Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:08:03 +0200

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100
> 
> > Should this be in NEWS?  How about manuals?
> 
> I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer
> isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem
> newsworthy.  

I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command.
But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will
need to know about, fine with me.