HmB1N9hAvsVNtalBXxCzt rbOA/aCVwVFIUkC4VkyTg68PcAhJPp+dogIcz6F6DD5cFuLc7B5AvJNAP2+/nIP4Ff0A UZpMT0WZCWMK1dI+OVxcN97DK/w1Wy7QBDO5OTgvyh//3urI5k8vy0w0Yrd2TcJjgNap p2TRIk/PhVyuSFKg7iN0Qu59LqZfBXcON6bEEQf4G9Q0Fe0W/3hb87cR5ZxN5Ee8ei0f WE/4j7KRwlM4EhXCV9Qes4PkuzgEcZTK0MuXj8w87ofOhpDROIN3fBQupSqR6tVkx3PL zhRw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUD/QgZ0w4LIn3U8kPUeHaE1orLuAkRcXtwqJiXrFXh8x7n76L8 HbAjIfAGS3VhSoDCqfhTBFO9+cMg6KVy7076wXud8dTv3VsbRlRVBzKBZXsU7ly17WjMg74y9FQ UfZq6fttcIYCRB/Y= X-Received: by 2002:a37:c449:: with SMTP id h9mr1182531qkm.124.1578429802123; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzEFflPXWoQJWbzc381Vd6VhXOlqqCiEAnD+0GZaeTmsOkJJL96vG4GmyXHhq20A2rCVqTP9g== X-Received: by 2002:a37:c449:: with SMTP id h9mr1182519qkm.124.1578429801904; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (135-23-175-75.cpe.pppoe.ca. [135.23.175.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n190sm378280qke.90.2020.01.07.12.43.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback To: Stefan Kangas , Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> From: Carlos O'Donell Message-ID: <1747b235-eab9-3e41-4483-1eeb77f27554@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:43:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-MC-Unique: O6x_dDBGMXWUm9grSRmmtQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38368 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:16:38 -0500 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, libc-maintainers@gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 1/1/20 5:58 AM, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Dear libc-maintainers, > > There was a submisson to the Emacs bug tracker which seems to relate > to glibc. We have closed the bug report in our own bug tracker, but > you might like to take note of it. > > You can find the details here: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38364 > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38368 Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I recommend you file a bug in the glibc bug tracker here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Or email libc-help@sourceware.org to discuss the details of the specific issue with developers. -- Cheers, Carlos. From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:05:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator