From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 07:56:03 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 12:56:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZDuM-0005TK-PR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:56:03 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZDqU-0005JQ-Lu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:52:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ3bx-0006gj-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:56:22 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ3bw-0004ou-D8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:56:21 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]:35047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ3bw-0004oh-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:56:20 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id n4so15467170qte.2 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:56:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sSZ63YYvHlNx/YNFAttr7I2OdmqG+JV9s9n7O2sTk3Q=; b=SNouqcfGRZZSS4WQuv97+feRPgUOg33cm+uziD+skoKF2PvsMu9xiDce96p7WO96uU Ad+XQ5KSwCsL5p4dUXiSW7Lc5PHA6Qg4UXDscTNUTMxuMn4HjB6yysQLlTgw3veReauJ OC/7CZ9zyYTDYtDaBAAt7wwU02NtMarY+FBGHIIyCHO3IveuFh+6ZW4U8zteyDxUksLK aWLaQD+0RziHsK1pbbRxvk05FDVaKlgmUvccvAG3Jel7PXu5st90nYxdypewlHE3x6Yk +Ic8kk8oCD45e5V6VQt9OdY9AlvWRucZ64QEm6OeYzBqEEloHnni+yOHkAYRV7qKVlvZ A2NA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sSZ63YYvHlNx/YNFAttr7I2OdmqG+JV9s9n7O2sTk3Q=; b=XytESFpcYqcK9xh6sRma2ArGMB8El7HqV+J8ZlEIsur6qrus8JmSvBanBV/y1WM2S4 bvVDjYRrSmjT4wu8hpWWKrHOqULbLmi8U21q9iYJCLdTswx386TBMAo5aWo846YB2y6s u6IynB5lCvDMe145UeiSP0+UznHYxhoGGzZEFl8crX1tONb05LSxaNtGC1UnkCdEslWr qk3mf0kZcGafL5esOxg2nUQlH21FRXrdzvCExlSnrjGVi15Ojlf3DPV+/0qMdaN8IEFu Rk/4Nl3O+0b++6rFTyuxJhTfWzC9FP/boko+aKwE/aaSWhMg+7GGi5aF9XQ2SDPmyNUK GmgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX38ZqnQWowaEh07wjOEi6xNX+5FPbFAgrl+M/EF73WWW0r6veg wE7rzAy0Sur2nao9C1f9W/+SaR5rqa/OE5D1SWOYFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIMECGEaKvBt8maV5TohDzunSQrwP1yR8Ckrc9Ix+t+bCI7HADuoAEpeWtCoPnj94q7EkirDAXHgwqAW7lLvQ= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:138b:: with SMTP id h11mr8998644qtj.153.1574646978868; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:56:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a0c:e306:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:56:18 -0800 (PST) From: kris Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:56:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::830 X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: hello I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). A successful return from dlclose() does not guarantee that the symbols associated with handle are removed from the caller's address space. In addition to references resulting from explicit [...] Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cq.personal[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) hello I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). *********** A successful return from dlclose() does not guarantee that the symbols associated with handle are removed from the caller's address space. In addition to references resulting from explicit dlopen() calls, a shared object may have been implicitly loaded (and reference counted) because of dependencies in other shared objects. Only when all references have been released can the shared object be removed from the address space. ******** that strikes me as undermining the docs for RTLD_NOLOAD in the same page which say that residency CAN be tested. i do the following to ensure the object is unloaded: void *handle = dlopen(path,RTLD_NOW | RTLD_NOLOAD); if(handle){ return(dlclose(handle) || dlclose(handle) ); } ... it appears to take 2 calls to achieve the unload which I presume means the refcount got incremented by this dlopen() despite the RTLD_NOLOAD. then I test again this way and the 2nd dlclose() fails and confirms the object is unloaded. or so I thought. this worked until I came to recursively load a chain of objects (not automatically) and then tried reloading the 1st in the chain. despite doing the above closing sequence on the chain in reverse order and finally on the head of the chain, before doing another dlopen() with a new version of the disk file, I found that extracting the data from the address returned from a dlsym() yielded old data. I have to conclude that the object unload does NOT happen and that the above dlopen(RTLD_NOLOAD)/dlclose() test is erroneous (at least in this layered arrangement). so getting back to the original ambiguity claim, the passage mentions removing symbols in the first instance then switches to 'references being released' the next. what are 'references' (symbols?) and how does one determine anything about them or rather enough to 'release' them so as to circumvent the lack of a guarantee from dlclose() ? I have scoured the available docs and can find no more on how to ascertain what prevents unloading or how such can be addressed. I hope you agree there is at least a lack of clarity. thanks for reading. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 18:13:31 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 23:13:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXv-0004hb-I7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXu-0004hP-7W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:30 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXp-0004aH-5R for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:25 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iZNXo-0007qq-SC for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:24 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 38368 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:13:24 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) merge 38364 38368 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 20:27:37 2019 Received: (at 38364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2019 01:27:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZPdh-0001cM-4t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:27:37 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZPde-0001bz-T1; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:27:35 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iZPdW-0008By-3l; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:27:28 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: kris Subject: Re: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback References: Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:27:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: (kris's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:58:42 +0100") Message-ID: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: kris writes: > I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). This bug report landed in the Emacs bug tracker -- perhaps because of the debbugs.gnu.org outage yesterday? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38364 Cc: 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) kris writes: > I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). This bug report landed in the Emacs bug tracker -- perhaps because of the debbugs.gnu.org outage yesterday? What package was this bug report meant for? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 05:48:23 2019 Received: (at 38364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 10:48:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33780 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF4Z-0004tO-Fw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:48:23 -0500 Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:38614) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF4Y-0004t9-5M; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:48:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=w5iq8V3Uv0k8JmIniGVhAgBzDpEG54MjYQ/+yuv7Bh4=; b=diaREDOIoE9s6IZ1NVNpOwXPZN cHxhJeP3hR6HqSD5lrAw79d6WKkXPK0mcHu89Gvl2x2hqZe9JD5kM8K8ch896fcptWR/MKjZXxYtC PyhDtska8stHFjSjRNAWyXXRw3l+8hZHgyFT0ophytzUD8vI32wR9qLyGgNMKRJkAOhBQuhZLsX1j 7/utU7IWQT5BI3NyzqDZs4/6rbabOjQoOKK8gBN4xqqkpW6GTE0QUz0K9cu5DXnZ5JR17EvjCuhSh KNxi3ZYJmgSHOxXQs/4XOTSQMXTeqKIf71pgHFlQAj1FzsTysg6k9h+P33x2Nn3gb0WmZqbj/xcf7 wUm2nqpA==; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:60640 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1imF4R-001l0i-W8; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:48:16 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback In-Reply-To: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:27:25 +0100") References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:48:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38364 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > kris writes: > >> I think there is some ambiguity in the man page for dlclose(). > > This bug report landed in the Emacs bug tracker -- perhaps because of > the debbugs.gnu.org outage yesterday? > > What package was this bug report meant for? This seems to be intended for glibc, but they do not use debbugs according to: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/FilingBugs I can't figure out how to forward a bug to them without creating an account here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best proceed here. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 05:49:14 2019 Received: (at 38364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 10:49:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF5O-0004vM-8s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:49:14 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF5M-0004v3-Kr; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:49:13 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1imF5D-0007g4-RF; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:49:06 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:49:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:48:14 +0100") Message-ID: <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a > bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back > here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38364 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a > bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back > here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best proceed here. It should probably be closed in the Emacs bug tracker, anyway. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 05:53:51 2019 Received: (at 38364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 10:53:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF9q-00052H-R5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:53:51 -0500 Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:38994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imF9p-000520-8Q; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:53:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=scsSuCRu7C27yJ2O09GSzINDe7Q/tID3p9RjbD7hyis=; b=dCuOYkl+/w25TdrW5SQqZ619d5 BaQVwbMmPPGVFYpl6CIF5ucENbRCmGGEosDFdlpGlVhA9vDg5EXumqEMSdBlNgtU4dgaokO27oZSQ OzxppFo3vnfi5yYIXHlBLAeez2uomEw1gORgf4zTtefREaUCV7rfVTSNxjW/2iO+x00wXM7IRSdcw 29O8Gf3fHo1sGC2ArlK+io+jRnKvIhoN6lyokh3VjyOuJx+cIODSgtpE1axPbhZtlIlFiCSXWN0F0 bSezqmdE+hR++K/10VsFjvL2C0f9MWcKOGDzoJDQWdw/xVtWfTA91fRNqhsgipF+3Y/asTo0yNvgP hsoxHjxg==; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:35030 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1imF9j-001m4B-Hc; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:53:43 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback In-Reply-To: <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:49:03 +0100") References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38364 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 38364 + notabug tags 38368 + notabug close 38364 close 38368 thanks Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> The original submitter of the bug is in the best position to file a >> bug using their web interface, but has unfortunately not reported back >> here within 5 weeks. I'm therefore not sure how to best proceed here. > > It should probably be closed in the Emacs bug tracker, anyway. Closed. If anyone knows how to go about forwarding this bug to glibc, then please help do so. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 01 05:59:05 2020 Received: (at 38364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2020 10:59:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imbiS-0006N7-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 05:59:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:42686) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imbiQ-0006MZ-EW; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 05:59:03 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 4so20685422pfz.9; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 02:59:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R1P0Wd+96Wk7J361LQIqqS6jbIP4aLJho9WHwAN6K+U=; b=dfHsMtwRIcWI1ilzrrb5oXMDa1IZN5W8dhdJ8KkLQf0xKNTvGoY40omWndbIMh+qVi JXQ6Q3dlTSuqRP7nQ6UwipYaSgGpjxclHrFUPHOymJpMyxqgNR6A5lmmt1AnlAC2/tyb Q6ArFDmBNxarI/EbLkksAwIDUwl3M20jAeWF8us5C1fii5yzkSLCYpLVbNJcqaO3O9H1 RM8gbPlHyvbfMuOVz/VlLO/qPU0gmaCrxG/OEWMlqlYn0v64fwDEkNcYLyfCpAayfukp UlcPqylFb2cyPIM2hNY3hkVnjkp619Bigdg0zinryK8ZKrpaO68u+Bts8AdJLGdWdBxE snTw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVe2MkaDcZeHfpsPraSf2O1dWGL8F3CprxSLj/blmCM9ySuI2Ux 7a7SJnhgYOc3bCxUPBdvPu6uHzky5YG4qWHPx3I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHb6FbTO7mzv512VmdZo3BzQhpoZek8F08FNtjH3DV4dg1lbmmFPj/7N2Jdx0KjcYIB/fzOe5fOOvjSXWvTq8= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9a10:: with SMTP id w16mr59647099pfj.107.1577876336594; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 02:58:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> In-Reply-To: <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 11:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38364 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, libc-maintainers@gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) Dear libc-maintainers, There was a submisson to the Emacs bug tracker which seems to relate to glibc. We have closed the bug report in our own bug tracker, but you might like to take note of it. You can find the details here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38364 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38368 Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 07 16:16:41 2020 Received: (at 38364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2020 21:16:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iowDQ-00061J-LI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:16:41 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:56341 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iovhK-0005B6-RC for 38364@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:43:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578429805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DWeq3aNtZGI+wCTPHEstvt+cH7cdPLySMhav3tl5VyQ=; b=XM+8/Jt/n/ZODjwIalJ8lVD4ZJiuBFLxO00mjZvf3sWG48bRerYASSPip49YELAxR2tiTx aBxWmEmto/UJ6iZrg3UeNEOqsrYsXz/RyJOvR2RvZkOfwmcZXlRc3TWfXTfu2onGFM1mMd X9oKhyVdg+iabYA+QdS0unb8JJvfvnQ= Received: from mail-qt1-f197.google.com (mail-qt1-f197.google.com [209.85.160.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-315-asu6lWqsPwqkVfHlgi5kQw-1; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:43:22 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f197.google.com with SMTP id e1so617939qto.5 for <38364@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DWeq3aNtZGI+wCTPHEstvt+cH7cdPLySMhav3tl5VyQ=; b=EYnUC8oyHy0/GN+lia/m9UwczTnL8R+yJUBaYCgRtERx8SCr92TLfKbtR3FMH37GFu kIQi+QJAfW+bBugAACjku8iuUkoHx9Zab9uyJ2nzaN61ilW0oLc/CaQYGrmAYxw07top Vz5MHN0nOD0jnX8gEvFthanRl6Eg3Mq1+XyShx5OiMc11oydoWfF8IbSF+zeLQzCFTZe jWwFeav4vob7uVtqcfHlxm+ie0U/PtK3uRCk2LufcgZXH7CvFowVsJeS1dzJlmkLO2Mg P6CWzIZxftE6oFjCTyC12dDiV0MBHg3GzPsrZ+rYfkmNcyQng39BhJD1SDulJNaenkbo bucg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdIJ7Fr0iTLuUuY0EkX0NuDQHjv5iACcHDyyr8fbVmm5BgEDgq GCIDjd8zlpVIjwhb14Kv0bBozs6otEFzUN2BiMs8fSpmybIhieRCZZNqITPu/JsA74YBs7VoMcO sIq58wbup6s1kxTw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:c449:: with SMTP id h9mr1182535qkm.124.1578429802134; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzEFflPXWoQJWbzc381Vd6VhXOlqqCiEAnD+0GZaeTmsOkJJL96vG4GmyXHhq20A2rCVqTP9g== X-Received: by 2002:a37:c449:: with SMTP id h9mr1182519qkm.124.1578429801904; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (135-23-175-75.cpe.pppoe.ca. [135.23.175.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n190sm378280qke.90.2020.01.07.12.43.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:43:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#38364: bug#38368: gcc/ dlclose() documentation feedback To: Stefan Kangas , Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87tv6rig02.fsf@gnus.org> <87h81gbwk1.fsf@marxist.se> <87v9pwbwio.fsf@gnus.org> <878smsbway.fsf@marxist.se> From: Carlos O'Donell Message-ID: <1747b235-eab9-3e41-4483-1eeb77f27554@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:43:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-MC-Unique: asu6lWqsPwqkVfHlgi5kQw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38364 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:16:38 -0500 Cc: kris , 38364@debbugs.gnu.org, libc-maintainers@gnu.org, 38368@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 1/1/20 5:58 AM, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Dear libc-maintainers, > > There was a submisson to the Emacs bug tracker which seems to relate > to glibc. We have closed the bug report in our own bug tracker, but > you might like to take note of it. > > You can find the details here: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38364 > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38368 Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I recommend you file a bug in the glibc bug tracker here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Or email libc-help@sourceware.org to discuss the details of the specific issue with developers. -- Cheers, Carlos. From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:54:02 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator